Lgbtq Community Essay

Abstract: SMY (sexual minority youth, which refers within this paper to youth who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, or queer) are at risk for trauma in particularly high numbers. When SMY become homeless, their risk for exposure to trauma becomes even higher, presenting the helping professions with a population that faces unique problems in clinical settings that may seek to treat homelessness without considering minority stress and repeated exposure to trauma. We reviewed literature concerned with trauma, homelessness and SMY issues to determine which EBPs (evidence-based practices) have been deemed most helpful for this population and found very few. Our investigation into local resources available to homeless SMY was similarly discouraging. Since previous trauma and marginalized sexual orientation are the primary factors for continued risk, we can suggest that Trauma Informed Care and Gay Affirmative Cognitive Behavioral Therapy are currently our best choices. This paper will seek to explore why.

The mental health of individuals in the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered) community is something that is a serious problem. For most of the history of the United States and many different parts of the world LGBT people faced much persecution and in some cases even death. This constant fear of discovery and the pressure that one feels on oneself when “in the closet” can lead to major mental distress. Research has shown that people who identify as LGBT are twice as likely to develop lifetime mood and anxiety disorders (Bostwick 468). This is extremely noticeable the past couple years in the suicides of bullied teens on the basis of sexual identity and expression. The stigma on simply being perceived as LGBT is strong enough to

Appleby, G A., & Anastas, J.W. (1998). Not just a passing phase: Social work with gay, lesbian and bisexual people (pp. 3–43, 44-75). New York: Columbia University Press.

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) falls within societal minority groups such as low income, people of color, and disables (AHRQ, 2011). Due to their gender identity, discrimination, violence, and even denial of human rights and healthcare services is a common challenge among LGBT population. LGBT still faces many health disparities primarily related to the historic bias of healthcare professionals anti-LGBT manners even though society acceptance has been favorable. According to Ard and Makadon (n.d), “until 1973, homosexuality was listed as a disorder…, and transgender still is.” This stigma prevents healthcare professionals to openly ask questions in a non-judgmental manner related to sexual identity. On the other hand, if the patient senses that the healthcare environment is discriminating they may be reluctant to disclose important information as their sexual orientation; thus, missing important opportunities of been educated about safety and health care risks.

LGBTQ adolescents, also called sexual minority youth, have a higher risk of developing mental and emotional problems than heterosexual youth, and also face more bullying, harassment, and victimization due to homophobia (Craig, Austin, & McInroy, 2014). In order to address their needs, the researchers used group therapy that was based on

Many LGBTQI Latinx lack appropriate mental health care due to the many external factors that include structural competency and the social determinants of health and clinical intervention. Structural competency is the medical education of understanding the stigma and inequities among marginalized diverse communities in order to reduce poor health outcomes of the specific community (Metzl, 2014). Specifically, structural competency focuses on the whole population, rather than, the

Expressions such as efforts to “cure” Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals were heard from social workers in the Canadian context several years ago (Carniol, 2010), today this expression has changed slightly because heterosexism, oppression, and discrimination remain in social work education (Dentano, et al., 2016). Canada is a country that has protected sexual minorities rights and has a well-known recognition for its “inclusivity” (Langstaff, 2011, as cited in Rayside, 2014). Therefore, there is an enormous incongruity between discourse and practice. This paper will first analyze why these inequalities continue to abound in social work education as a social issue in Canada, and how the prevailing heteronormative framework is perpetuated despite academy efforts towards equality and diversity. Second, it will explain by a critical self-reflection the interrelation between my social location and the areas of LGBT-social work academia. Third and last, the role, responsibility, and current challenges as a social work professional to deconstruct the heteronormative discourse by the use of anti-oppressive approach and queer theory as pedagogical methods in social work education.

he status of the LGBTQ community in each decade, starting in the early 1900s, held many key leaders,

Sexual and social stigmas largely affect the health of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) population. While many reports from the Institute of Medicine, Healthy People 2020 and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recognize a need to improve the quality of health care, barriers still remain. LGBT patients face legal discrimination, especially with insurance, a lack of social programs, and limited access to providers competent in LGBT health care. Although the Affordable Care Act increased access to care for LGBT patients, unless these patients feel understood by providers and develop trust in the system, they are not likely to utilize care. Healthcare providers need to recognize how these vulnerabilities, as well as persistent racism and stigma linked to sexual orientation and gender identity, make the healthcare needs of LGBT patients more challenging than the general population. Healthcare providers also need to promote cultural competence within this population and broaden their clinical lens to include health promotion, in addition to addressing concerns mentioned above within the population. Additionally, medical and nursing schools need to ensure that future providers are adequately educated by including information about this population in the curriculum.

Those studies lead to the societies criticism on social work practice. Studies state, the child welfare systems fluctuate on their effectiveness of helping children (Glisson, Green, & Williams, 2012), which reflects on the lack of efficiency on organizations role. When the state becomes implicated in placing the child for adoption/foster care and/or deciding custody arrangements, all states focus on seeking for the “best interests of the child.” (Wald, 2006). There is a need for actual nondiscrimination policies, finest practices procedures, and additional sources that can bring shifts (Estrada & Marksamer, 2006); shifts that are needed within the child welfare system in regards to social workers practice and the LGBTQIA+ community. Despite systems being designed to ensure fair treatment and equality, the LGBQTIA+ live in a society where laws have been voted for resulting in limiting their rights (Crisp & McCave, 2007). Unfair treatment and inequality are two sectors of discrimination that the LGBQTIA+ community undergoes within agencies as the child welfare system. Focusing on barriers and biases within agencies as the child welfare system (Mountz, 2010) are vital to analyze the services provided.

Sexual minorities, often called LGBTQ or just ‘gays’, of Korea have been ignored. The hatred towards LGBTQ people was so much for them that they couldn’t stand like heterosexual people and couldn't come out of the closet. Although there is no reason that LGBTQ people must come out to their families and friends, coming out is thought to be a custom to most people. However, as this article points out, LGBTQ members of Korea and people who are not sure about their sexualities tend to stay away from the issue.

In summary, racially marginalized groups define and reinforce respectability through their adherence to the dominant society’s cultural norms, values, and practices, which are defined largely as (white) middle-class standards of living and sexuality in the realms of community and family. These strategies allow racial minorities to claim their membership in the larger society and at the same time, construct a positive sense of their racialized selves by minimizing (or simply managing) their stigma as racial subordinates. Further, as these studies show, the exact strategies employed by LGBT members of each racial minority group may differ, but they all refer to their heterosexual co-ethnics’ norms, practices, and behaviors to evince their conformity and respectability.

Being queer isn't an insult! Many people of the LGBTQ ( lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) community feel attacked by people who are homophobic towards them. People should be informed about the LGBTQ community, and how they are not bad people for being queer. Mainly because there is a big stigma associated with being part of the LGBTQ community.

What is equality? Is it just a political nomenclature or an ideological concept? Or is about working towards creating a fairer society in which each individual can enjoy his/her rights and freedom without any judgement considering that “[w]e will never have true civilization until we have learned to recognize the rights of others.” Will Rogers (1924, p210).

The world change day by day and we as a men, we keep improving and enhance our knowledge. We will use different way of view to judge whether it is positive, negative, ethical or unethical. In this society, we have a LGBT community which stand for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender. The unique of this community is they like person who are same sex with them, in other word is homosexual. In the past, the acceptance toward same sex love or gay marriage is very low but now the acceptance of the society toward this them is increase. Everyone has their right to love someone they loved, the love they give to their partner is same as how we love the one we loved. They having a ‘gay’ gene and environment and social factors influence, (Sarah K., 2014). We should respect on the decision that they made for their current life and also their future. We have no right on judging or controlling their life when they are being themselves. In these few years, most of the people accept them especially for the Generation Y. Their acceptance is higher than the Generation Y that is why Generation Y will comfort “with the whole gay thing”, (Jonathan D.L., 2013)