preview

The Authoritarian Regime In The Giver

Decent Essays
Open Document

A dystopian novel is a subgenre that means the protagonist and his/her friends are living in an environment that is not a good place to live (ie a desert or in a dictatorship.) Sometimes the world they live in is fine but there is an authoritarian regime that is in power at the time that the book or movie takes place. They usually want to make the protagonists’ lives worse than it already is in the society.The Fire sermon is about a character named Cass who wants two groups of people called the Omegas and the Alphas be equal. She tries to find other omegas and form a resistance. There is a fight and it comes to peace. The Giver is a story close to a utopia and the elders choose everything that you do like your job and if you get something …show more content…

This is kind of like in real life too, when one person in your family does something terrible, you have to live in the grief and you will also get a lower reputation for something that someone else did. In the giver though, the authoritarian regime is themselves because you are taught what to do and what not to do and when you make a mistake you are basically punishing yourself since you have been through this so much times. “They want us all in the tanks, eventually. Every Omega.” The tanks are a series of containers that keep the Omegas inside and the reason they do this is because if something happens to the Omega which the Alphas think are dumb, the alpha has to pay for it too which convinced them to make tanks. Lots of Omegas were put into tanks when Cass found Kip and wondered what it was and why she wasn’t put in there. This reveals that the Alpha Council thinks she is important to them and can help them a lot. “They would have been disbelieving, though nobody dodged the split between Alpha and Omega.” Every time someone is born, there is an omega and an alpha and if there is a deformity, they are branded the omega and sent away. He remembered the cheerful voice call out, ''I want my smack!'' (...)But the mistake had been made. And precision of language was one of the most important tasks of small children. Asher had asked for a smack. (30) When Asher was a Three (Three Years-Old), he said at snack time: “I want my smack” when he meant to say I want my “snack”. But he couldn’t rewind his mistake and he got a smack and one every day because he kept saying smack. "Because it's a memory from the time when color was. It was so — oh, I wish language were more precise! The red was so beautiful!" This shows language is important in the

Get Access