The Athenian Jury In The Apology

The Apology is assumed to be the most realistic account that has been conserved of Socrates ' defense of himself as it was presented before the Athenian Council. It is in essential agreement with the references to the trial that occur in Plato 's other dialogs. We may determine that Apology is not written by Socrates and only contains the words of Socrates that were memorized by Plato, since he was present at the time of the trial. However, we know that Socrates was Plato’s teacher and had been admired by him a lot. We should bear in mind that Plato’s views about Socrates’s trial could be biased. But on the other hand it is quite possible that Socrates ' defense of himself was even convincing than what has been reported by Plato. The charges against Socrates were brought by two type of accusers, the older and ancient ones and the later brought by Anytus, Meletus and others who were present at the time of trial. We’ll discuss all the charges one by one and what did Socrates say in his defense.

The Apology was written by Plato as an account of the defense that Socrates presented during the trial in which he was condemned to death. Socrates gave this apologia, or defense of one’s actions, against the accusations that he did not believe in any gods, and that he was corrupting the young men of Athens. Not being as skillful in the art of oratory as his accusers, Socrates admitted that he would, as plainly as possible, present only truthful and logical refutes to the accusations that were against him. Being wise in the way of rhetoric, Socrates used pathos, ethos, and logos to argue in his defense. Although ultimately executed, Socrates masterfully defended himself in court and proved that he was a man of both virtue and wisdom.

In the Apology Socrates is a very simple man he is Plato’s favorite character based on his personality of appearance. To convey his ideas about honesty and rightness. The peculiar of a method applied in Apology is about an argument which Socrates used to expressed by Plato in The Apology (Steven 29p) uses to defend himself in the course of a court-martial. Plato’s Apology is an example of how Socrates speech makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the city, The complaint of Socrates is based on fear people of the man’s thinking which inspires the youth by original ideas and exposure of the ignorance and corruption in the unawareness and dishonesty in the upper circles of the state. Socrates

He knows that when he is put to death, they will be the ones at a loss of his knowledge and true wisdom. He still believes he has gained no reasons to think that he can lose in death as his acts were not for material gain (28-29). Socrates has shown no fear for being hated by the majority of Athens, yet still finds himself being accused of serious crimes leading to his death.

The Apology of Socrates by Plato, is the dialogue that tells the story of Socrates legal self-defense, where he represents himself at his trial for impiety and corruption in 399 BC. Throughout the book Socrates tries to maintain his innocence. Apology of Socrates is essentially a defense against the charges of “corrupting the youth, not believing in gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia that are novel to Athens” (24b) Socrates challenges each of the charges he is brought up against. Socrates is brought up on three charges, corrupting the youth, challenging belief in the gods that were accepted and reveled by the State, and introducing a new religious

The Apology presents a dialogue that eludes to Socrates’ accepting law breaking under certain circumstances. Socrates is depicted as a man who stands for what he believes in, regardless of the law. Socrates expresses this to the jury stating, “I, men of Athens, salute you and love you, but I will obey the god rather than you” (Apology, 29d2-3) Socrates even could be seen as pardoning disobedience here. Socrates continues in the Apology to defy the potential ruling of the jury by stating that, “I shall never cease from the practice and teaching of philosophy, exhorting anyone whom I meet after my manner, and convincing him…” (Apology, 29d). The charges being discussed are that of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of the state, but Socrates disagreed with the heavily. Socrates, regarding his teaching and lifetime of work, stated, “For this is the command of God, as I would have you know; and I believe that to this day no greater good has ever happened in the state than my service to the God” (Apology, 29d). Thus, the Apology presents a theme that to do what one believes regardless of the civil implications, but only when pursuing a moral decision.

The Trial and Death of Socrates recounts his attempt to persuade the jury that he has committed no wrongdoing. Socrates has been charged with creating new gods, not acknowledging existing gods recognized by the state, and negatively influencing Athens’s youth. While the narrative is titled “The Apology,” that word poorly describes Socrates’s argument for his innocence. In fact, he continuously makes many statements which may lead people to believe that he is above the law itself. Throughout his plea, Socrates refuses to believe that he is at fault while confidently speaking quite highly of himself. Most people on trial create arguments that would appeal to the jury, but not Socrates. He firmly stands by his beliefs even though they lead him

In his writings, Plato wants to explain why Socrates accepted the penalty of death from the Athenian court. This is very important because Plato wanted Socrates to be seen in a positive, glorified light. In the public eye, why would Socrates be convicted if he were not guilty of failing to serve the gods and of swaying the youth? Also, why would he submit to the court’s ruling unless he thought he deserved the punishment? Not only the general public, but also Socrates’ followers and friends were concerned and wanted to know the answers to these questions. Thus, Plato writes about Socrates’ confusion about the charges about impiety, his defense, and his sense of duty to his city’s laws in a way that is designed to make Socrates seem appealing to the Athenian people. While accomplishing this goal, Plato almost defines the relationship between the individual and the society and the relation of state and religion.

“The Apology” epitomizes Socrates acuities in a trial in 399 BC. Plato incorporates the word “apologia” to illustrate the view, life, and events of the character Socrates. The publication provides a chronological explanation of the life of Socrates in the following ways. First, Socrates acknowledges that he almost became unaware of his character while addressing the Athen’s Populace. The prologue, therefore, creates the direction and the tone of the ensuing dialogue. Thus, the introductory section enables the audience to develop a sense of understanding the character, motives and the perceptions regarding the false accusations of representing a sophist and physicalist ideas. Therefore, Socrates speaks the plain language to counter the false

The Apology written by Plato precisely presents Socrates’ defence at his trial on charges of corrupting the youth of Athens. He failed to recognize the state gods and invented new deities. Socrates explains in a very plain manner his method and motivation which earned him admiration amongst the Athens youth. He argues that his admiration made some people to dislike him, including his prosecutor. In our modern understanding of the word “apology”, Socrates’ defence is not an apology by any means (Plato 21).

Plato’s The Apology is the speech made by Socrates at the time of his trial. The charges that he faced were corrupting the Athens youth, dishonoring the gods

In reading, The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates presents himself against “the majority” and endures prosecution for inventing new gods and not believing in old ones. Socrates lives a life that is opposite of much of the “the majority” ideals. “The majority” values goods, possessions, and uncontrollable attributes given to them by others such as a high reputation and honor. In addition, The Greek Philosopher was able to refuse the opportunity to escape his death sentence while he had sons at home because he does not see death as the greatest evil and provided his sons a positive role model. He showed calmness in the face of his trouble, while the vulnerable and fragile majority would have been in constant fear of death. Socrates, in saying goodbye to Crito in his cell “Then let it be, Crito, and let us do as I say, seeing that God so directs us.” (Plato, 102)

Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech Socrates makes at the trial where he is charged for various reasons; not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates did not win over the jury pleading his case, and was therefore sentenced to execution. It can be said that Plato’s Apology of Sokrates, although an unsuccessful attempt at defending Socrates on the charges of corruption the youth of Athens, is a successful defense of the philosophical statement, ‘the unexamined life isn’t worth living for a human being.’

In 388 BC, with a vote of 280 to 220, Socrates was sentenced to death. The Phaedo is the famous account of Socrates’ death, where he offers his grieving friends many different arguments to justify his belief in the immortality of the soul, and that “it is only the body they will bury”. Socrates believes that one who has “devoted his life to philosophy should be confident in the face of death, and hopeful of winning the greatest prizes in the next world after death”. His rather optimistic attitude towards death is justified by his belief that “either death is a state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness” or it is the “change and migration of the soul from this world to another” and so death should not be feared. To back up his claim, he uses the Argument from

The writings of Plato compare Socrates to various everyday beings which he represents. In the "Apology" tells the story of the trial of Socrates and the various people who testified to his being a danger to the society and that he was guilty of corrupting Athenian youth. In