The Banking Concept Of Education

According to the "The Banking Concept of Education" by Paulo Freire, I believe that Freire does a good job of showing the reader his idea about education. He makes the reader think about him/herself by the way he shows the fact obvious in their life. He hopes the reader know the depth of difference between the banking system and the problem-posing system. Therefore, this essay is talking about learning can only be achieved by communication with others and this can't be achieved through the banking concept. He describes, “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor” (Friera, 257). He thinks that the banking concept as narration because the teacher report to lead the students memorize and

After reading Paulo Freire text on “the ‘banking’ concept of education”, it made me recall my situation in primary and secondary school as a child where we will all sit in class and “listen meekly” (Freire, 216;216) and we were filled with fear whenever we were around those who taught us (respect). This made me to see why Freire was so bold about this “concept” (Freire, 216). He sees this concept as the necessary evil this is because it causes division in the society between the teacher and the student. This is so because the teachers opinion of the student is that the student knows nothing. In this essay I will be addressing both sides of the argument if the “banking” concept is has value as a concept and whether it should be used

In Paulo Freire’s “Banking Concept of Education”, he explains his view of the educational system, and the faults within it. Freire describes the educational system as being “banking education”, which he explains to be the wrong method, and proposes a new method of “problem-posing” education which he believes to be more effective and just.

Freire and Rodriguez would not agree that the process of education has to be certain way. Freire believes that banking education oppresses the students and to be free of oppression we, “must abandon the educational goal of deposit-making and replace it with” problem-posing education (323). On the other hand, Rodriguez’s father saw that education, even banking, “could enable a person to escape from a life of mere labor” (Rodriguez 522). Rodriguez embraced the deposits of information from his teachers. “Any book they told me to read, I read – then waited for them to tell me which books I enjoyed” (Rodriguez 518-19). Rodriguez was so into the banking concept of education that not only did he let the teachers deposit information in him, but also feelings. This type of learning may have made it take longer for Rodriguez to think critically; however, banking education did give him skills that

Philosopher and educator Paulo Freire once said, “Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world.” In Freire’s work of “the Banking Concept of Concept”, he describes how the education system is failing to help student find success in the real world as well as it provides a framework for the “teachers” to oppress the “students” through the distribution of power.

In Paulo Freire’s essay “The Banking Concept of Education,” he discusses the flaws he has seen in the education system. Specifically he argues that in most education systems the students are just empty receptacles being filled by their teachers, there is no dialog between the teacher and students. Freire thinks that in education learning should not be a one way thing, there should be a dialog going on between the teacher and students. Another big point Freire emphasizes in his essay is active learning, so that everyone is learning and participating. In Freire’s essay he proposes a new way of learning/a new concept of learning called the “problem posing concept.” Another point Freire makes in his problem-posing concept is that education is

In the excerpt from “The Banking Concept of Education” the author, Paulo Freire explains the critical flaw in the current education system. He continues by offering his believed solution to this problem. The two concepts Freire discusses in this excerpt are the “banking concept” of education and the “problem-posing method” of education. The “banking concept” is talked about rather negatively, whereas the “problem-posing method” is talked about highly. Freire believes in the “problem-posing method” and that students should have free-will to a certain extent in the classroom with less authoritative power from the teacher during discussions.

Based on Freire’s essay, “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education”, there are two types of education styles. We will use these educational styles to look at how they affected

Paulo Freire wrote “The Banking Concept of Education”. His article is based on the “banking” concept education and problem posing education. Banking education is the learning method between students and teacher where most of the participation in class is done by the teacher. Learners don’t have any idea what the educator is talking about, this is the reason why Freire opposes banking education. Problem posing education is a learning method where students are taught practically about the subject with real examples. The writer supports problem posing method of education where students can benefit in terms of enhancing their critical thinking skills, remembering the concepts for long term. This education

In the essay, “The Banking Concept of Education”, Paulo Freire compares two teaching concepts used in education, which are the “banking concept” and “problem-posing”. In the “banking concept”, the educator assumes that the students are passive, so they take full control and instill students with information without explaining it to them or receive their input. Freire believes that problem-posing education allows people to develop their human natures fully because it depends on interactions between the student and educator, encouraging them to study and learn from one another. He criticizes the banking method throughout the essay, praising only the

How does one know whether a certain education system is consisted with being reputable and knowledgeable? However, many people have different outlooks on a banking, education system being a failure it all depends on the perspective, engagement, and involvement students put into their learning. A banking, education system can be very influential in all classes that can effectively present students the information to obtain not just to memorize, but also to instead make connections with real world situations like how people interact with one another impacts the way we manage to see each other through communication. What makes a banking system successful is determined on how willing the students will be engaged and adapt in the class, how well

On the other hand, he criticized the traditional education manner of simply depositing knowledge, or what he called the “banking concept of education”. He blames the educational process for this and says that it doesn’t depend on the content of the education provided, nor the teacher who lectures. To him if the people do not fight for their rights, their interest, social and cultural freedom then it seems like they have lost the love for life. This also shows the importance of free will, which promotes for a better life. The education given today at school is accountable for the aimless people who don’t have any special purpose of life. Banking concept of education is completely different from Freire concept of problem posing education.. The

According to Paulo Freire in “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education,” the “narrative” nature of the teacher-student correspondence is toxic and counterproductive in any form (Freire 259). To capture this idea, Freire makes education synonymous with a teacher making deposits into the mind of a student, but “the scope of action allowed to the students extends only as far as receiving, filing, and storing the deposits” (Freire 260). Therefore, interpretation and creativity are commodities that do not reach the surface of a student’s work or thoughts. The outlook of having no dialogue between a teacher and student, only opinionated information transference, eliminates the possibility for innovation. All in all, the teacher-student relationship is a critical focal point in terms of whether or not a classroom is successful.

Paulo Freire's, "The 'Banking' Concept of Education" discusses the concept of contemporary education, Freire equates this view to banking; coining the term “banking concept”. In this chapter Freire critiques and analyzes the educational system and likens it to a banking processes, where information is currency, the students are the empty accounts, and the teachers are the depositors. This concept explains that educations is an endowment granted to students. He justifies that this process of education deems humans as individuals who are controllable and even goes as far as saying that banking education diminishes imaginative control. Mr. Freire suggest that this way should be replaced with his method that is much more adequate and practical—his

What do students obtain through education? Freire in his essay ‘The Banking Concept of Education’ argues that students gain useless and meaningless knowledge through education, and I agree with Freire because education has become an act of depositing meaningless information into students. Freire believes the current educational system is flawed due to the “Banking Concept”, which Freire describes as, “an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor”(Freire 72). Freire implies that teachers are only telling students what to know rather than conversting with them, which explains why Freire insists that “education is suffering from narration