The Asian Financial Crisis Of 1997

About fifteen years ago, around the time of the nineteen nineties, the Asian countries along with other countries around the world experienced an economic slump that resulted in a financial crisis. This came right after major investing and big spending had occurred in these countries. It is believed that the cause of this economic slump is because of the unpredicted economic growth that came upon these countries so quickly (W.L.Hill). However, it is projected that the Asian countries would be among the first to recover because of their ability to diligently manage money in hard times (Szustek).

The financial crisis of 2007-2009 resulted from a variety of external factors and market incentives, in combination with the housing price bubble in the United States. When high levels of bank and consumer leverage appeared, rising consumption caused increasingly risky lending, shown in the laxity in the standard of securities ' screening and riskier mortgages. As a consequence, the high default rate of these risky subprime mortgages incurred the burst of the housing bubble and increased defaults. Finally, liquidity rapidly shrank in the United States, giving rise to the financial crisis which later spread worldwide (Thakor, 2015). However, in the beginning of the era in which this chain of events took place, deregulation was widely practiced, as the regulations and restrictions of the economic and business markets were regarded as barriers to further development (Orhangazi, 2014). Expanded deregulation primarily influenced the factors leading to the crisis. The aim of this paper is to discuss whether or not deregulation was the main underlying reason for the 2007/08 financial crisis. I will argue that deregulation was the underlying cause due to the fact that the most important origins of the crisis — the explosion of financial innovation, leverage, securitisation, shadow banking and human greed — were based on deregulation. My argument is presented in three stages. The first section examines deregulation policies which resulted in the expansion of financial innovation and

The financial crisis that happened during 2007-09 was considered the worst financial crisis in the world since the great depression in the 1930s. It leads to a series of banking failures and also prolonged recession, which have affected millions of Americans and paralyzed the whole financial system. Although it was happened a long time ago, the side effects are still having implications for the economy now. This has become an enormously common topic among economists, hence it plays an extremely important role in the economy. There are many questions that were asked about the financial crisis, one of the most common question that dragged attention was ’’How did the government (Federal Reserve) contributed to the financial crisis?’’

The financial crisis of 2007–2008, also known as the Global Financial Crisis and 2008 financial crisis, is considered by some economists such as Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics and international business at New York University, Kenneth Rogoff, professor of economics and public policy at Harvard University, and Nariman Behravesh, chief economist and executive vice president for IHS Global Insight, to have been the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. All of them agreed that this is a “one in fifty years event”, however the latest Great Recession is not a typical cyclical recession of the World Economy and no doubt will last for more that usual two years (Business Wire, Reuters). The crisis played a significant role in the failure of key businesses, declines in consumer wealth estimated in trillions of U.S. dollars, and a downturn in economic activity leading to the 2008–2012 global recession and contributing to the European sovereign-debt crisis. (M. N. Baily, D. J. Elliott, 2009). So what are the cаuses of this crisis? Mаny factors dirеctly and indirectly caused the Great Recession, with expеrts plаcing different weights upon pаrticular causes. Major cаuses of the initial sub-prime mortgage crisis and following recession include: Internаtional trade imbalances and tax lending stаndards contributing to high levels of dеveloped

After a decade of sustained growth, the current situation in Thailand is one of unprecedented economic turmoil. The countries exports have halted, foreign investors have become hesitant with their money due to the account deficit, the stock market plummeted, and big loans made by banks have caused a large accumulation of debt. Typical causes of an economic crisis, such as: high debt, large current account deficit, deregulation of the banking industry without proper controls in place, and a semi-fixed exchange rate are all at the forefront of the nation’s current economic state.

During the lead up to the financial crisis of 2007-08, a term was coined to describe what was happening in the financial markets. The term was: Shadow Banking System. The creation of the term was attributed to economist and money manager, Paul McCulley, who described it as a large segment of financial intermediation that is routed outside the balance sheets of regulated commercial banks and other depository institutions (St. Louis Fed). In simpler terms, institutions that are in the shadow banking system are not regulated like commercial banks, and carry more risk due to their investments. Examples of shadow banking institutions are money market funds, mutual funds, hedge funds, etc. During the early 1990s, most American citizens didn’t know or never heard of money market funds or mutual funds; typically, the only people who knew of the “shadow banking system” were most likely senior officers at the big banks or individuals who were experts in the financial markets. However, that all changed. At the turn of the century, the shadow banking system started to gain steam and was growing at a faster rate than traditional banks. At the peak of its growth, right before the financial crisis, the shadow banking system, in terms of liabilities, was about 1.5-2 times larger than traditional banks (St. Louis Fed).

In 1997 the country’s exports were no longer booming and the Thai economy entered a unsafe and unpredictable phase. Foreign investors were skeptical about the current-account deficit and the big loans property developers. Bad debt continued to mount up and the stock market crashed to depths not seen in eight years. This caused the baht to fall prey to speculative attack. High debt, heavy borrowing, large current account deficit, and the semi-fixed exchange rate system all played a part to the Thai crisis.

Research into Thailand showed that Thailand’s budget deficit narrowed to $4.2 billion (USD) from $5.1 billion (USD) in 2009. This demonstrates that the government is committed to meeting its foreign debt obligations and has not overextended itself concerning external borrowing. The baht (Bt) will remain strong against the United States dollar and the Bank of Thailand (central bank) will continue to intercede in the market if necessary to limit currency instability. Thailand’s banking sector is currently in a healthy state. It is adequately capitalized and has recorded strong profits in the last couple of years. Thailand’s political risk remains high due to the impending passing of the king and the difficulties that the prime minister has had with the House of Representatives. The economic structure risk is minimal even though the GDP growth has been low in the recent years, but Thailand has demonstrated a strong rebound in 2010 (Economist Intelligence Unit: The Economist [EIU], 2011).

One of the most devastating aspects of the financial crisis of 2007-2008 to middle-class America was the crash of the housing market. Millions of Americans were affected and faced foreclosures on homes that were purchased with subprime mortgages. The impact of these mortgages varied state to state. Nevada, one of the countries leading tourist destinations, led the market in foreclosure rates and housing appraisal drops. The government 's false sense of security in regards to the economy and the predatory lending practices of big banks such as Bank of America, JP Morgan and Wells Fargo, impacted the housing market negatively and ultimately led to millions of people in debt and without a home.

The financial crisis of 2007–08, also known as the Global Financial Crisis, is considered by many economists to have been the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Mr. Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time, believed it was equally problematic in many ways; although unemployment only reached half the level due to the Fed’s actions combined with a $700B stimulus. It collapsed large financial institutions, and stock markets dropped to half their pre-crisis level. The surface cause was the bursting of the U.S. housing bubble, which had peaked in 2004, caused the values of securities tied to U.S. real estate pricing to plummet, damaging financial institutions globally.

Australia’s economy is one of the largest economies in the world, with a nominal GDP of over 2 trillion dollars. The Australian government has to deal with multiple issues in the macroeconomic world to achieve three goals. The factors affecting these goals have to be identified and either harnessed or blocked by the government. The Global Financial Crisis of 2007/08 also caused the Australian government to deal with its failure to reach its macroeconomic goals.

“The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences” By John Bellamy Foster and Fred Magdoff Monthly Review Press, 2009, 160 pages

The Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 is the worst financial crisis since the 1930’s The Great Depression (Reuters, 2009). Even if bailouts of banks by national governments prevented the collapse of major financial institutions, worldwide stock markets continued to drop. Evictions and foreclosures overwhelmed the housing market while severed unemployment embraced the labor market (Baily and Elliot, 2009). This global financial crisis was responsible for the decline in the consumers’ wealth, and contributed to the great recession and European debt-crisis (LA Times, 2012). Varying opinions have been suggested to address the origin of the global financial crisis including conflicting of interests, complicated financial instruments,

The Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 was considered to be the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression in the decade preceding World War II. The Global Financial Crisis threatened large range of the financial organizations. Although the central banks and other banks were trying to keep away from the crisis, the stock market still suffered a huge decline internationally. Other than the global stock market, the house market was also influenced greatly, causing the unemployment, relocation and even the foreclosures. There was absolutely no doubt that the 2007/8 financial crisis brought failure and hard time to the business all over the world, especially the capitalist counties in North America and Europe. Many factors had been discussed to be directly and indirectly caused the Great Recession in 2007 to 2008. After some deep analyses done by the economists and experts, the developed country household debt with the Real estate bubble caused by the low tax lending standards, was the most public belief that people considered as the major cause of the financial crisis. But, who and what was going to be responsible for The Financial Crisis of 2007-2008?

The Asian Financial Crisis was a period of financial crisis that gripped much of Asia beginning in July 1997, and raised fears of a worldwide economic meltdown (financial contagion). It is also commonly referred to as the IMF crisis.