Essay on The Blаck Subculture-of-Violence Thesis

This report will begin by making a distinction between the concepts of crime and deviance, accompanied by the concept that crime is a social construct. Then this report will evaluate some theoretical approaches to how and why crime exists. Further reference will be made to the existing crime statistics, and the validity and reliability of the official statistics that measure crime. Finally, this report will look into the presentation of crime in two areas of the mass media.

Crime is a socially created existence that contains deficiencies of any equitable principles that demarcate into existence rather than being revealed. Social construction means that humans have recognized a phenomenon; characterized and labeling it to some interpretive statute that transcribes the differentiations and likenesses contained by the objects or people while classified. Many categorization patterns are not subjective; otherwise, attempting to make sense of classification would be impossible. Categories have analytical and significant denotations and are utilized to execute the order on the variety of social experiences. Gender, race, and class construct the experiences of all individuals. These facts are extensively acknowledged and ordinarily understood.

Every decade brings a new “Eureka!” In the 70s, we became convinced that urban poverty caused violence. In the 80s, it was all due to mental illness, and in the 90s substance abuse was definitely the culprit. Now it’s malfunctioning brains that are to blame (Edersheim, Price, and Smoller).

     Crime has been a plague on society from ancient times to present. In response to

A behavior of violence may be best defined as the conduct that causes harm or threatens to cause harm to other people. The kind of harm that results from violent behavior may either be physical or emotional. Violent behavior ranges from verbal abuse to destruction of physical property. In the case of physical property, the victim of the violent behavior suffers destruction of personal property. There are various characteristics that characterize individuals with violent behavior. Some of these characteristics include irritability, restlessness, and impulsiveness among others. In most cases, violent behavior is usually intentional in the sense that an individual makes a choice to engage in violence. Although understanding the causes of violent behavior is a very complex subject, there are various theoretical frameworks that have been developed and those that help explaining violent behavior. The sociological theories help in explaining the process through which an individual becomes a serial killer. Though they approach the same subject from different perspectives; these theories have areas of convergence as well as divergence.

They would then be introduced to violent norms unfamiliar to him, which he would soon become accustomed to, resulting in them to gain violent tendencies and habits. This. Would especially worsern as they progress from their teenage years to adulthood, carrying these jagged norms with them, especially as they may experience resocialization by altering their norms. One result of the norms, in particular, would be within school which due to his newly gained social capital after becoming apart from that group, heavily affects the quality of education one receives. In this specific scenario, two variables which directly influence the education of our case study are Social and Cultural Capital (Sirin, 2005).A major factor in the quality of education a student receives is Social

The causes of crime in the United States of America can stem from the biology, sociology, or psychology of a person. This reasoning is because the underlying cause of crime is contingent upon the biological and psychological state of a person as well as the social group in which the individual decides to dwell. The fatal mixture of these forces have the capability to formulate an evil and wicked criminal. An individual’s psychological background, social impact and media influence can weigh heavy on an individual’s choice with crime. The spread of crime has a negative effect in our society, especially with our youth.

During their lives, each person has some contact with violence, whether they are the victim, the perpetrator, an observer, or a combination of these roles. The culture of a certain group of people emphasizes and explains these violent actions in different ways. It can be described from an anthropological perspective as well, but it sometimes varies from the explanations given within a specific culture. Through a series of interviews with university students, I found that their explanations of violence were actually quite similar to the anthropological perspective. Specifically, both the interviews and the anthropological studies emphasized the relationship between violence and culture, the ways that social structures determine the practices

Nordstrom (1998) suggests that one of the key determinants of violent acts is a strong connection to an ideology or group identity. In both the Bourgois (2001) and Henry (2005) readings the authors affirm that ideology is a key motivator of conflict, however they both also provide evidence of the notions of functional conflict (Coser, 1956) and social differentiation (Simmel, 1964) whereby they talk about conflict and violence as expressions of social relations, which is supported by Coser (1956) who suggests that conflict between groups is a function of social relations. For example, Simmel (1964) and Coser (1956) on the idea of conflict as functional, argue that violent conflict leads to clearer definition of boundaries of conflict groups,

My prior research focused on the multidisciplinary understanding of violence from a public health context, and the behavioral aspects of how healthcare applications may be adopted by people. With the Yale Violence and Health group, I enjoyed learning about the multidisciplinary understanding of violence in a health context for the possibility of interdisciplinary solutions. It was interested to see how socioeconomic and political factors affect behavior and health, and particularly in our research, violent death rates. I am the 3rd author of an analysis paper in the journal Aggression and Violent Behavior. The research provided a macro perspective on behavior and health; however, I became interested in how these macro considerations affect

violence are rooted in the family, the community, the imitation of the behavioral patterns, and the

The larger and more concerning analysis conducted by A history of Violence is the shift amongst

The Cycle of Violence: Understanding Individual Participation in Collective Violence examines why individuals that have no interest in harming others and do not have any violent interest carry out violence. Within the review violence is defined as “intentionally harming another person, causing bodily injury or death” (Littman and Paluck 80). Collective violence is defined as causing violence within a group setting. Typically, violence is carried out in two perspectives: the situationist perspective and the group identity and intergroup conflict perspectives. Human’s are socialized to “do no harm” to another human; however, when the responsibility of the act is put into the hands of another person, they are more likely to cause violence. Additionally, stated within the review, group identification and violence work simultaneously. As group identification increases, so does the violence, and vice versa.

And that’s not all. “Men,” writes Nolasco, “are always the ones who define the contours and the records of violence. Upon organizing a table by sex, it can be verified that violence has no color, age, or social class, but it has a sex”.

The culture of violence theory is generally defined as a culture that promotes violence in its “direct or structural form” (Galtung, 1990). In parts of society that promote it, it often shows up in everything from its artistic expression to its (often biased) scientific experimentation (Galtung, 1990). The individuals who are immersed in such a culture, hence, are often convinced that the use of violence is the answer to power and control.