The Battle Over Same-Sex Marriage Essay

Better Essays
Same-sex marriage has grown into to a national issue. In 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples had the right to marry which provoked a firestorm of debate. The discussion extends from private livings rooms and local watering holes; all the way to the floor of the U.S. Congress and the White House. The debate about same-sex marriage has become a hot button issue, which pits secular-progressives who support gay-rights against religious and social traditionalists fighting for the sanctity of marriage.

When La Shawn Barber, Anna Quindlen, Andrew Sullivan and the editors at National Review wrote their opinion pieces regarding the topic of same-sex marriage the debate had already been raging for many
…show more content…
Barber insists that although Loving v. Virginia dealt with the inequality of civil rights in marriages, it was still ultimately a fight for the right for one man to marry one woman. Therefore, in her opinion, the case is not applicable to the fight for same-sex marriage. Barber asserts that the goal of miscegenation laws “was to maintain a subordinate class of citizens based on race” (par. 8), and that current bans against same-sex marriage are intended to preserve traditional marriage, not to show prejudice against homosexuals.

Quindlen and many other same-sex marriage champions believe that the right to marry is an inherent civil right; which therefore should be granted to homosexuals under the law. Quindlen believes the desire to marry—even amongst homosexuals—is a “powerful [force] for good on earth” (par 12). She refers to a statement made by Mildred Loving, the woman from the pivotal Loving v. Virginia court case, in which Mildred maintains that all American’s “no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation should have the same freedom to marry” (par 14). In contrast, Barber feels that homosexuality is not an inborn trait; therefore, civil rights laws created to legalize interracial marriages are not applicable to same-sex marriage. Like Barber, many from the opposition camp feel that marriage is not an innate civil right. According to the Los Angeles Times, in early
Get Access