The Battle Of The Civil War

The American Civil War has become a point of controversy and argument when discussing key events in shaping America. The arguments that arise when discussing the war tend to focus on whether the Confederate was constitutionally justified in seceding, or whether the North had the right to prevent the secession. However, when discussing the America Civil War and the idea of separation, it is important to be mindful that separation did not simply end at the state level. Letters written by Jesse Rolston, Jr. and Jedediah Hotchkiss portray two significantly different attitudes toward the war, despite the fact that the writers both fought for the Confederate States and give accounts of the same battle, one of which ended in the Confederate’s favor. When examining the documents, both writers express different viewpoints on life on and off the battlefield. This significant difference represents a division amongst the Confederate army.

In the American viewpoint, Texas is seen as the state that enhances their western characteristics alongside with their historic past of events placed in significant monuments. This was to preserve their identity which had long gone through vast disputes in the past regarding to the creation of the state. “Texans were even more determined than most states to recover their past. No other region of the country had experienced such a convoluted history.” (A Line in the Sand: The Alamo in Blood and Memory, 205) Texas had gained their independence from Mexico in 1836 and have remained a separate nation for about nearly a decade. The Republic of Texas was then granted their official recognition as a state in 1845 through the annexation of the United States of America.

Throughout the Civil War period, Texas existed as a state in the Confederate States of America, its status confirmed by the elected representatives of the Texas citizens. (Sam Houston, although accepting the decision of the electorate to secede, protested the Convention's decision to join the Confederacy since the matter was not submitted to popular vote. His opposition was insufficient to cause either the voters or the members of the state legislature to put aside the actions of the Convention.) John H. Reagan, a Texan, was the Postmaster General of the C.S.A., and other Texans held prominent government posts throughout

The U.S. state of Texas declared its secession from the United States of America on February 1, 1861, and joined the Confederate states on March 2, 1861, after it replaced its governor, Sam Houston, when he refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy. As with those of other States, the Declaration was not recognized by the United States government at Washington. Some Texan military units fought in the Civil War east of the Mississippi River but Texas was most useful for supplying soldiers and horses for Confederate forces. Texas' supply role lasted until mid-1863, after which time Union gunboats controlled the Mississippi River, making large transfers of men, horses or cattle impossible. Some cotton was sold in Mexico, but most

In Nicholas Lemann’s story Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War, it shows a theme of leadership through the main character of the story, and Adelbert Ames effectively demonstrates the required traits of a main character and a leader. The book focused on a lot of events that happened in the Reconstruction era. It tells about both the political characteristics and the social characteristics that are unraveled throughout the reformation of the South and giving the African Americans the right to vote along with other political freedoms. Throughout the story, Adelbert Ames successfully demonstrates the qualities of a great protagonist and a leader. Adelbert Ames shows the theme of leadership and how his change in his ambition and morality would make him a better leader in his life.

The most important reason why the Texas fought in the civil war was to preserve slavery. Texas believed that white men “established the government” and African Americans did not (document B). Texans wanted power, and maintaining slavery would not only bring power but and economic uprising. Since “182,566” people were enslaved in 1860, this being “30%” of the Texas’ population (document A), many Texans used slavery for farming and cultivating crops. Slavery was key in sustaining the Economy. It’s simply like a math equation, slavery plus crops equals economy, take slavery away and the entire empire

The Texan army continued to fight for its independence after the battle of the Alamo. When the won their independence from Mexico, the republic of Texas was then created. The U.S. was hesitant to annex Texas, because it was currently a slave state and they did not want another.

Texans fought for Texas also because Abraham Lincoln didn’t approve of state’s rights (Document C) . Texas wanted state’s rights so they could seceded even though Sam Houston (first governor of Texas) disagreed. Since they though it wasn’t fair, Texans could be fighting because of state’s rights. O.M. Roberts, president of Texas Secession Convention, says that the U.S. government is a blended mass of people in one social compact (Document C). This tells us that Roberts didn’t like the U.S. government and wanted Texas to secede from

Slavery in Texas grew fast in 1860’s, but things were about to change. After a slave revolt led by John Brown, South Carolina had enough of the North and left the U.S. Later more states joined South Carolina, and they decided to form The Confederate States of America. Texas had just joined the U.S, so why would they want to fight just to go to another country? Well, Texans went to war because of states rights, their love of Texas, and to preserve slavery.

First, texans fought in civil war was because of states rights. “The crisis upon us involves not only the right of self government, but the maintenance of a great principle in the law of nations . . . the true theory of our (national) government as an association of sovereignties, and not a blended mass of people in one social compact (Doc C).” This is the speech of O.M. Roberts on states rights. He was the head of the Texas Secession Convention, January 28,

One reason why the Texans participated in the Civil War was to defend states` rights. They believed they had the right to make decisions on items not covered by the constitution. Therefore, Texas secession was a states rights and was worth fighting for. Texas had previously fought for its right to self-government. Stated in document C “Texas secession convention said states were sovereign and had the right to secede.”

Everybody knows about the Civil War, the bloodiest war in American history between the Union and the Confederacy. Not many people were informed about the reason Texas fought in this devastating war. In the year 1860 Abraham Lincoln was elected as president. This was when the south had had enough. The next year in 1861 Sam Houston thought to south had absolutely no chance of winning the war so he believed the Union was a better option. The people of Texas were against this and voted to secede the Union and they were the 7th state to do so. Sam Houston did not take the oath to join the Confederacy and was forced to resign, feeling like he failed his people.

There were not many battles fought in Texas, but Texans did a lot for the south. Texans fought in the Civil War for State’s Rights, love of Texas, and slavery. The first reason Texas fought in the Civil War was to protect State’s Rights. The South was mad because they said that the State’s Rights allowed them to have their slaves. This was important because the North wanted to take them away.

Texas(The Lone Star State)became part of the United States in 1845. It was the twenty-eighth state in the U.S. Texas gained its independence from Mexico at San Jacinto Creek, but it had a hard time getting there. First there was the battle of Gonzales, October 2, 1835. The Mexican army had orders to go retrieve a cannon there. They were met by a bunch of Texan rebels and a tense stand of. A handful of Texans opened fire on the Mexicans, who swiftly withdrew. It was a mere skirmish and only one soldier was killed. Nevertheless it was the start to the War for Texas Independence. Next was the Battle of Goliad, October 10, 1835. The Battle of Goliad was the second skirmish of the Texas Revolution. In the early-morning hours of October 9, 1835,

Many people who now the story and that do not know the story of how Texas became a state think that United States took Texas from Mexico but that is not correct because Texas obtain their independence from the Texas revolution. All begin when Santa Anna one of the presidents from Mexico established a military dictatorship in 1935 and increased the number of soldiers in Texas as well as confiscated several privately owned guns and suppressed efforts of the Texans to form militias (Byes 5). After this change that Santa Anna made the residents from Texas would feel like their liberty was taken and they would want to obtain their privileges back or to obtain better ones than the ones that they already had. Texas residents not feeling comfortable wanted to negotiate with the president to obtain the privileges they had or obtain better ones but nothing was obtain. Since, the president would not help with the negotiation the residents wanted to obtain their independence. Until 1836 Texas declare their independence but was taken place until April 21, 1836 because they declared themselves independent but Santa Anna wanted to obtain Texas but his army got defeated by Houston at the Battle of San Jacinto (Byes 6). Texas was considered independent but they not secured because they knew that Mexico would want revenge and would do whatever is possible to obtain Texas back. James Knot Polk used the Texas Annexation as a campaign and help him won but it was until