The Army 's Status As A Profession Essay

Stewardship of the Army Profession is the last of the Five Essential Characteristics of the Army Profession, but in terms of importance, it is just as, if not more important than the other four. The United States Army’s ADRP-1, or Army Doctrinal Reference Publication 1, even defines stewardship as “the responsibility of Army professionals to ensure the profession maintains its five essential characteristics now and into the future”. Such importance is placed on this characteristic because Stewardship of the Army Profession is the one that ensures the other four are maintained. I sought out the definition of stewardship because despite having spent almost three and a half years and West Point, I was not entirely sure what the doctrine behind Stewardship was. In doing this, I felt like I was better prepared for both this paper and ensuring that the corrections I made were stewarding the profession. With this newly acquired knowledge, I set out to make my corrections.

As the Army transitions from the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, the organization is well served to take a long look in the mirror. After ten plus years of deployments, our combat tested warriors are sure to possess more than enough valuable knowledge to reinforce and improve upon our status as a profession. A TRADOC published paper explains “to be a professional is to understand, embrace, and competently practice the expertise of the profession.” I believe the profession of arms exists and there are many components that reinforce this argument. Among these components, initial entry training and institutional learning, shared values, and a monopoly on our mission are three of the most important tenants. All Soldiers must graduate

The main idea of this publication is to create a collective understanding of the Army Profession by providing the Service members the guidelines and definitions of it and the Army Ethic. Fail to follow or even understand the concept of rules of behavior based on ideas about what is morally good and bad have been the reason of studies, due to the consequences this could bring upon the service. This publication defines the membership and affiliation of competent individuals in character and commitment, five essential characteristics legitimize the Army as a military profession, trust, military expertise, honorable service, spirit de corps, and stewardship. Trust is vital in society at school, at work, at home, among the citizens, trust in the skills of those you depend on, and trust that the mail will be deliver to your home to give an example. American people perhaps have lost or are close to lose the trust in the highest level of government being this the direct orchestrator of the actions perform by the armed forces, after planning and rehearsals every move is directed and now that the population does not support or agreed with many of these actions government has to act to regain the support and reassurance of the masses. American people as society trust their arm forces to perform their duty to protect them and their country, support and defend the constitution society trust the strongest Army in the world due to the technology it possess and the will soldiers have

The United States Army consists of 2.2 million brave men and women who work hard every single day in defending our country. They fight everyday to protect us and our freedoms. In today’s society, each man and woman make the personal decision to join the military, nobody forces them to. Some have argued that the United States needs to bring back the Draft to increase the number of people serving in the military. There are others who oppose it.

Their are many continuities with respect to how the United States constructs its military between 1776 to 2015. The military was and still is an appealing option for poor Americans. As written by Howard Zinn in A People’s History of The United States, “In fact, the military became a place of promise for the poor, who might rise in rank, acquire some money, change their social status.” This was true

In the thirty years after the War of 1812, the United States gradually and painstakingly developed its army from a nascent confederation of independent state militiamen, volunteers, and a disproportionately smaller group of regular soldiers into a corporate body of professionals with seemingly common standards of training, doctrine, and, arguably, discipline. Referred to as the “Thirty Year’s Peace,”

Preferably, the men and women of a nation’s army should be loyal to their country, motivated, focused and hardworking, amongst other admirable qualities. These types of men and women don’t join the army because they had to, they wanted to. They are volunteers. The U.S. should not create their army by draft because some draftees never wanted to join the army, let alone fight for their country. Having unmotivated or unpatriotic members leads to an unsuccessful army. Often times, draftees are difficult to direct and train because of their opposition. Additionally, the draft is unnecessary because there are more than enough volunteers willing to fight for their country.

Various Americans are addressing whether the draft remains critical in the 21st century. Today's U.S. military is by and large seen as the most built up, the most serious, the best-drove, and the most fit military on the planet. The all volunteer imperative has shown both successful and adaptable since it was set up in 1973, to consolidate the harshest test up to this point of its capacities the latest 15 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite the weights of reiterated associations to significantly asking for the fight to come circumstances, it remained for the most part all around controlled and convincing. A couple of people from Congress assume this astounding execution infers that the United States should annul the draft. Rep. Mike

Write an argumentative essay that addresses whether the Army is a profession of arms, what the criteria is, and what it means to be a member of that profession. Refresh and renew our understanding

In the era between the Second World War and the Vietnam War, national unity in the United States and American patriotism began to disintegrate and morph as the nation progressed from the 1940s through the 1970s. During WWII, the United States military fought a foe that the American public, and the world alike, saw as an enemy to the human race, which caused Americans to unify in their efforts to fight in the battle. In contrast, US military actions in Vietnam were not fully backed by the American public or American allies, in which caused many people from the country to lose trust and faith in America. Wars have points that define them. In WWII, it was the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese, which rallied a nation to come together and fight, citizens and soldiers alike. Where as, Vietnam it was the Gulf of Tonkin with North Vietnam, which left many Americans, and soldiers both, confused by the confrontation and unsure of what actions should be taken by their government. Both attacks prompted American officials to make decisions concerning the use of military force, but in each case the attacks appealed differently to American leaders and the American public. In the time period between the two wars the United States military had desegregated its forces. For the first time, African American and white soldiers fought on the front lines together and slept in the same barracks and this caused many African American soldiers to think about the Army differently. Although the

Nowadays, there is no military draft and, the U.S. Army is made up of a mix of full time and part time professional soldiers who are trained well, and compensated for their service (Mackey, 2014). United States Armed Forces have not fought a battle in their homeland since the 19th century, thus, a well regulated civilian militia is no longer a military necessity.

Webster’s dictionary defines the word profession as a type of job that requires special education, training, or skill. Many Soldiers would not consider the Army as a profession but a way of life. Some think the word profession belongs to everyday jobs like a plumber, mechanic, or doctor. Dr. Don M. Snider stated “the Army is a profession because of the expert work it produces, because the people in the Army develop themselves to be professionals, and because the Army certifies them as such” (Snider, D. M. 2008). In October 2010, the Secretary of the Army directed the Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) to lead an Army wide assessment of the state of the Army Profession. We have been at war as a Country for over a decade and the Army

Before Vietnam, America was an idealistic nation. That the United States fought wars for noble purposes and with honor was the word at home, ever since the country won its very first battle for independence. Despite increasingly brutal tactics and horror stories from the battlefield, civilians could rest assured, at least, that our boys were fighting the good fight to protect “essential human freedoms.” The issues began with Vietnam, when the country got into a war that it had difficulty winning--and in which its motivation for fighting was dubious, at best--that the American public began to have second thoughts. Vietnam was an ugly war on both the literal front and the idealistic one, and while no one, least of all America’s leaders, wanted to lose the country’s first war, general consensus was becoming, more and more, that America could not

Cyril Richard "Rick" Rescorla was a United States Army officer and private security officer originally from the United Kingdom who served in Northern Rhodesia and as a commissioned officer in the Vietnam War, where he was a second lieutenant in the United States Army. After the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, Rescorla began to worry about a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. When Rescorla asked Daniel Hill, a friend from Rhodesia that was trained in counter terrorism measures, how he would attack the building were he a terrorist, Hill asked to see the basement. The two walked down to the basement parking garage without being stopped by any visible security, Hill pointed to an easily accessible load-bearing column, explaining how easy it would be for an attack to be carried out in a similar manner. That year, Rescorla and Hill wrote a report to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which owns the site, insisting on the need for more security in the parking garage. Their recommendations, which would have been expensive to implement, were ignored (Stewart, 2002).

Over 300,000 depart military service each year and enter the civilian job market (Faurer, Rogers-Brodersen, & Bailie, 2014). Though the number of departing service members may seem sizeable, for perspective, the percentage of the United States population currently serving in the military is a mere 0.4%, or 1.3 million people (Defense Manpower Data Center, 2016). According to Faurer, Rogers-Brodersen, and Bailie (2014), the downsizing of military operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq hit the military services hard when congressional lawmakers swiftly started cutting budgets. As a result, and what Neuberg (2003) described as the fundamentally deterministic nature of cause and effect, the number of veterans entering the civilian job market increased.