The Benefits Of Human Cloning

There are some scientist and the public that concluded that human cloning would aid in the progress of genetic knowledge and human advancement. In John Harris article, Is gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics?, he brings forth the issue of disabilities. He advocates that if we have the genetic means to create people free of disabilities, then gene therapy eugenics should be allowed. This would be a form of reproductive cloning. John Harris wrote, “It is not that the genetically weak should be discouraged from reproducing but that everyone should be discouraged from reproducing children who will be significantly harmed by their genetic constitution.” 3 This would insure people with genetic defects to have health children. Even in Dan Brock’s essay he points out the positive positions on the benefits of cloning for genetic reasons. He admits that even though cloning is not the natural way for reproduction, it could lead to some good things genetically. Cloning technology could also teach doctors how to renew damaged cells by growing new cells and replacing them. The study of cell differentiation could be enhanced by studying the development of a clone. Cloning could be used to produce extra human organs or prevent hereditary diseases. This process even could be capable of reproducing someone who died to help alleviate the pain of loss. In a bigger aspect, some of our most talented people or genius could be recreated like Mozart or Einstein. However, as Brock brings his essay

For starters, cloning has said to solve the continuous problem of infertility by inserting a clone embryo into the woman’s body. This guarantees infertile couples a child, as opposed to wasting time and money on other painful and emotional procedures that don’t offer this guarantee. The next benefit offers an immense amount of growth in regenerative medicine and assists those with physical disabilities by producing clones of themselves. Why clone themselves if they have a disability? Scientists can use cells from the embryo to customize the regeneration of the new organ, tissue, or body part. As far as cloning an organ goes, this benefits the millions of people who acquired a disease with no cure. For example, diseases such as Alzheimer’s,

Human cloning is described as “the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human.” Although human cloning has no record of being successful, cloning was demonstrated to be possible when scientists Sir Ian Wilmut and the rest of their research team successfully cloned Dolly, a sheep (Wilmut 12). This demonstration opened up a new area of science ready to be explored. If animals can be cloned, can human beings be cloned too? If successful, scientists would be able to clone human copies and further advance modern medicine, such as using cells for regenerative medicine or harvesting organs for transplants. It is also possible that other fields of medicine and research can be furthered with this supply of human clones. Additionally, couples incapable of reproducing can pursue cloning to create an offspring with their DNA. However, human cloning has never been successful and comes with ethical concerns.The clone can suffer from abnormalities. There are also concerns regarding the treatment of embryos to gather stem cells and the treatment of clones as a person. By further investigating and analyzing this topic through the lens of Catholic moral tradition, I hope to make clear the pros and cons of the subject while also evaluating them with an ethical theory learned from this quarter in order to add to the discussion.

The idea of finding a way to cure people of diseases with their own cells is one that scientists, physicians, and those who are afflicted by such diseases find very enticing. Therapeutic cloning is a process that scientists believe has the potential to achieve such goals in the future. While therapeutic cloning brings with it a variety of potential benefits and innovations, it also carries with it a polarizing ethical conflict that poses a strong impediment to furthering such research and development. By realizing therapeutic cloning for its great potential benefits and world changing implications and disregarding any ethical considerations that may deter such advancement, the proper focus and open-mindedness necessary to achieve success in the field would be achieved. Therapeutic cloning, like all medical endeavors, includes a multitude of challenges and flaws, but no very important medical achievements come about without extensive research and continual attempts at success.

Instead of cloning entire humans and genetically modifying them to our desires, we can use the technology to cure diseases and even help couples that are unable to reproduce. As the reader of this article, you have the ability in deciding the future of mankind and by learning this information on cloning and genetic engineering you will hopefully make an informed decision on the use and research of cloning and genetically modifying humans in the years to

As years pass, new discoveries are made through extensive research. These discoveries improve the life expectancy of humans, due to the continuous advancements in medical research and equipment. Infact, a main controversial aspect of medicine that has blown minds is said to be cloning. Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of an organism. It is divided into two branches: reproductive and therapeutic. Reproductive cloning creates an animal genetically identical to its donor, where it is then placed back into the uterine environment for further development. Therapeutic cloning on the other hand is quiet similar in the sense of formation. However, the resulting cloned cells remain in a lab and are not to be inserted into a female uterus to be nurtured into a fetus. These cells are instead used to treat and prevent diseases and conditions. Over time scientists have put forth all their knowledge and research into creating their very first fully cloned animal. But, until this day, “observers say that no reputable scientist is actively attempting to produce a human clone through reproductive cloning.” (“The Science of Cloning”,1) This procedure remains to be an issue worldwide due to the harm it carries along to reach its beneficial goal.

Cloning has been one of the most widely discussed and controversial scientific topics in the past decade. Cloning has been applied in many fields including the creation of new breeds of plants and animals. However, the cloning of plants has been practiced for hundreds of years. Cloning can be done on a larger level in animals and has potential benefits. The general process of cloning is to take one cell from the parent making the offspring and parent genetically identical (Tsunoda and Kato, 158-161). In addition by making completely identical cells, we can apply different treatments to different clones to see if they react in different ways. The potential benefits of cloning out way the consequences of cloning. In this paper I will first elaborate on microorganisms. Then I will talk about plants, animal and human cloning, and the controversies in cloning.

“Clones can happen naturally—identical twins are just one of many examples” (Cloning). Cloning has a lot of controversy surrounding it. Some people believe that it shouldn’t be used in science. There are also people out there that believe it is extraordinary and should be used on a daily basis. There are many benefits to cloning, but there are also many things most people don’t know about genetic cloning, such as how it works and that it occasionally happens naturally. I will be writing about how genetic cloning works, the risks involved, and how it can be beneficial.

The likelihood of a scientific and medical breakthrough is undeniable. According to List of Pros and Cons of Human Cloning (2014, December 29), cloning may just revolutionize both the scientific and medical fields. Elimination of defective genes, according to Pros and Cons of Human Cloning - HRFnd (2013, December 6), can be achieved through cloning. Pros and Cons of Human Cloning - HRFnd (2013, December 6) continues to elaborate on this by stating that though these genes may not be a leading killer now that may change in the future, the elimination of fertility treatments is also mentioned (since cloning your own child would be possible), hence why cloning can undoubtedly change the

In measuring the benefits, human reproductive cloning would be advantageous to the well-being of humans and because it is a fulfillment of personal autonomy. Firstly, this technique is a sound method for infertile couples to have a genetically related ‘child’ and it is a method to provide a patient medical treatment in a form of gene therapy or organ transplants (Hayry 2003). Secondly, the value of personal self-governance has been emphasized by human traditions in which the liberty of individuals is seen as important to individuals in our society today. Cloning would promote the well-being of some individuals without violating any person’s autonomy and conclusively is rational that people’s reproductive choice is not a realm to be interfered.

• Defective genes. The average person carries eight defective genes inside of them. These defective genes allow people to become sick when they would otherwise remain healthy. With human cloning and its technology it may be possible to ensure that we no longer suffer because of our defective genes.

The birth of the first cloned mammal, lamb Dolly, shocked the world on 23 February 1997.Soon after the announcement, the media attention was diverted by the possibility of cloning a human. Although the scientists from the Roslin Institute who had made the significant breakthrough with Dolly denied the possibility of creating human clones, the idea was still wide debated about the risks and benefits of human cloning. So, what is cloning? Cloning is a process of generating a new organism by an identical genetic copy of the original donor. The DNA of the two organisms will be identical (Laurențiu, 2012).With the development stage of science, human has been already manufacturing embryonic stem cells, which is beneficial to medical science such as inventing a new therapy for serious diseases. In the future, the human would take advantages of the development of reproductive cloning technology to reproduce the next generation. However, whether human cloning project should be prohibited or not arouses intense debate among the public because it is unethical and the clone technology is not perfect yet. In my opinion, human cloning would benefit the humanity, thus, the research of cloning should be carried out with strict legal protection, and limited to the category of medical research currently.

Reproductive cloning is an issue because it is inherently unsafe. The technique cannot be developed in humans without putting the physical safety of the clones and the women who bear them at risk. At least 95% of mammalian cloning experiments are failures that can result in miscarriages, stillbirths, and life-threatening anomalies; a few experts believe that no clones are of full health. If reproductive cloning is permitted to happen and is accepted, it is difficult to see how we could proscribe any other dangerous applications of genetic engineering technology. It will also drive up the prices of healthcare for those who are in need of transplants, if scientists begin to create “spare parts” to replace damaged or non-functional organs.

Human cloning is the process that refers to the copying and replicating identical copies of humans using genetic engineering methods. Cloning can help and solve problems such as cloning in medicine, or to clone humans. We are going to look at the human cloning and its pros, cons, how is it done and the ethical issues of human cloning.

While many see cloning as an opportunity for scientific and social advancement, those possibilities are outweighed by the many corresponding ethical dilemmas. Our modern world is overwhelmed with technology that theoretically enriches or lives or enhances its quality. Personal computers, smartphones and email come to mind. Other inventions and scientific developments, such as nuclear weapons, make us more uncomfortable due to their capability for mass destruction when placed in the wrong hands. Typically, it is easy to discern and draw that invisible line between science that is mostly beneficial to us and alleged progress that could have an overall damaging impact on the fabric of our society. When scientists in Scotland successfully cloned a mammal in 1996 – a sheep they named Dolly, in honor of American country singer Dolly Parton (Smith) – it triggered an ethical debate that lingers to this day and promises to grow more spirited in these socially permissive times.