In Dickenson’s “The Brain---is wider than the Sky---“she explores the subject of ‘the self’ through the complicated relationship seen between the outer world, and the individual mind. The first line highlights the brain’s ability to take in and perceive all of our experiences and moments in life, suggesting that this capability exceeds the sky in size due to the mind’s overwhelming capacity. Dickenson claims if you put the brain and the sky side by side, the sky would be easily consumed by the mind. The second stanza, “The Brain is deeper than the sea---“ supports the same idea that the mind could absorb the ocean and its depths, much like a sponge with a bucket of water. In the last stanza Dickenson makes the striking comparison of the mind
Laws and rules are what set people apart from savagery. Leaders are what keep a group alive in times of crisis. In Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, Piggy is the only character who remains civil and does not turn to savagery. The boys notice his appearance more than his brain which blinds them from seeing his intelligence, patience, and rationality.
Many people have their own views on humanity. They can either be that humans are essentially good but can become corrupt or that people are just essentially evil. They have their own opinions, some people can tell their perspective on humans in other fashions. If people are essentially good, they how do they become corrupt? Or if are truly evil, then why do some people seem like they are kind people and they can never do such things? To take both of these into account, a person may saw that people are good but deep down have evil within them. People may ask how does the evil within a person come out, the answer to that is that it is thanks to their environment. The environment around a person can undoubtedly draw out the evil within them
After detecting smoke coming from the island a British naval officer goes to investigate: “I should have thought that a pack of british boys- you’re all british aren’t you- would have been able to put up a better show than that,” (Golding 202). Britain was one of the most advanced societies of the early to mid 1900’s, and complete mayhem emerging out of a group of British boys stranded on an island is more than shocking for the naval officer. It is ironic that the same boys who boldly stated, “We 've got to have rules and obey them. After all, we 're not savages. We 're English, and the English are best at everything,” (Golding 40), quickly regressed into the primal habits of mob mentality. Lord of the Flies was written shortly after World War II. A strong connection can be made between the leadership of the antagonist, Jack, and World War II icon: Hitler. The two leaders both display devoted followers, and a corrupt sense of leadership and control. Golding insists that fear and mob mentality provoke irrational thinking by placing Jack and his followers’ unintelligible response to fear in contrast with Ralph and Piggy’s diplomatic approach. Furthermore, Jack and his followers overcome their fear by providing comfort for each other with a tribal attitude, which ultimately leads to mindless calamity on the island.
Every human being has a neutral nature, but making that nature inherently good or bad depends on the person and his surroundings. In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, talks about a plane that crashed into an island and killed all the adults, but a group of school boys left survived, and they became increasingly savage. The characters’ natures are inherently good in this text.
Lord of the Flies tells a story about a group of school boys who are twelve and younger. They crash on an unknown island whilst they are being evacuated at the dawn of the next world war. Ralph, who is the protagonist of the story, struggles to maintain vestiges of civilization against the call of human nature and savagery. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies is a hero’s story because Ralph, the elected leader of the boys, portrays the archetypal hero, he faces a road of trails like all heroes do, and, he gains gifts from his journey.
Does every human have an inbred evil quality within their soulful selves? Nobel-Prize winning author, William Golding accurately exemplifies the fact that evil is an inborn characteristic in “Lord of the Flies” one of his finest books explaining to his readers the acrimonious truth about human nature. Golding started establishing his pessimistic view about human nature throughout his times at World War Two where he came to realize that everyone has some sort of cruelty within them and it is a natural part of mankind. Set during the time period of World War Two, the book is about a group of English boys being evacuated safely out of the country, but the plane crashes, leaving the boys stranded on a deserted island, the boys try to manage themselves in a civilized way, but instead end up becoming savage. Lacking of being in a civilized area, Roger one of the characters, starts attaining pleasure from hurting others. Jack the antagonist of the novel, due to his immense lust for power, he started showing attributes of savagery. Ralph the protagonist of the book who started off kind and supportive towards the idea of civilization, he too became a victim of savagery later on. As portrayed by Golding through the symbolic representation of the “Beast”, evil is an inborn characteristic that cannot be evaded and is forever within humankind. Similar to the Yin-Yang, a Chinese symbol for qualities in life, states that there is a bit of bad within everything good and a bit of good within
Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. Through the story, the Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, uprising or leadership transpired. Most of the conflict of leadership was between the two main characters, Jack and Ralph. One being the antagonist (Jack) who craved power and the protagonist (Ralph) who fought for survival and respect. In a group, their are people who have better qualities that best suits them for the role of the leader, in this situation, Ralph was the best leader.
Dinaw Mengestu’s riveting novel, All Our Names, is a story about so many complex aspects of life and revolves around a theme of humanity. It can, more or less, be viewed as two separate stories that eventually collide with the characters from each representing diverse views of what it means to be human. With vastly different experiences being represented, the reader is able to see the struggle of people trying to survive in a country torn by politics as well as the struggle of a relationship trying to survive in a country torn by hate. So appropriately referenced in the novel was Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities as what the characters experienced truly were the best of times and the worst of times. And while
Sometimes people wear fake personas like a cloak over their shoulders, used to hide what is really underneath. This harsh reality is witnessed in William Golding’s classic Lord of the Flies, a novel that is famous for not only its sickening plot, but also for the emotional breakdowns all of its characters experience. These issues are akin to those shown in certain real-world psychological experiments. A summary of Golding’s Lord of the Flies, combined with the evidence shown in a psychological experiment referred to as “The Bystander Effect”, describe how the disturbing behaviors in each scenario parallel one another and show the dark side of humanity.
In the novel “Lord of the Flies” there are several symbols of interpretations in terms of meaning. The beast within the novel, “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding was never a monster, however neither was it really human (Shmoop). On a stranded island alone with no adults to look below the bed or look within the closet, there are sure to be ghosts and monsters roaming amongst the forest woods, and from the very start this belief of some monster hiding within the darkness is unfolded around the whole pack. One of the little boys claims that "the beasty only come out in the dark." (LOTF) All of the boys, have no one to shield them from their nightmares and fears of the night terrors or any monster that will really be on the island.
Over thousands of years of civilization, leaders have achieved success and also obtained misfortune. The fashion in which they achieve their success differs from one another. What makes one leader better than another depends on the scenario. It is hard to quantify this because each leader has their own unique qualities. However, for the most part, the shift and yearning of power is what corrupts. In Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding uses the dynamics of power to develop how the desire and shift of power causes chaos and creates an uncivilized environment. In Lord of the Flies, the desire and shift of power is what ends up breaking the boys ' feeble attempt at civilization. It is ruined through conflict and unnecessary competition. Jack’s use of tyrannical leadership, Ralph’s loss of control with his democratic leadership style and Roger’s attempt to gain power are all examples of how the thirst for power ends causing corruption on the island. Absolute power corrupts and potentially defined power creates a greater society.
“You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself in any direction you choose.” By Dr. Seuss. I know it is a little kiddish of me to say a quote by Dr. Seuss in front of some thousands of kids here today this evening, but the reason I shared this quote with you guys today was because it holds a very unique and important message and is why all of us are standing here today.
In many novels, the society created by the author is surrounded by wealth and corruption. Numerous amount of times these settings are produced based on the life in which the author lives. Charles Dickens is no different. In the midst of most of his novels, Dickens exposes the deception of Victorian England and the strict society that holds everything together. In Dickens' novel Our Mutual Friend, a satire is created where the basis of the novel is the mockery against money and morals. Throughout this novel, multiple symbols and depictions of the characters display the corruption of the mind that surrounds social classes in Victorian England.
Civilization has been mankind’s attempt to quell the natural savagery that most humans hold. However, civilization is imperfect and will often get destroyed once the natural savagery of humans finds no limits and there is not enough that is done about disobeying of rules and order. The conflict may stay at a stalemate for some time, but eventually the savagery of humans will eventually win out. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding uses the conflict between Ralph and Jack to show that when savagery and order conflict with each other, savagery will usually win out over order in the long run.
Dickinson uses imagery to compare the sky and brain “The one the other will contain”(3). The sky is a huge entity, but the quality of size isn’t being analyzed in this line. Looking at the sky you can see the detail in it, however, looking at a brain you cannot see the function within it. The brain has the power to grasp knowledge, sensor, and most importantly give some organism the ability to function. The depth beyond a brain and the importance of it’s function serve a bigger purpose than the sky allowing it to “contain” over the sky. Like the sky the ocean isn’t compared to the brain due to vastness. The ocean and the brain has similarity as the ocean reaches to a very low point of the area and the brain reaches deep level of depth of knowledge it is able to learn. However, one exceed limit beyond its reach as the ocean has a limit to reach certain areas as its stopped due to it’s environment. Looking at the brain it can understand new concept of learning every single day as it functions allowing. The ability to grasp knowledge has no limit compared to the ocean demonstrating that the depth is greater between the brain and ocean. Using the sky and ocean in comparison of the brain emphasizes the abstract limit of the