The Between Germany And France

market, there is price competition. This can lead to price wars and, therefore, lower prices for

It creates equal and fair pricing. The economy would be tyrannical without competition, that is why they made a policy to destroy any monopolies from forming because if they were able to form and take over that area of the market and raise prices outrageously to whatever they feel would make them as much profit as possible while not raising too many suspicions. However if there is a monopoly they would be able to raise the prices however high they want because there is no other companies selling that same product at a cheaper price. Competition creates fair prices because take for example two gas stations right across the street from each other. They are both getting solid business until one decides to lower the price of his gas ten cents. The other gas station notices twice as many cars at the other one and decides to lower his fifteen cents. This just keeps going on until they have to stay in a certain range so they can still make a profit, but this is how competition stabilizes the economy. Competition also makes companies come out with new and innovative ideas to grab that portion of the economy. In other economy's where there is communism they don’t create products to the best of their ability or try to create new things as they are all getting paid the same so there is no incentive for employers or employees to work harder. Competition is what makes the U.S come out with the latest technology, latest cars, phones, and anything you can think of. An example of a big time monopoly was John D Rockefeller, he was able to control everything, prices, products, elections it just creates solo dominance in the market which is not good. We need different products in the economy and different versions of products for every different person and every different cause for wanting that product. The U.S economy is number second in the world now which is why we are so great and have so many varieties of products. This

2. Natural monopolies are industries in which it is efficient to have only one producer; in such situations, there is unlikely to be effective competition in the market equilibrium. This lack of competition provides a major reason for government production of private goods. An alternative to public production is government regulation. Whereas the United States has, for the most part, addressed the problem of natural monopolies through regulation, until

The Internal Market of the European Union (EU) is one of Europe’s significant achievements and its greatest resource in times of modern globalisation. Since its creation in 1993, the Internal Market has opened itself more to competition, created jobs and reduced many trade barriers. It is the principal instrument for building a stronger and fairer economy in the EU. It assures the free movement of people, services, goods and capital, and by doing so, creates fresh opportunities for businesses and consumers. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union adopts measures with the aim of combining national markets in a single market with the characteristics of a domestic market. The vision is that it should be as easy to trade between London and Madrid as it is between London and Manchester.

In some cases where products produced by the government are subsidized then privatization leads to an increase in prices, when the government owns these firms then the consumers will experience a reduction in the price of goods and services produced by these firms and therefore gain.

This is where industry regulations come. The regulations discourages the monopolies and oligopolies from charging unfair prices for their products.

Free markets have often been idealized in the US, and have become a dominant tool for trade and distribution of goods and services. There have been multiple waves of government regulation and deregulation of the market in US history. Each of these trends have been grappling with the central question of how sufficient markets are at satisfying our goals. In theory, free markets are fair and efficient at distributing goods and services. In reality, however, government must intervene in the marketplace for two overarching reasons. First, because in practice free markets left to themselves are not always fair and efficient. And second, because fairness and efficiency are not our only goals and

there are a number of different buyers and sellers in the marketplace. This means that we have competition in the market, which allows price to change in response to changes in supply and demand. Furthermore, for almost every product there are substitutes, so if one product becomes too expensive, a buyer can choose a cheaper substitute instead. In a market with many buyers and sellers, both the consumer and the supplier have equal ability to influence price.

The allocation of resources has been long debated by society, the government and economists. The pay gap between the rich and poor continues to grow and to accommodate this there are taxes, government restrictions and policies. The economic pie is never equally divided and wont be in a capitalist economy however, trying to narrow the gap between the rich and poor will overall be beneficial to society. Thus, the two rules of fairness come into play, ‘it is not fair if the result isn’t fair’ and ‘it’s not fair if the rules aren’t fair’.

E., & Gould, J. P., 1966). Furthermore, the members are price takers and do not have the power to influence price changes. We now understand that perfectly competitive markets are very rare and that in reality our product exists in a different type of market. The four types of markets are: Monopoly, Oligopoly, Monopolistic competition, and perfect competition. Our company has gained enough power in the market to influence price and allow it to choose its own optimal price. This means that establishing an equilibrium where QD = QS does not necessarily apply. Perhaps our company has developed an innovation that makes the quality of our microwave meal much better than our competitors or we have developed a process than drastically lowers the cost of processing the ingredients for our product. Regardless of the reason, our company now has a competitive advantage and we must take advantage of it in order to become dominant in our industry.

In the free market, we have to choose between buying or selling goods. This determines whether products are a higher price value or a lower price value. The government has made to many decisions for us. We have to stand up and fight for his economy.

A market is either a physical place or a tool that allows buyers and sellers to come together to exchange goods and services with one another. In this economy, peoples purchases count as votes, and once all the votes are counted, the producers can tell what the people want. Therefore, the consumers play a key role in determining what to produce. The United States, Canada, and Germany are some examples of a market economy. An advantage is that this economy can gradually adjust to change. Individual freedom is encouraged in this type of economy, so people can produce what they think will sell. Consumers can spend their money on whatever goods or services they prefer. The government also doesn’t interfere much with the people because as long as competition exists, the economy takes care of itself. A final advantage is that there is a high variety on goods and services available, and that plays into the high level of consumer satisfaction. A disadvantage of this economy is that is doesn’t provide for everyone’s basic needs in their country, and it doesn’t provide enough of the services that people value highly. Another disadvantage is change leaves people and businesses uncertain of their future. If a few conditions are not met, a market economies could easily

The United States is known to operate in a free market economy. In other words, the economy is based solely on supply and demand with little to no government control. In reality, however, the United States has various government regulations on our country’s market. The amount of regulation that is necessary is a continuing debate among politicians and economists to this day. Some would say that the key to a successful market economy is to remove government restrictions in order to force businesses to provide superior products and services at affordable prices. Yet, others assert that government regulations are essential in protecting consumers, stemming from the assumption that corporations are not always looking out for the public’s interest. Of course, there are various advantages and disadvantages associated with each level of regulation, however it is safe to assume that there must be a balance between an unregulated free market and a regulated economy in order to protect people and the environment and allow the economy to flourish.

The bargaining power of buyers: Buyers have more control over an industry than one might think. They want lower prices, higher quality, and more services and this makes the competitors play against each other. The profitability suffers as each competitor tries to make their product or service better (Dess, p. 54). McDonald’s has a $1.00 menu as does Burger King and Wendy’s. Each time I go into either of them there is a better item added to the $1.00 menu. For instance, McDonald’s has the scrumptious Double Cheeseburger and Wendy’s has the

With the effect of the Single European Act on 1st July 1987, the emergence of European Union (EU) as a common market has essentially been created. The benefits of this act are substantial to European firms, economies, and workers. It eliminates conflicting national regulations and trade barriers, as well as offering firms opportunity to sell their goods to all other EU members (Griffin & Pustay 2005).