The Behavior Of Firms Under Oligopoly Market

An oligopolistic market is one that has several dominant firms with the power to influence the market they are in; an example of this could be the supermarket industry which is dominated by several firms such as Tesco, Sainsbury’s, and Waitrose etc... Furthermore an oligopolistic market can be defined in terms of its structure and its conduct, which involve various different aspects of economics.

An oligopoly is “a market situation in which relatively few sellers [like Burger King, McDonald’s] compete and high start-up costs form barriers to keep out new competitors [like Five Guys Burgers and Fries]” (Boone and Kurtz, 2012, p. 80). Within this competitive fast food burger industry, the main product being offered is a hamburger.

Oligopolies are a type of market structure evident in Australia, which is comprised of 2 or more firms having a significant share of the market. In an oligopoly the few firms sell similar but differentiated or homogenous products and is characterised by a large number of buyers making it a form of imperfect competition. This market structure is evident through the Big Four Banks, Phone Industry - Vodafone, Optus and Telstra.

2. (Price Leadership) why might a price–leadership model of oligopoly not be an effective means of collusion in an oligopoly?

In this article Michael Baker discusses the livelihood of small retailers in a market subjugated by the financially dominant oligopolies, Woolworths and Coles. While the small independent retailers in direct competition with Woolworths and Coles provide some competitive respite for consumers, as they encourage competitive pricing, albeit predatory pricing, it is clear that Woolworths and Coles control the supermarket industry in Australia, in the formation of a duopoly. It is evident that Woolworths and Coles engage in predatory pricing in an attempt to eliminate independent retailers from the market. This article discusses recent efforts made by the Australian government and the Australian Competition

There are many models of market structure in the field of economics. They include perfect competition on one end, monopoly on the other end, and competitive monopoly and oligopoly somewhere in the middle. In this paper, we will focus on the oligopoly structure because it is one of the strongest influences in the United States market. Although oligopolies can also be global, we will focus strictly on the United States here. We will define oligopoly, give key characteristics important to the oligopoly structure, explain why oligopolies form, then give an example of an oligopoly in today’s economy. Finally, we will discuss the benefits and costs in this type of market structure.

Monopolistic competition and Oligopoly are considered imperfectly competitive markets that are a result of few to many firms offering differentiated products. Differentiation of products impede substitution, which allow producers to earn higher than normal profits and thereby enhance shareholder wealth (Byrd, J., Hickman, K., & McPherson, M., 2013). Oligopolies are highly interdependent, with actions of one firm will resulting in a reaction from another. The interdependence results in higher efficiency as a necessity to compete with rivals. According to Claessens "greater development, lower costs, enhanced efficiency and a greater and wider supply resulting from competition will lead to greater [financial] access (2009).

Due to uncertainty, firms may want to ensure a stable amount of profit, collusion may be an option for them.

As illustrated by Sloman and Hinde (2007), an Oligopoly by nature has price stability, even when there has been no collusion between firms. This theory is based on two assumptions. For example, if Tate and Lyle were to lower their prices, British Sugar and the other rivals would feel the need to follow suit to prevent losing customers to Tate and Lyle. Contrastingly, if British Sugar raised their prices, Tate and Lyle would not follow suit. They would keep their prices the same and gain customers from British Sugar. The kinked demand model illustrates this.

This select gathering of firms has control over the value and, similar to a syndication, an oligopoly has high hindrances to passage. The items that the oligopolistic firms produce are regularly almost indistinguishable and, in this way, the organizations, which are vieing for piece of the overall industry, are related as an aftereffect of business powers. Expect, for instance, that an economy needs just 100 gadgets. Organization X delivers 50 gadgets and its rival, Organization Y, creates the other 50. The costs of the two brands will be related and, in this way, comparative. Along these lines, if Organization X begins offering the gadgets at a lower value, it will get a more prominent piece of the pie, in this manner compelling Organization Y to bring down its costs

When companies are making decisions, the companies do not worry about how the rivals will react, in part to each company’s actions are unlikely to affect its rivals to a great extent hence they are independent. In addition, there is perfect knowledge in the market hence new companies have the freedom to enter into the industry. The companies are also profit maximizers, producing output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost; the profit maximising condition. Companies in a

•Monopolistic competition- When an industry contains many rival firms, each of which has a comparable but at least slightly different product. Restaurants, are an example, all serve food but of different types of food and in different sites. Manufacture costs are above what could be attained if firms sold equal products, but consumers have an advantage from the variety.

“An observation made of oligopolistic business behaviour in which one company, usually the dominant competitor among

In micro-economics market failure is characterized by resource misallocation and subsequent Pareto inefficiency. Just as the invisible hand falters, so is the case that the unregulated markets are incapable of solving all economic problems. In laissez-faire economy, market models mainly monopolistic, perfect competition and oligopoly are expected to efficiently allocate resources for the “welfare benefit” of the society. However individualistic and selfish private interests divert the public benefits thereby prompting government intervention to correct the imperfection which may lead to disastrous economic impact. Although corrective intervention policies by government may not necessarily address the underlying imperfection induced by

Barriers to entry and exit are also likely to exist. In oligopoly markets there is product differentiation, the extent of which depends on the type of product produced. This leads to interdependency, as the actions of one large firm will directly affect another large firm. Therefore, firms are said to be operating under conditions of