The Battle of Hastings - Why Did William Win? Essay

In Henry V, Shakespeare clearly shows that powerful speech and eloquent rhetoric is more effective in times of war than threat of sharp swords and numerous soldiers. King Henry V - the young and bright king of England - establishes himself as a devout leader to his country and his people. Throughout the story he demonstrates his ability to articulate in order to manipulate his audience, whether it be commoners, enemies, or friends. After an argument with the Dauphin of France over land claims, Henry gathers an army to invade French territory. Following a surprising march through the country against all odds, the king and his soldiers find themselves in a five to one battle, destined to fall defeated. The character of King Henry is exemplified

This paper will examine the British and American Southern Loyalist defeat in the Battle of Kings Mountain and discuss the assumptions the British made including loyalist support, logistic support, and terrain advantage.

they were organized and knew what to do when the time came to set sail

Henry Tudor left France on August 1 with 2,000 men and gathered more men as he travelled through Wales; by the time of battle on the 22nd of August he had a 5,000 strong army (Hickman, 2009). Richard III had an army of 10,000 men. Henry had sent messengers to Lord Stanley and Sir William Stanley requesting assistance, they both agreed to desert Richard III during the battle. When both Stanleys swapped sides, this turned the numbers in favour of Henry's army. The battle only lasted approximately 2 hours ending with Richard’s death and Henry Tudor, despite being 13th in line for the crown at the time, was crowned King Henry VII.

William had a hard time taking control. People constantly rebelled during his rule, and he would have to learn

When Edward came into power in 1042, England was in a poor state financially and also because of threats of an invasion and this made the first few years of his rule difficult. Edward was faced with many problems which he had to overcome. These problems involved; powerful Earls, (especially the Godwine’s), the foreign policy and the domestic policy. Edward both failed and succeeded in these problems due to a number of factors. These include a lack of knowledge about his kingdom and some may argue that he was naïve in his decisions. With some evaluation, we will be able to judge if Edward was a successful King or not.

William was already good and experienced at ruling so thus should be no problem for him. William was already the ruler of Normandy and was doing a great job so being ruler of England wouldn’t be a

One reason why William won the Battle of Hastings was because of his preparation and readiness for the battle. His army were provided with cavalry that were trained to kick, bite and head-butt. This is shown in the Bayeux Tapestry and source 3 where there are soldiers seen fighting on horses. I know that William’s half-brother organised the creation of the tapestry so the information on it is likely to be accurate. This meant William won the Battle of Hastings because he had an extra weapon that the English didn’t have therefore could surprise them, attack and leave more damage.

The Battle of Agincourt is known as one of the greatest because of the circumstances surrounding it. Arguably, it is among the most distinguished battle wins of the English because nobody expected them to defeat the French. The reason was that the French army had four times more troops than it did, and everyone expected it to lose because of this. However, there are a number of factors that were at play that surpassed the numbers the French had and necessitated the English win. Such factors had to do with the strategies that were employed by the English, the conditions at the battlefield, and, most importantly, the leadership in place.

The Battle of Hastings took place in October of the year 1066. It was fought between the Normans (French) and the Anglo-Saxons (English). The English were led by Harold II, while the French were led by William of Normandy. William of Normandy made some key decisions in the battle that allowed his army to defeat the English. William of Normandy followed Sun Tzu's Art of War and because of the he went on to win the battle. William of Normandy won the battle by following Sun Tzu's teachings of Weak points & Strong, Strategy and tactics, and leading by example.

Both William II and Henry I were strong soldiers like their father and fought in their wars alongside their soldiers. [1][2] Different historians believe each to be the better solider. Most Historians believe Henry I to be the stronger swordsmen, but we must remember that most of the sources found are written with a very biased view, leaning towards Henry I as he was a religious man, unlike William II. The fact of who is the better swordsman is one that can never truly be discovered.

The Battle of Hastings took place on October 14th 1066.It was between Harold Godwinson and William the Duke of Normandy. Edward the confessor (King or England) died of old age.Before he died he promised 3 mens to claim the throne of England.These mens were Horold Godwindon,Willam of Normandy and Harald Hadrada.Each of these mens thought they were the best to claim the throne of England but in oder to find out There was Battles (stamford bridge) .After the battle of Stamford Bridge, Harold Godwinson heard some bad news. This was that William had invaded.At the end William of Normandy was sucessful but why?

The Battle of Hastings was fought in 1066, and its outcome greatly impacted England. After Edward the Confessor, the king of England, died, three men argued over who should inherit the throne. Harold Godwinson assumed the throne, while Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, and Duke

William Wallace’s most epic battle was the Battle at Sterling Bridge. It was September 1297. The English army arrived at Sterling with a large military presence of cavalry and infantry. They were led by Hugh de Cressingham and John de Warenne, who was the Earl of Surrey and Governor in Scotland for Edward I. John de Warenne was convinced that this show of force, combined with previous other battles they had recently victoriously won, that the Scottish would surrender.

The conflict was in the end resolved at the battle of Hastings in 1066. As Harald Goodwinson’s army first faced Harald Hardrada’s Viking attack in September of 1066 in the battle of Stamford Bridge. Harald Goodwinson’s army managed to defeat the Vikings in an exhausting battle, however, only three days later William’s army reached Hastings and Goodwinson and his army had to rush to the sight to face their new foe. Goodwinson’s army was indeed reduced and tired after the trials at Stamford Bridge, nevertheless, what followed was the longest battle in the history of medieval Britain (Kramer.33), and the result was a new king of England, the Duke of Normandy, King William the Conqueror.