preview

The Boy In The Striped Pyjamas Analysis

Decent Essays

The novel “The Boy in the striped pyjamas” is written by John Boyne and explores the thoughts and implications of the holocaust through the perspective of a young boy named Bruno. Bruno the main protagonist is portrayed as being as being unaware of the atrocities of war. This is shown many times throughout the text. However, it is Bruno’s interactions with other key characters that makes his innocence obvious to the reader. In particular, his innocent perspective regarding the Nazi concentration camp, as well as, his interactions with his father and Shmuel reveal his lack of awareness.

Bruno and concentration camp/Gretel:
Innocence is obvious in many of the relationships that Bruno forms throughout the novel, but his interactions with …show more content…

Bruno is, of course, completely wrong, this is the sort of thing Father wants the Jews to do, but there is nothing "all right" about it. His father, in whom Bruno has faith, is the one who is bringing about the deaths of so many, his own son included. These examples clearly show that Bruno’s innocent perspective and lack of knowledge of the purpose of the concentration camp and the situations that were occurring being an innocent nine year old boy.

Bruno & Shmuel:
Though separated by a fence throughout the novel, Shmuel and Bruno share a certain childlike innocence, and an innate sense of curiosity about the metaphorical “other side”. The reality is Shmuel is a young Polish jew who does not understand why he is in the concentration camp being punished. Through his innocence, Shmuel although imprisoned in the concentration camp, views Bruno not as a symbol of domination that has locked him in a camp, but just as another boy who happens to be on the other side of a fence. Both Shmuel and Bruno represent innocence. One specific example of Shmuel's innocence is when he describes the armbands that he had to wear every time he left the house. “No one's ever given me an armband’, said Bruno. ‘But i never asked to wear one’ said Shmuel (pg 127). This shows the innocence of both Shmuel and Bruno, in that they don't fully understand the purpose of the armbands. Another example of Shmuel's innocence occurs

Get Access