The Best Candidate For The Pizza Hut

In his article “The Shame of College Sports,” Taylor Branch (2011) describes how universities are focused on advancing and receiving money from major athletics and having star athletes, but how the universities are not caring for the “student athlete.” The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has made college sports into an unmerited business. However, as years progress more athletes are getting smart and are taking the NCAA to court. The more students that challenges the rules by the NCAA and take them to court, the secrets and undermining values of the NCAA come out and the closer the NCAA comes to an end.

College athletics are becoming more like the professional leagues except for one big issue, money. Student athletes bring in a vast amount of revenue for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) not to mention recognition and notoriety regarding the athlete’s university. However, the debate continues as to whether student athletes should or should not receive payment for playing college sports.

Not only do the players play hard for the school, but they also have the potential to earn money through commercial signings and endorsements by third party sponsors. The NCAA should lift the “Principle of Amateurism” and establish a newer one that resembles the one of the Olympics. The Olympics’ amateur model resembles the NCAA’s “Principle of Amateurism” except for the fact that they do not have restrictions on commercial opportunities such as

This is most likely the reason these young athletes elect to turn professional early. With the NCAA bringing in more money every year and student athletes starting to ask for a chuck of the profit pie. Should student athletes get paid for the helping the NCAA grow its brand or should they continue to be strictly amateurs?

Many believe NCAA athletes should be paid for their performance. According to Patterson athletes are huge assets to universities. Colleges and Universities are well aware of athlete’s abilities upon recruiting. Universities recruit top athletes in hopes of increasing the university the top athlete attends chance to compete for a championship. Sports analyst have reported that deals made between NCAA

College sports are big money makers, at least that’s what most people think, right? The truth is they are, but out of the 23 sports managed by the NCAA, the only college sports that really make money is Division I basketball and football. And out of these sports, the only ones who will earn money is the universities who make it to the playoffs and championships.

For years there has been a debate whether college athletes should be paid for playing for their university in the NCAA. The NCAA basketball tournament known as March Madness, is a tournament that generates billions of dollars in revenue every year and the student athletes receive no payment for playing and generating their schools

Student athletes should be compensated for their craft, they are the sole reason for the athletic program’s surplus in revenue. Student athletes put in a average of 43.5 hours a week just dedicated to their sport. The amount of time they put in is more than the American average work week which consists of 40 hours. Despite the success of NCAA tournaments, athletes fail to receive any monetary compensation. The NCAA does not pay athletes because they want to maintain its amateur status and the payment would compromise the integrity of intercollegiate

"It's time for all sports fans to wake up and realize that the current system benefits only the elite few who continue to perpetuate the myth of amateur athletics." - Brian Frederick. Many people have been debating about wether NCAA athletics should be paid. Coaches and players are wanting to chose this due to the number of career-ending injuries which have left players with nothing. Some people think that if we start paying NCAA athletics, they will chose to go to the school that will pay them the most money instead of picking the schools with the nicest campus or the best education. While this may be true, NCAA athletes should be paid because schools make a lot of money, why not share it with the people who are risking their careers, players are not allowed to have a job, and people think that college sports are simpler and less corrupt.

The NCAA makes most of its money off of TV and marketing fees, with most of the revenue coming from Division I Basketball during its annual “March Madness” tournament. A lot of the money that the NCAA receives goes towards scholarships and schools. Players do not get paid for their participation in the NCAA, which brings a lot of controversy to the subject because without the players, the NCAA would be nothing. Yet, the NCAA gives the opportunity for the players to show off their skills in hopes of the student athlete becoming a professional.

College athletes are the face of the NCAA, without them it would be nothing. Even though they are the ones who keep it running, they are given no money. It is a corrupt system that takes advantage of its athletes. The athletes bring in millions of dollars to their schools, scholarships do not cover the full cost of attending school, they are forced to go to college before the pros, and the athletes work more on their sport each week, than the average american works on their job, yet they receive none of the revenue.

Athletes form the basic unit of intercollegiate sports. Despite the success of NCAA tournaments, athletes do not receive any money for play. The main reason fronted by the NCAA for lack of payment is that payment would compromise the honor of intercollegiate athletics. It has increased its profits through the sale of merchandise, television rights and licenses for video games. Athletes play an active role in the promotion of these activities but do not benefit from the money that is made. This can be viewed as mistreatment and is unethical.

Year after year fans enjoy nail biting moments produced by the NCAA basketball tournament and football season. Many would argue that the NCAA provides a product that matches up with the professionals both competitively and financially. The only difference is that professionals get paid for the revenue that they bring in while NCAA athletes do not. It is time for change, college athletes should be monetarily compensated because they are the ones who have made the NCAA profitable for many years.

With these reason in mind, people can empathize and support the student athletes. They go through lots of obstacles in exchange for the education; however, they are standing on the verge of danger. The student athletes would be losing the scholarship any time the NCAA says so. They also are risking their health for every tournament and practice. Therefore, the NCAA should pay student athletes for their high performance on the field and for their sweat at

There is a great debate going on about whether division one athletes should receive a new form of compensation due to the authenticity they bring to the country.. According to many sources, most people believe that the athletes shouldn’t receive any new money due to the fact that they already are rewarded by scholarships. With colleges providing higher paying scholarships, the NCAA believes they don’t need to make good with the athletes for their work. Although many people suppose that the NCAA/universities already compensate division one athletes through scholarships, majority of the nation believes that they should be paid an exceptional acquisition.