The Benefits Of Paying College Athletes Get Paid

Top collegiate athletes should be able to get paid. Schools are making millions in ticket sales, selling jerseys and other venues that help out of school. However, college athletes make all the money for the college. College athletes should deserve to to get paid. “The college sports industry generates $11 Billion in annual revenues.”(Text 1, line 1) the college sports industry generates so much money, that they need to share the money and that it's selfish. Scholarship athletes should be getting paid.

Have you ever wondered how hard is it is as a college athlete, or the struggles as a

Being an athlete is hard enough but when you add the “student” it gets twice as difficult that’s why they need extra money so they don’t need a separate job and have more time for school.

Furthermore, where should the money come from? Is it the responsibility of the school to pay these athletes or the NCAA? Other questions include how much should students-athletes be paid, how often, will it work in a similar way that professional contracts work, etc.? All these questions reveal how difficult it would be to change the college athletic system to compensate college athletes. Regardless of what number of individuals feels that athletes ought not to be paid for their ability, there is pretty much the same number of individuals whom feel they ought to. There are numerous reasons why individuals think a student athlete ought to be adjusted. Some of those reasons incorporate; individuals feel that frequently the college utilizes these athletes as boards for their school. Additionally, the universities are "offering the athletes' names and achievements for the schools own acknowledgment. “Athletic organizations are utilizing college athletes to offer their items, along these lines the athletes ought to see a portion of the money that is earned. It has even been demonstrated that promoting through understudy athletes extraordinarily impacts more youthful

Remy, D. (2012). Why the New York Times ' Nocera is wrong. NCAA News, 5.

In the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia’s definition of “Amateur” it states, during the early 20th century “the American intercollegiate athletic system… adopted amateurism, claiming it developed competitors who were morally superior to professionals” (“Amateur”). Amateurism is the concept that athletes should compete without payment. Until recently, playing collegiate sports as an amateur was thought to be a noble calling. As time surpassed, college sports became a commercialized industry, generating billions of dollars in revenue. When this became apparent, the implementation of athletic scholarships became more relevant. The athletic scholarship seemed to be a more than fair way to delight athletes with some sort of incentive to ensure

College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.

When it comes to college basketball, it is basically the same thing. This sport alone generates large amounts of money because it is a popular sport in the United States. The real money is made in the month of March when the most anticipated college basketball tournament is played. Multiple businesses work with the NCAA to have their commercials shown during nationally televised games, the deals are made between them for large amounts of cash. According to an article from the NPR website “ Our athletic program at the University of Miami is subsidized by the university - millions of dollars, in fact - and I would argue that most of the programs in this country are in the same situation she says”( “Staff”). When all of these factors are put together it is very possible to pay college athletes since it is proven that the NCAA and universities make millions of dollars with ease.

First, some say that college athletes should be paid because of the fact that the schools and the NCAA make billions. In an article from USA Today, it stated: “NCAA made more than $1 billion for the year” (Mama). On the other hand, they should not be paid because tons of the athletes get scholarships, they are rewarded with a free education, and they are technically getting around twenty-thousand dollars a year. First, in an article from Scholorshipstats.com in statistics from 2015 regarding the amount of scholarship money that was given out was nearly 2.2 billion dollars.

Research from “College athletics programs make a lot of money, send little to academics” the University of Texas at Austin brings in a average of 184 million dollars each year through athletics. The question that floats everyone's mind is why are the athletes not getting paid . Some believe paying them will no longer show value of the game. However others believe they should be paid because they dedicate their lives to the sport. The NCAA must recognize the benefits of compensating college athletics because, college athletics work hard everyday , makes the sport more competitive and helps players support themselves financially.

Should college athletes get paid? 69% of people say yes they should. On the other hand, 31% of people disagree. The people say yes because of their dedication and hard work for the sport, while they don't have time for a side job. The people that say no, say this because the school that offered them a scholarship is already saving them and their family a lot of money. People say yes and no and will fight about college athletes getting paid.

The title “student-athlete” does not label college athletes well, the label should read “athlete-student”. Currently, it seems that college sports are a full time job. College athletes have to balance their time between the enormous amount of time in the gym, on the court, or on the field and the significant amount of homework each night. Brad Wolverton wrote an article titled, “NCAA Considers Easing Demands on Athlete’s Time” and stated, “Elite college athletes say they spend 40 or more hours a week on sports, with little downtime between seasons… Other students - particularly those who think they might play professional sports someday - want to dedicate even more time to athletics” (Wolverton 16). With college athletes becoming better through hours of practice and determination, colleges are able to accumulate large sums of money.

Do you often go to college football or basketball games? In his article “NCAA Schools Can Absolutely Afford To Pay College Athletes, Economists Say” Strachan believes that colleges should pay their athletes because they deserve to be paid. Strachan believes this because as economists say most if not all institutions can afford it, “But when it comes to whether the NCAA…. can afford it, the answer appears to be… yes”(par 27). According to Strachan, “They’re nonprofits, and their incentive is to spend every cent that comes in”(par 9), if they have extra money they should just give it to the players, for bringing the college even more publicity and money. In Strachan’s view, it “shouldn’t be surprising”(par 27) that we have enough money to pay

For any college student, one of the most important things to be learned is good time management and study skills. This becomes even more imperative when the student in question is an athlete and has the majority of their day planned out for them. Being a student athlete comes with its own unique set of challenges, including finding a way to balance the amount of time they allot to the sport they play and to their studies. It is a common perception that student athletes spend less time and efforts on their studies than the average college student, but it is not that simple. When considering whether or not student athletes focus the appropriate amount of time on school work, it is necessary to take a deeper look at why they focus on what they do, and some of the factors that influence an athlete and the academic habits they have formed. If student athletes are focusing more on athletics, it would be helpful to understand what drives them to do so; likewise, knowing why athletes are just as dedicated to their academics as they are athletics could help pave the way for all student athletes in the future. Most athletes that are more concerned with their academics have something or someone that influence their academic habits. Influencing factors can include things such as needing to maintain a certain GPA for their coach or a scholarship, or potentially that they use the drive they have developed as an athlete off the court as well.

While, I understand student-athletes at the collegiate level put a lot of time and effort into the sport they play I do not agree with the argument that because they do not have time for a part-time job they should be paid by the school. Participating in a sport at the collegiate level is not a right. Every athlete makes the choice to participate in their respective sport. By making this choice they chose to forgo all other activities that pertain to college students. Collegiate sports is a full time position and many student athletes are aware of this when they choose to participate.