The As A Student Of Human Rights

Every person deserves the right to experience a sense of community amongst people who share a common characteristic. A sense of fellowship amongst similar people allows a person to become more comfortable with who they are through interactions with others who are going through—or have gone through—the same triumphs or hardships. Without this feeling of belonging, one could be driven into insanity. Anxiety due to isolation and desolation could run rampant through a person’s mind because of the loneliness that comes with a lack of community—making it an essential part of a humanhood. By definition however, community invites inimitability. Community can be defined as a group of unique individuals with shared characteristics. From that a

Human rights are protected under Australian law in three key ways; statute law, the constitution and common law. It could be argued that if Australia adopted a bill of rights, human rights would be more clearly defined, consistent in all states and territories and more easily understood.

Taking in these multiple perspectives of community, I have learned through my life that community, as I understand it, is a group of people—the amount or cultural background may vary—that live in the same area—area being defined in multiple ways as well—that interact either directly or indirectly causing either mutual, commensal, or harmful

A great speech has the power to define the times, to inspire, and to motivate. Certain speeches from great people have made huge impacts, but “The Struggle for Human Rights” from Eleanor Roosevelt persuades the entire globe on humans’ rights, freedom, respect and peace. I read her text and saw a video on YouTube giving her speech even though it was long it gathered a lot my attention. It took me time to understand her speech after reading it three times. It’s good that someone like Eleanor Roosevelt existed and wanted to provide some peace to the world. I’m glad she touched many hearts in that time. War may still exist and can be caused but we should all take a glance to this speech and acknowledge what Eleanor was trying to do. She fought for social and civil rights, helped found the United Nations, and effectively ran the United Stated when her husband was ill. As shown above, all those awful situations led Eleanor Roosevelt to do such a speech as “The Struggle for Human Rights”.

Humans are social creatures. In isolation, we wilt and progress is nonexistent. From the traveling groups of cavemen to the carefully blocked out cities of today, humans have always known that sticking together is an essential component of a healthy social atmosphere. A community, therefore, is a group in which each member has the interests of the group in mind rather than each member’s personal interests. This can be demonstrated by the availability of social activities and other resources that serve to both unify existing members as well as recruit new ones.

uman rights are defined as “a right that is believed to belong justifiably to every person”. Human Rights are continually evolving and changing for the better, they are constantly reassessed and improved for the world’s greater good. Countless people have tried to define what a Human Right is and who they belong to, but we always seem to come across the same philosophers and documents that truly define Human Rights. John Locke was a famous English philosopher in the seventeenth centaury who believed in natural rights provided by a “higher power”. Another name often associated with Human Rights is Mahatma Gandhi was a famous civil rights activist, particularly known for the steps he took against discrimination in India, and the leader of infamous nonviolent protests for his campaign against discrimination. One of the most infamous documents written about human rights is The UN Declaration of Human Rights was written in 1948, and is one of the most popular references of basic Human Rights.

All people are entitled to various basic rights which should not be desecrated under any situation. Some of these rights include political rights, civil liberties and most importantly the right to physical safety and life. Human rights bodies articulate for tolerance, justice, human dignity and mutual respect for all people. Human rights are protected by ensuring that all people receive humane and decent treatment. Denying people their basic rights are violating them and it’s a terrible offense which can face a strict legal response. Everything that violates people’s rights or prevents them from enjoying ought to be eliminated with immediate effect.. Many people from all over the world cannot access some services due to poverty.

The definition of the term human rights is described as the essential universal entitlements afforded to all humans. These rights are the underpinning of certain principles including that of liberty, fairness and respect of human dignity. Human rights must be acknowledged and protected by government agencies to ensure that these rights are taken into account in law, the process of legislation, public policy and politics.1 However many groups within society remain marginalised and vulnerable to human rights violations. The focus issue that will be discussed in this essay is the right to liberty- to not be apprehended in arbitrary custody, which interferes with the inherent human right to liberty, and the chosen vulnerable group is asylum seekers. Due to circumstances outside of their control the persons in this group flee their homelands in an effort to escape crisis and persecution, such as religious and political persecution.2 Every human has the right of asylum, as stated in article 14 of the Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, however asylum seekers are vulnerable due to violations of their human rights. Governments around the globe including Australia have not fulfilled their legal obligations toward asylum seekers and have in fact violated human rights and specific rights of asylum seekers which have been outlined in the 1951 UN Convention in relation to status of refugees.3

The mistreatment of women in the Middle East desecrates the human rights Americans claim all should have. In the second article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.” 203 countries around the world recognize the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and are apart of the United Nations organization itself, if 203 countries agree to govern and provide the rights the Declaration states, then why must women in certain regions receive permission

The inherent driving force behind humanity’s actions is a need for companionship and belonging to a greater community to validate our existence. Man is a social creature who depends on other men to understand himself and the world. Society aids in confirming some sort of identity for ourselves; an identity is a certainty that is comforting to our existence. Humans prefer knowledge to ignorance in that the unknown is intimidating and unnerving. Living in a society furthers humanity’s intrinsic pursuit of knowledge, and thus humans organize themselves into communities for the greatest well-being for the most people.

All individuals are allow to certain basic rights in every part of the world. Without consideration of the circumstances, nobody has fairly or righteously impowered to take away these basic rights from ordinary citizens of particular country. The human rights are of different types of rights like, political rights and civil liberty rights. The most significant constitutional human right available to a human being of right to life and physical safety. According to Donnelly and Howard Human rights are the expression of the need for self respect, impartiality, legitimacy, integrity and just ness. The idea of human rights support the scope of justice and virtual. However,several organizational and country heads emphasize the need of women’s human rights and its violation has always been a common phenomenon in different parts of the world(Donnelly & Howard 1987).As, India is home to a growing democracy and to recent magnificent country economic growth. Unfortunately, this has not protected different kind of serious women’s human right abuses and it is remaining a fact of life in many parts of the India.

Human rights are the rights that every single human being on this planet has. However, there are multiple cases all over the world where these inherent rights are being violated. The Enlightenment era of European history allowed for the beginning of the consideration of these rights. One philosopher named Mary Wollstonecraft wrote about the many violations of rights for women in society. These violations have continued to occur up to the present day. One area where this oppression is occurring is India concerning the topic of teenage marriage. India holds 12th place in the world for child marriage and although tradition is changing to allow for women to be educated and marry later, this way of thinking is not consistent in all parts of India. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that everybody has “the right to marry and found a family… at full age”, yet India is home to thousands of unwanted and underage marriages. Underage marriage has many difficult repercussions, including restricted job opportunities for women. Traditions force young girls into marrying and having children very early, which creates a mental block where they can do nothing but take care of their family. This brings up the question, “to what extent is teen marriage limiting the job opportunities of women in India”? India is a very religious and traditional country where customs mean everything. Families usually marry their children to relatives for to a safe and

In the depths of shadows, in where no one dares to look, there often occurs some of the most unspeakable inhumane acts that could ever be possibly conceived. Perhaps, even more alarming, the shadows in which these atrocities occur are often cast by those institutions who have sworn to govern and protect the lives of people all across the globe. Yet, despite these oaths, governments have repeatedly justified their own shameless acts of cruelty in the name of security. Torture, under the guise of politics, essentially occurs when an individual is subjected to severe pain and suffering by the hands of someone in a position of authority. It, like shadows under a candlelight, can take on various forms: it can be either physical, psychological, or a mixture of both. Since the United Nations publication of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) torture has been internationally outlawed by over 156 countries (“Torture,” 2016, paragraph 3. This proclamation lists thirty articles regarding human rights and asserts that the underlying duty of all governmental bodies is to respect, protect, and promote the interests of these rights. However, regardless of this triumph, states continue to brutally disregard these moral rights, in particular, the prohibition against torture. It is here in where Amnesty International (AI), a non-governmental organization with global influence, comes into the fray by taking the initiative in investigating, exposing, and confronting governments on

While the concept of human rights was not first developed during the Enlightenment period it made great advances during this time due to the change in thinking that took place. According to Kocchar online, “The thinkers of the Enlightenment believed that human reason could discover the natural laws of the universe, determine the natural rights of humankind, and thereby achieve continuous progress in human knowledge, technology, and society.” (Lesson I) This description of the change in thought is key to the development of human rights during the Enlightenment. However, the application of science based reasoning had both positive and negative consequences in this development. While there were positive changes such as the abolition of torture and slavery, reform of the penal code and an increasingly universalistic application of human rights there was also the rise of biological based exclusion theory and a rise in ethnic nationalism which were purported by “scientific” theories developed during this time period.

Glendon, Mary Ann (2002). A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Random House. ISBN