The Australian Red Cross Blood Service Essay

In conclusion, there are many reason why donating blood is something everyone. In the United States an average of 40,000 units of blood are needed every day. Around 60% of population will need blood at some time in their lives, yet only around 5% of the population will actually donate blood. If all eligible donors will donate on a regular basis, which I six to four times a year, all blood needs would be meet and blood shortages would be a thing of the

Nicky Santos, S.J., a visiting scholar at the Ethic Center, claims that people who are desperate often make decisions that are not the most beneficial for themselves, which then results in the rich having the privilege of excellent health care while the poor do not. There is also the “do no harm” rule in bioethics that forbid procedures that might harm donors. The question lies in whether we can make sure that donors’ health won’t be jeopardized in the transaction. On the contrary, some might say that not giving donors incentives actually put their health to more risk since no incentives have been given to pay for their medical bill in case the donors are harmed. There has also been debates about whether organ donation should remain as an act of altruism or should we instead move along to justice. While some might value such humanity and hate the idea of it being

'Proponents of financial incentives for organ donation assert that a demonstration project is necessary to confirm or refute the types of concerns mentioned above. The American Medical Association, the United Network for Organ Sharing and the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons have called for pilot studies of financial incentives. Conversely, the National Kidney Foundation maintains that it would not be feasible to design a pilot project that would definitively demonstrate the efficacy of financial incentives for organ donation. Moreover, the implementation of a pilot project would have the same corrosive effect on the ethical, moral and social fabric of this country that a formal change in policy would have. Finally, a demonstration project is objectionable because it will be difficult to revert to an altruistic system once payment is initiated, even if it becomes evident that financial incentives don 't have a positive impact on organ donation. '(http://www.kidney.org/news/newsroom/positionpaper03)

Our nation has a major blood shortage which results in a national health crisis. States all over the nation are reporting the need for blood donors and the importance of having donors to help those who are directly affected. There has been a recent rise in shortage due to the increased demand of high complex surgeries which require a large supply of blood. McMillan reports, “just one liver transplant can take 120 units of donated blood” (Zabarenko, 2016). It is imperative to bring attention to this social problem, and begin to search for possible solutions, as well as identifying gaps in the policy before seeking policy revision. Experts indicate that “the only solution is for this problem is to persuade people to become donors” (Nagourney, 2009).

The significant disparity between the supply and demand of tissues and organ donors in Australia, with 1 donor for every 1600 that are in need, established the need for an advertising campaign that targeted the particular social groups that were most opposed to organ donation.

The goal of the Red cross is to help people in need whether it is providing shelter, food or clothing. All these things do make a difference.

In order for the Canadian Blood Services to meet the demand of blood needed to serve patients, the CBS must increase the amount of donors that give blood. The demand for blood continues to rise. Finding ways to attract people to donate blood can be problematic so that finding incentives for people to donate can be a difficult task.

At first I didn’t even care about the assembly I was sitting through. Everyone else I had talked to had decided against participating, so I decided that I wasn’t going to either. However, as I sat and listened to the woman talk, and saw how sincere she was, I began to listen with a new interest. Then she put a video on featuring stories of the people and families this affected. There was one in particular about a little girl who had gotten in a car accident and would have died had she not received a blood transfusion. Due to a blood drive held earlier that day, the little girl’s life was saved. It was then that I made my decision. I was going to donate blood.

Most organ programs appeal to the altruistic incentives of possible donors, however these donors who are willing to do such a selfless act are not high in numbers. Resulting in a shortage of organs for transplants, reducing the amount of lives that have the potential to be saved or enhanced to have better living conditions. Thus causing this issue to be looked at on a more serious note, and seek options to increase organ transplant rates. With this issue on the rise one incentive that is being debated is whether organ donors should receive compensation. As there are two sides to this argument whether compensation is ethical or unethical, due to several lives on the line, the act of recompense to an individual who decides to become an organ donor is highly

] Following a wide initiative throughout the country, the task force revealed that there is great willingness among the people to donate under the current system, and that moving to an opt-out system sooner may benefit but carries a significant risk of making the current situation worse. This is due to the fact that many people have fears or skepticism about organ donation based on misconceptions that need to be dispelled. Furthermore, there is extremely low awareness of the organ donor register. There is a strong need to publicise the register and to make the process of registering easier and more widely understood.[ Organ Donation Taskforce. (2008).The Potential Impact Of An Opt Out System For Organ Donation In The UK, An Independent Report From The Organ Donation Taskforce, 31-35.

The line between Gifts, Commodities, and Human Tissues, exists in a small space between economy and altruism. In the piece, “Human Tissues,” Mitchell Waldby (2006) explores the historic relationship between body politic and the idea of national community. Through times of war and national devistation, such as the attacks on the twin towers in 2000, blood donation has increased by numbers unforeseen in times when no disasters were occurring. Blood donation seen as a social duty in these times, that also helps to create relationships between individuals. The latter relationship which in some ways can be related back to the relationship that is formed through ‘gift’ giving. A gift seen as a way to give someone something that is in essence some

“Every 10 minutes, someone is added to the waiting list for an organ transplant and an average of 22 people die every day while waiting (“FACT SHEET: Obama Administration Announces Key Actions to Reduce the Organ Waiting List”).” Potential donors are often interested in donating a kidney, but are hesitant because their loved ones could need one in the future. Altruists are people who do not see any less value in a stranger’s life than in the lives of their loved ones. A stranger or acquaintance should not be viewed as any less deserving of resources. Upham said: “He met the woman who received his kidney at the hospital three days after the transplant and she died three months later of a stroke”, but Upham had no regrets. Donating one

Inhumane activity is the overall reason why this proposal is for increasing organ donations which are frequently rejected by incongruities with solidarity motivation as donor’s measures. It differentiates ethical principal amongst altruism and solidarity motivations for organ donations. The first issue being the grounds is a limited form of additional problems limited to supporters (Saunders, 2012), which may be independent or of individual groups, awaiting for the scarcity of organs to receive the next available transplantation. Individuals are practicing degrading behaviors, illegal activity, and

Just imagine if one of your brothers or sisters was born with a heart defect and had to have daily transfusions of blood in order to have a chance of survival. Unfortunately, things happen like this everyday and some of you may have experienced them already. In this essay I am going to persuade you to become a blood donor. I try to donate blood every two months or so because it makes me feel like I am doing something good and saving people’s lives. Do you know that 95% of all Americans will need a blood transfusion sometime in our lives (Red Cross web site)? That statistic means that there is a possibility that you, and your family and friends could need support from volunteer blood donors. In this essay I will discuss the need for blood donations, solutions that can increase blood donations, and actions that need to be taken to increase blood donations.

With one in three Australian’s needing blood in their lifetime, but only one in thirty donating, the need for the Australian Red Cross Blood Service to maximise donor recruitment and retention has never been greater. Young adults are a largely untapped source of potentially long serving donors. In this field of study, virtually no Australian research has targeted this segment and, combined with international