The Argumentative Essay Of Banning Books

What is a banned book? A banned book is a book that has been removed from the shelves; it could be from a library, classroom, or even the bookstore because of its content. A book could be banned for many reasons, but it could be banned because it contains sex, violence, inappropriate language, religious viewpoints, witch craft, and many more things because other people deem it inappropriate. When someone bans a book they ban it for everyone else too.

The idea to ban certain books from schools and libraries is preposterous due to the manner in which the people trying to enforce these bans try to do so in. Banning books doesn’t help with the already present problem that our youth’s intelligence levels are already declining, and neither does allowing the freedom to all books. Banning certain books due to their constant use of inappropriate language, sexually explicit nature, and all around mature content has a respectfully reasonable reason to be inaccessible to younger audiences such as minors and teens; not young adults. The banning of books in libraries is outright inexcusable, unless the material is directly racist, subjective religious content, and all around hatred for a certain race or ethnicity; not if it’s used for fictional writing, in a softer manner mid you, to express the conflict in a story and/or to show real world problems, same go for non-fictional writing that expresses ideals in a manner of which isn’t disrespectful to other ideals and that do so in a manner of which isn’t so subjectively and deliberately showing hate for a certain race or ethnicity, especially

The problems with banned books has been a controversial issue between parents as well as adults. The concerns that parents have are with the fact that these certain books are to be banned to keep their kids from being exposed to some of the ways of the world. Some of the concerns that these parents have are with usage of some derrogatory words or lanuguage not preferrred by some parents. The things that parents fail to realize is that by law, a librarian has the responsibility that they must uphold; including their responsibilty to the stocking of books on their shelves. I would take the side of the librarian because their position would be worthless because their rights would be useless, and their job would

Public schools are becoming more laid back about what they teach in each subject to make it less uncomfortable for individuals to talk about; for example, sex education is taught in schools more in depth and at an earlier age today than in the past to make it easier for people to talk about sex in a more mature manner. Banning books that contain sexual content, vulgarity, and violence give children and young adults a reason to snicker about these topics when discussed in class because we are taught that these topics are not appropriate to talk about publicly. There are many factors that play a major role in how an individual perceives certain topics in books. If taught at an earlier age that these topics are suitable for mature

People are thinking to ban books which I think is really bad. Everywhere and everyday people are saying that some books need to be banned because some use the “n” liberally word in a different meaning and if you erase the book well you are kind of erasing history.

The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable. The censorship of books is a division of censorship that, apart from Internet censorship, receives the most publicity. Banning books is the most popular form of such censorship. Many banned books are literary classics, such as The Catcher in

Books are sometimes banned also because a vocal group finds that particular book offensive and immoral. Parents also attempt to remove books from the school curriculum because they find it too offensive. However, local school books may not be removed from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books. Each book that is banned or censored is done so for the content within the pages. There are a few common reasons that books have been banned or censored in schools, libraries, and book stores. These include Racial Issues, Encouragement of "Damaging" Lifestyles, Blasphemous Dialog, Sexual Situations or Dialog, Violence or Negativity, Presence of Witchcraft, Religious Affiliations (unpopular religions), Political Bias, and Age Inappropriate.

Books allow the mind to flourish, to wonder, to become the escape from reality that is desperately needed from time to time. Books can make no social comment, such as Dr. Seuss’s “Hop on Pop”, where the reader is just allowed to escape and go into an alternate reality. Books can also make a statement about social occurrences at the time, such as Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby”. Orson Scott Card‘s “Ender’s Game” falls into a category in between where it allows the reader into an escape from reality while making comments about the society of the time, as well a look into an exceptional child’s mind. All three of these books have something in common; they have all been at some point have had an individual or several individuals try to ban the book. Most often those who try to get a book banned do so due to violent or offensive content. However in some cases the reasons the book gets banned is completely ludicrous, as it is in the case of “Ender’s Game”. Card’s novel “Ender’s Game” was banned in Utah due to the efforts of a Mormon, who got a hold of a Baptist ban list, unaware of one way to get on that list is to be Mormon (Card Student). This shows that not all efforts to ban a book stem from the reader being offended by the content; in cases like this the person banning the book has not even read the book.

According to the other of “Banned and Challenged Books”, every year librarians take manners into their own hands and report hundreds of books containing inappropriate content in hope of banning them from school and public libraries, as well as school curriculums. When libraries and schools attempt to remove or restrict a book from the curriculum or library based upon the objections of a person’s point of view, the book is considered a challenged book. A book is only considered banned once it has been completely removed from its previous location. Librarians are motivated to challenge material with the desire to protect children from inappropriate sexual content, offensive language, or other

Parents don’t like their kids reading anything “inappropriate” or “too old for them” so they take their problems to the school board or the city to get the books banned. Religious groups don’t want people in their religion reading books that go against them. In Board of Education, Island Trees School District V. Pico in 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court stated “Local school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books…”. Schools cannot just remove their books from their libraries. First, and inquiry must be made about the motivation and intent of whoever is pushing for a removal. The intention of keeping students from certain ideas in a particular work is against the first amendment. Although, if complaints are made about a book, the school might choose to just quietly remove it instead of making a big deal out of it. Most incidents only happen at a local level. It’s hard to successfully pull off a book banning past that. According to an article called Banned Books on firstamendmentcenter.org, books are most frequently challenged because “they contain profanity or violence, sex or sex education, homosexuality, witchcraft and the occult, ‘secular humanism’ or ‘new age’ philosophies, portrayals of rebellious children, or ‘politically incorrect ‘ racist or sexist

Did you know books in schools everywhere, even The Dictionary, are banned? It is true, books are banned in schools due to mild language, sexual content, and inappropriate text. On the contrary, people argue that banning books prevent students’ from having full freedom to read whatever they want. Robert P. Doyle and Sharon Coatney stand with pro banning books, they both believe that banning books is for the benefit of the children and parents should see that and appreciate the school's decision. However, the parents are rightfully in charge of their children and their children alone. Another child shouldn’t have to reap the consequences of another parents choice for their kid. Banning books are for the benefit of the children, but are they really benefiting them? Or are they just preventing them from being able to read freely?

Why would someone take away a book based on a few opinions? There are many books being banned, but not everyone feels that they should be. In the thirty two year history of banning books, over eleven thousand have been challenged. Books are being banned for three major reasons, violent and sexual explicit material, children reading objectionable material, and the thought that teens will attempt potentially dangerous or morally wrong activities. Banning books should not be allowed because we are ridding many children, teengers, and young adults of lessons and examples that are learned through these books.

How can one person’s choice change others? For the writer, it could be the words they choose; the reader, the books they choose to read. However, when readers see something they don’t particularly like, they challenge the book. If enough people feel the same way, the book gets banned. But isn't our first amendment the freedom to express, write, and talk freely about anything and not be punished in any way? Seeing banned books shows us how we really are loyal and committed to the first amendment.

Things can be banned all of the time like posters, TV, music, etc., but the topic that is most shocking is books. Books can be banned through racial issues, encouragement of a damaging lifestyle, blasphemous dialog, sexual situations or dialog, violence or negativity, presence of witchcraft, religious affiliations, political bias, or being age inappropriate. These are the main reasons that books can be banned from store, libraries, and schools. Some of the most well-known banned books include The Adventures of Huckleberry Fin, The Catcher in The Rye, The Great Gatsby, The Harry Potter Series, and much more.

Books have made a monumental impact on our lives bigger than we realize. Throughout history, books have been used to write stories, history, parts of an individual’s life, and take us to places untouched by reality. Books have been used to challenge the thoughts and beliefs of others in the past and have helped change the future. If every book was challenged that didn’t agree with what society deemed as acceptable and inoffensive, we wouldn’t be where we are today. Understandably, there is two sides to this argument. Some individuals might argue that banning books can help our society by getting rid of toxic opinions in our literature. Both sides can have convincing points of view and logical arguments. Personally,