The Bass And Sheila Mant Analysis

In stories there is a lot of examples of characterization. I am going to give you some examples from the some of the stories that we read. The first example is when Lady Guinevere touched Sir Lancelot and chills went up his back and he

Throughout the short story “Sheila Mant,” the boy must decide between the bass and Sheila. First off, the boy might pick the bass. One reason why he might pick the bass is because it is the biggest bass he has ever hooked. As it says in the text, “One, that it was a bass. Two, it was a big bass. Three, that it was the biggest bass I had ever hooked” (Wetherell 3). The boy had never hooked a bass this big in his life and is afraid it is his only chance. If the boy picks the bass, then he could have a trophy of a lifetime. The second reason the boy might pick the bass is that he has a history with fishing. As the story states, “Yeah, bass. They come into the shallows at night to chase frogs and moths and things. Big largemouths. Micropterus salmoides, I added, showing off”

Ultimately the narrator chose Shelia over the bass. He made his choice by listening to his heart and cutting the line to the fishing rod, which was hard to do because of how much he loves to fish. He also choose to do it because he really cared about Shelia enough to make his choice and it was also the way she looked in the moonlight and that also got him on board with what he will choose to do. He regrets his decision after the night was over because Shelia told him that she is getting a ride from someone else named Eric Caswell and he was crushed. Then, he thought about the bass and how that was the biggest bass he has ever gotten on his fishing line and he just cut it loose for someone that didn’t even let him bring her back and that thought haunted him for the rest of the summer. I have also regretted something in my life. It, was last year and I saw one of my great friends from primary school and he was with his other friends that he made at Rocori and I had a Volleyball tournament there and in my head I asked myself should I talk to him or should I act like I didn’t see him. That is when he walks right by me in the hall that we were going to, to play volleyball and him and his friend where both smiling at me when they walked by. And I really wanted to talk to him, but at the same time I was questioning myself a lot so I couldn’t get myself to say anything to him. So I chose not

The realization comes later after he has accidentally hooked the biggest fish he has ever hooked. By reeling in the bass, he would be losing Sheila, but cutting it loose would make him lose the catch of his life. When the narrator finally knows a decision must be made between the bass and Sheila, he chooses Sheila believing it is a more mature thing to do. When he “pull[s] a penknife . . . and cut[s] the line,” (7) he makes a conscious decision that Sheila Mant is to be more important than his fishing. When the night is over, and Sheila goes off in a different guy’s Corvette, the narrator comes to the realization that she was not worth giving up the fish. Later in life, after being with other girls and catching other fish, what “haunts [him] still” is losing the bass, not Sheila Mant. Ultimately, the narrator’s maturity came from finding out what he actually loved the most and sticking to that.

There are many people that are mean, selfish, and kill for money. In “The Bass, the River, and Sheila Mant”, Sheila Mant is one of the mean and selfish people. In this story, Sheila exhibits laziness, not caring about anybody but herself, and using people. All of these characteristics are exhibited through indirect characterization. That shows, better than direct characterization, what type of person Sheila Mant is.

Another very well used literary device in this story is personification. Personification is when an inanimate object is given human attributes. In the specific instance

Equally important in the story is the use of characterization to show the reader exactly who the protagonist in the story is and what kind of life she is living, we first read of her sisters and how they act in contrast to the protagonist: “I [the narrator] wasn't even pretty or nice like my older sisters and I just couldn't do the girl things they could

Everybody knows that feeling when you like a girl or a boy. You get nervous around them, can not think clearly around them. Both pieces of writing speak to this feeling. In the short story The Bass, The River, and Sheila Mant the narrator states “ the only creature that seemed lovelier to me then a largemouth bass was sheila mant” (Wetherell 245). That statement shows us that she means alot to him because fishing was everything to him and he put her above it. The poem It’s Raining in Love, talks about these feeling as well. Richard Brautigan express this feeling when he says “ I don’t know what it is, but I distrust myself when I start to like a girl a lot” ( Brautigan 251). The short story and the poem have a very similar theme, they both

In fact, he says, “She is prettier than a largemouth bass”. While this may seem like an odd compliment cleary he finds her more attractive than his favorite past time. In the end, the narrator asks Sheila Mant on a date. The narrator is very young, and he would probably not ask out Sheila had she not been attractive. The second reason the narrator should pick the girl is because he stares at her for too much time. He makes an effort to be outside when she is outside and to show off by swimming laps. This is a proven effort of showing off because as previously stated he is very superficial and this physical feat of swimming is an attempt to seem more attractive. He is very obsessed with her to the extreme of knowing all her various emotions. He know her emotions from the way she idles on her dock. This is not the only instance of stalking in the narrator routine, he also partakes in viewing from the bushes. This proves how much he is obsessed with her because bushes are not very comfortable and it is most probably a last resort solution to view her without be seen. Although there are a plethora of reasons to choose Sheila Mant, there is a myriad of reasons to pick the fish instead. The first of which is the massive

Characterization is an important component in short story writing. In the short story "Lamb to the Slaughter" written by Roald Dahl, we are introduced to Mary Maloney, a pregnant housewife who recently found out that her husband is going to leave her. Mary develops into a very complex character as the events of the short story unfold. Mary is a typical housewife, waiting on her husband hand and foot. She loves him dearly, but as the short story unfolds, we see that he does not share the same feelings. Mary, unable to handle the rejection, lashes out and kills her husband. We then see Mary’s character transform before our eyes and the once loving, dutiful housewife becomes a very devious, manipulative and cold hearted character. She manages

This shows not only that he thought his canoe was the coolest thing on the entire freaking planet, but he also thought that everyone else did too. Realistic for little kids, sure, but not a teenager. As for Sheila Mant, well, nearly everything about her was unrealistic. She was so ridiculously attractive that every boy in the entire town was “in love” with her? Suuure. it’s easy to believe that her main concerns in life are parties, herself, and boys, and it’s hard to blame her for ditching some creepy stalker kid who brought her to a party by canoe, but these seem to be the only aspects of her personality, or at least the only ones that matter enough to put in the story. What’s with this young girl being the villain of the story just for being kind of harsh about fishing being dumb and for making the entirely reasonable decision to go out with the guy who had a cool car and who was her age over, again, creepy stalker kid? Okay, she was the villain in the main character’s eyes, but she really wasn’t a villain, and yet it seemed to be the only thing about her that mattered to the story. In reality, he was the villain. And a literal stalker. And speaking of the story, specifically the plot, that’s unrealistic

Authors use characterization to develop the actions of the characters. Like Mary’s actions in ‘The Lamb to the Slaughter’ by using different kinds of literature devices. Roald Dahl in "The Lamb to the Slaughter" uses characterization, imagery, and irony to develop the character of Mary so that the reader can understand what has occurred during the murder.

Hemingway was explaining that Nick was using this to help himself cope with things in life as an example of what Nick’s wants in life or self-realization. Hemingway writes later in the story when Nick sees the big trout in the river and decides not to go after it. Perhaps Nick sees it as the swamp is the misery in his life and the trout is the feeling way down deep that he does not want to obtain until he is ready. It seems that memories are the only hindrance that would keep him from getting closer to being fulfilled.

Characterization is a literary element used by the author to present qualities of characters in a literary piece, the purpose of characterization is to make characters credible and make them suitable for the role they play in the work. Authors present various characters possessing dissimilar qualities, to emphasize different aspects of the work. In the novel “The Scarlet Letter”, the author Nathaneil Hawthorn’s depiction of the two male characters, Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth, emphasizes the moral problems of the seventeenth century puritan society. Hence, their different characters contribute vitally to the plot of the novel.

The literary element of characterization is used to show and describe many of the characters in the novel to show many of the positive and negative changes within the character. With Marlow, he was a British seaman