The Assessment Of The Mbti Survey

This isn't the first time I've taken a MBTI test. My first time was in college at the University of West Florida back in 1993. Honestly, then, I didn't answer the questions as I am, but as I wanted to be. I suffered for that. I manipulated the test then, and got a result of ENFP. I tried to live to that standard, and it nearly killed me. I thought for a while, that I really was that person. I thought maybe I had just changed over time. Looking back, I see that I was who I am. I am an INTJ. This is where I am comfortable. This is where I can find rest and be who I am. There's nothing wrong with who I am.

According to the course syllabus we were introduced to the techniques of psychological research. This course was able to provide an understanding of how research is done, and what methods we can use to do so. By having a clear understanding of research and techniques used, it allows us to communicate effectively in regards to ideas behind the research process. In this paper, I will use myself as the case study to examine exactly what I learned about research.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality (MBTI) was developed by Briggs Myers and her mother Katharine Cook Briggs in 1943 during the onset of World War II (Ham, 2016). Briggs recognized the need for psychological instruments that would value human differences and utilized the C G Jungs theory in creating the MBTI (The Story of Isabel Briggs Myers, n.d). According to The Myers & Briggs Foundation (2014) Myers and Briggs initially tested a group of 20 relatives and friends. They utilized such sample, because they thought they could predict their personality solemnly on observation which by observation. The initial random sample did not truly represent a whole population, but merely were used due to availability.

As I reviewed my MBTI results, most of my percentages have not drastically changed over time. This gives me continued confidence in the following MBTI results which indicate I am an ?ISTJ?: introvert (16%), sensing (9%), thinking (31%) and judging (53%) (Jung Typology Test, 1998-2017).

A person’s personality is his or her essence. It is what guides decisions, emotions, and even thoughts. Some may wonder if it is possible to explore every nuance of such a complex part of a being, but there are ways to determine what type of personality a person has, and then branch off into a more detailed examination of that person specifically. Combined with other factors, such as personality disorders and the environment that someone has grown up in, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, or MBTI, test (Enrichment 1) and analysis can determine an accurate portrayal of a personality. Created in 1943 by Katherine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers, it is a system made up of four basic functions and sub functions that combine to make a personality type. The mother and daughter team constructed it off of Jung’s theories (History 2). Based on this system, one of the most common personality types in the US population is called an ESTJ, and one of the least common personality types is called an INFJ. There are many differences and similarities between these two types. An ESTJ personality, overall, is practical, fact-based, and outgoing, whereas an INFJ personality is more private and makes decisions based on feelings; however, both are organized people who make good leaders and are capable of great success in roles that involve helping others.

The MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) has given me insightful information over 4 different dichotomies: 1)Where I focus my attention 2) How I take in information 3) How I make decisions based on the information and 4) How I deal with the world. After completing the assessment, I was dubbed ‘INTJ’. This being 9% Introvert, 38% iNtuitive, 3% Thinking, and 31% Judging. To my surprise, after reading the detailed report, I found most of the information presented, to be ‘spot on’. According to the Center for Confidence and Well-Being, “Of all the personality types, INTJs are most motivated by “vision”. They have a great need to come up with a unifying idea of a future, improved state, which is then their job to realize. This inner vision can be so strong for INTJs and so individual that they are often reckoned to be the most independent-minded of all the types” (Craig, C., 2014). This provided me with great validation that I have been lucky enough to find myself in the right career. Currently, I am the interim Director of Quality at an acute care hospital in San Diego. Daily, myself and my team are looking for ways to improve hospital processes, systems, and relationships. Always striving for a future vision or ‘ideal state’ of how we would like to see our organization functioning to better serve our community. Many people have told me that they could ‘not do what I do’ simply because of the data collecting, analyzing, reporting, and

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) “is an introspective self-report questionnaire designed to indicate psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions” (13). It is one of several personality assessments that is popular among modern mental health experts throughout the world. Currently, it is estimated that the MBTI is “taken by more than two million people per year and is translated into 16 languages (10). “The purpose of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality inventory is to make the theory of psychological types described by C. G. Jung understandable and useful in people 's lives” (4).

The MBTI helps me to understand my team; it helps me identify their strengths and weaknesses just like mine. It also helps me to avoid major conflicts by understanding why they do the things they do. Also to understand what might be a strength to me could be a weakness to them, and that everyone is different.

My conformed Myers-Briggs Indicator Type was ENFJ. As a leader I think I tend to be

According to the assigned assessment, my reported MTBI is ESFJ. The ESFJ is consistent to what I actually am. I am outgoing and friendly to others (extraversion); People often tell me how charismatic and animated I am. I also like things organized and together, and I am very firm in my beliefs. Helping others when I can is something I also enjoy to do. Conceptual and theoretical ideas bother me, as I prefer concrete and factual ideas when I am learning or trying to analyze something. All of these traits are consistent with the type ESFJ. The 16personalities.com describes this personality as “The Counsel.”

My MBTI Type is ESFJ, which means that I am extroverted, sensing, feeling, and judging. This means that I enjoy being equal and in charge. This means that I see problems clearly and delegate easily, that I am a hard worker and I play with zest. ESFJs, usually use the SJs, which allows them to be strong allegiant to having rights. It also means that they voluntarily provide service and hopefully expect the same thing by others. When ESFJs are wounded they usually close off their emotions, they are strong and have a sense of what’s right from what is wrong, when they make a decision they want to make sure that they look for the best possible outcome when making the decision, and lastly they are caretakers and which means that their sense of danger

Looks very simple, but to me, it changes me a lot.There before I did not do any questionnaire survey.Also when I received a questionnaire, I just click it one to one. I have never thought that this is very important to the person who makes the questionnaire survey.Form our group questionnaire survey,I know the importance of it.When I gave the questionnaire to the investigator, my feeling is I hope they can pay attention to this survey and they can seriously complete this form.At the beginning, I felt nervous because I did not know how to give them and how to talk to them.But under my group members help, they helped me to talk to them and let me make more friends.

The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) enables an individual to gain a deeper insight into their inherent personality traits. For some people, they have had prior knowledge or underlying assumptions about their personality, but this test provides clearer information about each of their identifiable traits. According to the MBTI in Human-metric personality test, my scores were 22% (E) extroverted thinking more than introverted, 9% (N) intuitive as oppose to sensing, 16% (T) thinking more than feeling, and 12% (J) judging as compared to perceiving. Thus, my personality type is ENFJ. The ENFJ personality group is described as a minority group that consists of natural-born leaders, and people filled with passion, and charisma for example, Barack Obama and Oprah Winfrey; they are notable members of this group, also known as the protagonists (16personalities, 2016). The protagonists apprehend pride in providing guidance for others to improve individually and to improve the community at large (16personalities, 2016). The protagonists find it naturally easy to communicate with others and excel at communicating with other people in person (16personalities, 2016).

Given that the four surveys determine an individual’s skill/motivation to take charge and the ability to manage subordinates, based on their level of communication. I believe that the survey’s outcomes were favorable and accurate in my case. Considering statements such as “I’m optimistic about life, and I can see beyond temporary setbacks and problems” and “I think that personal feelings shouldn 't be allowed to get in the way of performance and productivity” are some of my main ideologies that I apply. For example, I worked at a computer repair shop and working in a setting where team collaboration was a major aspect of the job. Each member of the team had a certain job to fulfill and in some cases, I had to work on my own and other team members repairs. Initially, it was difficult to handle but as time went on I kept a positive attitude regardless of the circumstances and didn’t let my personal feelings interfere with the quality of my work and ability to communicate with coworkers. At my work, we rely on clear and concise communication because the liability of the product and reputation of the store is massively reliant on the work we provide as a team. Furthermore, my strengths also include the ability to perceive feedback as a learning experience and to further improve on the feedback I ask for examples to completely understand the issue and try to improve on that. This heavily applies to my work due to customers/coworkers feedback being the

Instrumentation: The survey will be designed in an English version to ensure that all of the customers can read and understand the questionnaires (Bryman & Bell, 2015). The content of the survey will be divided in four different parts. Part 1 will measure consumers’ assessments of the restaurant environment as well as the atmospherics. It covers ten characteristics which reflect the dimensions of restaurant atmospherics. Additionally, these characteristics will be termed as ‘statements’ that reflect participants’ interpretations of the environment as well as the atmospherics. Then, there will be a five-point Likert measure ranging from 1 (strongly-disagree) to 5 (strongly-agree) to be selected as their responses. Part 2 would be four questions that will measure the consumers’ dining satisfaction level. The survey questions would be; how satisfied are you with the spatial layout of the restaurant?, how satisfied are you with the ambience settings of the restaurant?, how satisfied are you with the service provided in this restaurant, and how satisfied are you with the overall dining experience in this restaurant?. There will be a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very-dissatisfied) to 5 (very-satisfied) to be selected as their responses. Part 3 will be three questions which will measure the consumers’ behavioural intensions. The sample questions would be, how likely will your recommend this restaurant to other people?, how likely will you spend more next time?, and how