The Benefits Of The Agricultural Industry

Former president George Washington once said, “Agriculture is the most healthful, most useful, and most noble employment of man,” (George Washington Quote). Since Washington’s presidency, countless advancements and developments within the agricultural industry have allowed the United States to grow, develop, and become one of the most prosperous countries in the entire world. Nevertheless, this prosperity is also marked by several key historical events, such as the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions, which have caused the core values and traditions that this great nation was built on to slowly disappear. Today, the majority of Americans have no knowledge, understanding, or appreciation for the agricultural industry, causing them to take for granted the basic necessities they rely on each day. This disconnection has created a gap between producers and consumers, which is known as

Agricultural subsidies is a very complex and controversial economic topic today. It will continue to be a hot topic as government continues it. It is largely debated in the United States as well as in other countries. The reason it is so largely debated is because it literally have an effect on the entire world market. Not to mention that the farm has been booming the last 5 to 10 years. This topic also tends to draw strong opinions in our area in particular due to the large agricultural community in our region. However, even within different states there are many supporters as well as opponents to these government subsidies.

-Mohair farmers have earned a subsidy from the federal government for decades because the mohair farmers can get large payments from the government without taxpayers ever really noticing because the farmers who get the subsidy care a lot about it, while the rest of us taxpayers (paying mere pennies extra in taxes) do not really care. And, “any politician with a preference for job security can calculate that a vote for the mohair subsidy will earn the strong support of the mohair farmers while costing nothing among other voters” (Wheelan 177).

continuation in producing very high amounts of corn and different corn products which has only added to the corruption of the nitrogen cycle but also the agricultural system which has only negatively impacted the American diet. Pollan continues to support his claim of how the government supports and benefits farmers for their corn by bringing up that the US Department of Agriculture pays nineteen billion dollars to farmers each year for their continuation in the production of corn.

Policies and funding support should enable farmers to provide a wider range of benefits and be accessible for long periods of time. We should avoid policies that focus on supporting one benefit, often at the expense of others.

Farm subsidies ARE horrible. Americans can first do themselves a favor and save money by abolishing farm subsidies and trading with developing nations for lower-cost, higher-quality food. This not only puts tax money back into our hands, but we are then able to buy cheaper food, and at the same time help boost an economy of a developing nation. US farm subsidies DO benefit foreign consumers as they get to eat cheaper food that are subsidized by the American taxpayers. While I am all for free market and abolishing subsidies, people need to be more careful in arguing against farm subsidies. Subsidies are wrong because they are paid out of the (unwilling) taxpayers' pockets. Americans are actually doing the rest of the world a great favor by subsidizing them to eat our food.

The Agricultural Act of 2014 or the farm bill is the public face of agriculture policy today. The farm bill authorizes that a portion of taxpayers’ money be spent on different agriculture and nutrition programs in the United States. On February 7, 2014, the latest farm bill was enacted and will remain active until the year 2018. The current farm bill includes twelve sections or titles. These titles include Commodities; Conservation; Trade; Nutrition; Credit; Rural Development; Research, Extension, and Related Matters; Forestry; Energy; Specialty Crops and Horticulture; Crop Insurance; and Miscellaneous (Agricultural Act of 2014: Highlights and Implications).

My friends, I would to take a few minutes to discuss agriculture in this great nation. It has been 14 years since we have heard the cannons boom from Great War, and since then economic stability of our nation has no doubt stumbled on distress. For all the farmers listening, I speak for the people of the United States when I say thank you greatly for the enormous contributions you made to the war effort. You produced a record amount of crops and livestock, all of which aided the men fighting in Europe and the people at home. While the end of the war marked the beginning of a new era, life on the farm began to deteriorate. During the 20s we saw farm and crop prices drop so low. We saw farmers overproducing to pay for their lifestyle and

Agriculture now focuses on growing fast food. I learned about the farm program that the government supported family farms by limiting the number of grains shipped to the market. When the farms were expanded by the changed policy, corn became the king in America agriculture region. The agriculture focuses on results and what works to obtain that end result. However, it is the corporations benefits the most out of this system, not the farmers. Corporate consolidation of the food system from seeds, fertilizers, and food processors has become increasingly concentrated in the past few decades. Corporations that buy corn to turn it into fructose corn syrup have profited by the millions because of the cheap corn while the farmers have to rely on subsidies to

At one point I feel farm subsidies were justified. However, as technology has advance, so has the ability for farmers to facilitate better yields from their land. With the unknown effects of climate change on the agriculture industry, it may be beneficial to the country to maintain these subsidies. There isn’t a problem until the cost of produce skyrockets. If subsidies for farmers disappear there will certainly be a spike in the price of produce. We as a country should do anything possible to maintain that all citizens have access to reasonably priced agriculture

The Farm Bill is a multi-year law that governs a multitude of food and agricultural industries that gives lawmakers the ability to address current concerns in the food and agricultural industry. “Since the 1930s, farm bills traditionally have focused on farm commodity program support for a handful of staple commodities such as corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, rice, dairy, and sugar. Yet farm bills have grown in breadth in recent decades” (Johnson & Monke, 2017). The law has been able to help farmers over the years with crop and livestock loss, insurance and subsidies.

What are subsidies? A subsidy is a government payment or tax credit provided to either the producers or consumers of certain goods. Subsidies are a prime example of cronyism. One very popular subsidy controversy is the sugar subsidies. The existent Sugar Program of the U.S. was introduced in 1934, with the goal of lowering sugar production and raising the price. This system only benefits the sugar industry at cost of American consumers and the taxpayers. Unsurprisingly, the Sugar Program has advanced into a cover of government imposed price supports, import quotas, and tariffs that keep domestic prices way too high. These policies are costing taxpayers and consumers billions of dollars while fostering the perfect climate for cronyism. During

For many years, there have been numerous critics of farm subsidies. Free-market conservatives & welfare state-defending liberals alike have supported deep cuts in these payments to farmers. In many peoples' eyes, farmers are wealthier than the average American. So why should farmers get tens of billions of dollars each year in the form of federal aid? According to the authors of the Farm Bill, there would be bold cuts in some of these controversial subsidy programs. The opposition to the Farm Bill argued that cutting/eliminating one big subsidy altogether would save taxpayers a total of approximately $23 billion over a period of ten years. However, according to the Congressional Budget Office, total government aid to farmers will swell to $24 by this year (2017). In my opinion, despite what the politicians in Washington say, farmers will always get their money. That is, the agriculture committees in the Congress will always make sure that farmers get their money.

Agriculture was the most important economic activity in America from the founding of Virginia in 1607 to about 1890. Although farming declined rapidly in relative economic importance in the twentieth century, U.S. agriculture continued to be the most efficient and productive in the world. Its success rested on abundant fertile soil, a moderate climate, the ease of private land ownership, growing markets for farm produce at home and abroad, and the application of science and technology to farm operations.

One of the reasons for a government to give subsidies is to ensure local output. Government will give out subsidies to local sectors, like farms and small businesses, helping them to set up or to continue their production. Although there are always imported goods from other countries, they cannot be fully relied on. Take agricultural production as an example, China