Why Did The Aryan Invasion Really Happened?

Nomads were pastoralists found throughout Afro-Eurasia. Due to their strong military capabilities, they were able to conquer various regions from the classical and post-classical periods (600 C.E. to 1450 C.E.), including examples of Huns and Germanic invaders (those that brought down Rome in 476). The Mongols were a key nomadic group from 1200 to 1400. While they committed atrocities in conquest and spread their political control through much of Eurasia, the resulting Mongol state provided for diversity of cultures and advancements in trade and technology.

For years before Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany, he was overpowered with the idea of a perfect race. In his speeches, Hitler spread his beliefs in racial "purity" and in the superiority of the "Germanic race", what he called an Aryan, which is a "master race." Hitler pronounced that his race must remain pure in order to take over the world. For Hitler and the Nazis, the ideal "Aryan" was blond, blue-eyed, and tall.

Throughout the years, historians have found evidence to show that many ethnic groups were barbaric, like the Germanic tribes: Ostrogoths and Visigoths, or the nomadic tribes: Huns and Mongols. Though the evidence is strong to show the primitive nature of the Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Huns, the evidence is ambiguous for the Mongols. From what historians have collected — who they conquered and people they were close to conquering — they believe that Mongols were barbaric; however disagreements can be made, because of the lack of evidence and prejudices we have been raised along-side with. This can be shown in their military, their commerce, their laws, and how they rule their conquered lands.

About eight hundred years ago, during the thirteenth century a tribe from the grasslands of Asia conquered a great part of the world. The Mongols were illiterate and their history is complex to tell due to the lack of writing and their very complex language but it can be said that the Mongols were barbarians and brutal in the way that did what was necessary to conquer.

The migration of the Bantu people took place from western Africa to the majority of the southern half of the continent. The first group of Bantu people to migrate made villages along the Congo River. With the villages being intertwined with the dense rain forests, some groups continued to journey in search for better farming land. Those Bantu groups ended up heading south towards the eastern coast of Africa.

The Mongols could be seen as barbarians because of their military tactics used to cause people to fear them therefore making their conquests easier.

There was once a time in the south where there was slavery. SLAVERY. But, the U.S.A finally got rid of it after the Great American Civil War. So then all blacks were free, but were they really free? They often asked themselves this question as they found themselves sharecropping, in debt or hung up in Klan violence. But then God offered a way out, Kansas, where the deer and the antelope play. Blacks would be truly free and have a chance at a normal life. Then that’s when the blacks started migration, an exodus like Moses’, The Black Exodus.

The Mongols are arguably the best conquerors the world has ever seen. Through brutal military tactics and intimidating physiological warfare, they were capable of building the greatest land empire that the world has ever seen. The empire not only was fierce and cruel but they also brought about the rival of Silk Road trading which helped lead to their people to great economic prosperity. The Conrad-Demarest Model of an empire is a basic guideline that all of the empires are said to have to follow. In the Mongols, case they followed this model in the reasons for its fall and in the fact that it had militaristic and political preconditions in its rise, but it did

In 451 C.E, white Huns from central Asia invaded India and disrupted the gupta administration

The Mongols were able to conquer such a large territory within such a small time frame because of three main factors. The first was that the Mongols had a very ruthless mindset. They committed many acts that we would consider war crimes and immoral. The second was that the Mongols were very efficient and quick. They were very resourceful when dealing with resources, and their portability due to organization and their horses provided the Mongols with notable advantages over other armies.

The Mongolian warriors of the 14th Century C.E. have been described as ruthless, skilled, unforgiving, and efficient. But what really made a bunch of united tribes practically unstoppable? Was it a Nazi-esque totalitarianism? Nationalism? Did they emulate the born into warfare states like Sparta? The answer is, well, sort of. It’s more complex than any of those. It is a combination of attributes that can be observed over the course of history in many different countries, nations, states and peoples. Great leadership, excellent training, superior equipment, knowledge of the battlefield terrain, intelligence, and countless other war necessities existed in other armies, and the Mongols too possessed these things.

Furthermore, the Mongols were much like the Turks as they invaded India from the west and took pleasure in the destruction of sacred temples of Hindu gods that were built from the Indian ancestors of their time. The success of the Mongols in ruling vast territories and regions throughout the land was due in large part to their willingness to incorporate other ethnic groups into their armies and governments by allowing whatever their original country or religion to those who served the Mongols loyally would be rewarded. The only reason these men of the Mongol society fought and inflicted havoc upon other nations was to simply gain riches, by regularly looting the settlements they conquered and taking what they wanted from whomever they wanted (301). The Turks and Mongols were groups that both contained many of the same values and ideas and decided to merge together and by this, the Mongols decide to converted to Islam, and this would make a living hell for India and the coming events. Only Guptas in the fourth century would emerge to unite much of north India, although their rule was cut short by the invasion of the Huns in about 450 B.C.E., and despite these events, the lives of most Indian people would remained unchanged and the majority of the

The settlement of white Europeans in Australia was one of the most notable yet swept-under-the-rug events in history, just like other instances of he theft of land from rightful indigenous people. To Australia, Europeans brought with them disease, violence, and widespread turmoil, but also mechanic technology and advancements in communication and medicine. There are multiple sides to this debate, from the perspective of a native Australian, European invasion was horrific and ruined the natural order in place within the land, but a modern white man may say that settlement increased international ties and evolved the nation and functionality of Aboriginal life with

The desert-rich country of Mauritania has a complicated history. They have been controlled by various countries throughout their history. The country was originally inhabited by Black Africans; they date back to the Stone Age. They were quickly inhabited by Sanhaja Berbers who were Caucasoid people from North Africa. This society is dated back as far as the 3rd and 4th century. Therefore, most native people from Mauritania are of Berber descent.

The Mongols made multiple attempts to take control if the Indian Subcontinent, but they were always halted by the Delhi Sultanate. The Mongols were persistent in their attacks on Indian peninsula, with the first attack being launched during the reign of Emperor Ilitmish. Everyone knew about the brutality and strength of the Mongols, it was considered that “provoking the Mongol fury [was] inviting disaster” . When Jalāl al-dīn of Khwäriz, the last ruler of Khwarezmian Empire fled from Genghis Khan, he asked for asylum from Emperor Ilitmish of the Delhi Sultanate. Ilitmish refused asylum in the hope of earning Genghis Khan’s good faith . Another form to avoid the Mongols was to forge peace amongst each other through relationships. During the