The Argument Of Federal Progressive Income Tax

928 WordsDec 9, 20154 Pages
Legal Illusion The arguments regarding federal progressive income tax has been represented to us through the United States Supreme Court, on the floors of congress, and in media. The revenue from taxes reached the objective of financing wars from the Civil War through World War II. At the same time deteriorating the economy with fewer dollars that could be used on imports, exports, and services (Henchman). Today, the United States deficit is $18,800,241,350,538.12 this is a grand total of 58,405.32 owed by every man, woman, and child (Brown). The legal illusion is presenting the question, is income tax legal? There are Americans today who believe income tax is not legal and stand by their beliefs in a movement that has cost many individuals considerably. I am interviewing such a person, his name is Bobby Ray and the history he presented to me was interesting, and has left me with more questions than answers. Today, the federal government controls unrestricted means to execute whatsoever the elected official desire, without reverence for the Constitution the aforementioned vanished gradually. Common people are not knowledgeable that the United States in 1776, did not have personal income tax sovereign, and in 1913; a perpetual income tax was inflicted upon the people. In actual fact, the Constitution disallowed a direct income tax on there person. For longer than a century, the leadership endured completely without proceeds from wages. Formerly, the U.S. government performed

More about The Argument Of Federal Progressive Income Tax

Open Document