The Business Of Human Rights Chapter 1 Summary

Human rights can be summarized as the activities and freedoms that all human beings are entitled to enjoy and only by virtue of their humanity. These conditions are generally guaranteed in the constitution of the land. They are widely felt in the area as they are divided and not limited to political, social economic and cultural rights. Some of the main principles of human rights include the fact that they are inherent, inalienable and indivisible as well. In this relation, human rights can never be taken away from an individual whereby the enjoyment of one right should not infringe the enjoyment of other. They must all be respected and maintained.

In today’s America, it is a constant debate: Do we have true equal rights? The obvious answer to most people is no, and we probably never will. Though some people seem to live in ignorant bliss, thinking that everything is going well and everyone is being treated fairly, they are wrong. The theme of not having adequate human rights is commonly shown through the unjustness in documents one, three, and five.

The topic of human rights has been a well-documented and deliberated subject throughout history. There are various conflicting views about human rights, many of which have led to conflict’s in the past. American philosopher Martha Nussbaum detailed her capabilities approach on the theory of human rights in 2001 in “Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Nussbaum’s central human capabilities have since been used in a wide variety of philosophy literature, notably in “Cosmopolitanism a philosophy for global ethics” by Stan Van Hooft. Nussbaum’s capabilities theory is centred around 10 major elements. This essay will critique and analyse Nussbaum’s theory, and assess if Nussbaum’s elements are of central importance to understanding human rights. In my opinion, what is of central importance to human rights is fair values and equal opportunity. This entails that every individual no matter what situation they are born into should have adequate access to resources to reach their full potential. This includes and is not limited to race, gender, sexual orientation and religion. Society has recently started to take a stand against this violation of our human rights and will hopefully continue to stamp out any negative behaviour hindering the potential of individuals in society. Throughout this essay the capabilities that Nussbaum outlined will be individually evaluated on whether they are of central importance in understanding human rights and if they follow within what I believe to be of central importance to understanding human rights.

Human Rights is one of the most fundamental rights individuals should have in society. As individuals, it’s our natural right to have the right to life. No one should be executed or discriminated because they do not fit in certain characteristics that those that are superior have outlined as fit for society. Many countries suffer from the lack of protecting their citizens’ human rights. For instance, citizens have been executed and discriminated because of their gender, race, and religion affiliations, which is unjust. Individuals have lost their lives because of not having their country making sure their right to life and freedom does not get taking away. For instance, the persecution of the Jews by the Nazi’s, many of them lost their life because of a lack of human right to protect them from being executed without a logic purpose. As a society we can not construct some criteria as to whom can have human rights and those that cannot. Society is not supposing to be built on unjust acts against those in society. As individuals, everyone should be able to live in a more just and humane society. This paper will focus on the human rights and exactly what is human rights. In addition, explore the genocide that happens under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, which resulted in millions of Jews lives being taken away and trying to cause extinction to the European Jewish community. In addition, focus on the aftermath of educating individuals about human rights after the historical

Human rights are protected under Australian law in three key ways; statute law, the constitution and common law. It could be argued that if Australia adopted a bill of rights, human rights would be more clearly defined, consistent in all states and territories and more easily understood.

All human beings are born with equal and inalienable rights and fundamental freedoms, but where was this saying when the Holocaust was going on? The Holocaust was the biggest, most brutal, and baddest mass killing of a single race. The people on the side of the Holocaust did not listen to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or anything to persuade them to stop killing Jews. All humans deserve the rights given to them by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The poor are not the only social disadvantaged group in Mexico. Ciudad Juárez, is a remarkable gender focus case in the Mexican crime scene. Connected to the Juárez cartel, the city is deeply plagued with crime, drug trafficking and corruption; not only so, it is most recognizable for its heinous cases of feminicide. After the North American Free Trade Agreement, Mexico was invaded with maquiladoras along its border, thus giving the opportunity of employment, as wells as, encouraging the migration of mostly young women to Ciudad Juárez. The high concentration of vulnerable women in Juárez is only equal to the high rates of murder and abuse of women. According to Amnesty International – a non-governmental organization focused on human rights – more than “800 bodies had been

The fight for human rights has always been marched since the World War II from women rights to certain ethnicity rights. Everyone wants to be treated equally because everyone shares the same emotions and has dreams and ambitions. It is important to empower individuals through values of tolerance, equality and respect for a good society to function. Then why is it different with animals as they also have emotions and purposes? Devaluing animal rights because humans are higher in the hierarchy or the food chain is pompous as animals have emotions and the feeling of pain and pleasure just as humans do. Each year in the Unites States, an estimated number of seventy million innocent animals undergo hurtful and deadly suffering in the name of science by scientific centers, cosmetic companies, household products, and educational institutions. Animal testing is wrong. This is because the action is unethical, ineffective, and unnecessary.

The mistreatment of women in the Middle East desecrates the human rights Americans claim all should have. In the second article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.” 203 countries around the world recognize the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and are apart of the United Nations organization itself, if 203 countries agree to govern and provide the rights the Declaration states, then why must women in certain regions receive permission

The Human Rights Act of 1998, also abbreviated to HRA is a national law passed in the United Kingdom and mostly came into force on 2 October 2000. Its purpose is to incorporate the rights within the European Convention on Human Rights into UK national law. This law allows the citizens of the United Kingdom to defend their rights in UK courts and states that public organisations such as the Government, Police and other public authorities must respect the people’s rights by treating them fairly and equally with dignity. Firstly, this essay will be discussing what the Human Rights Act (1998) is and its effects. Secondly, this essay will be pointing out the Articles and explaining the Act. Thirdly, this essay will be talking about the history and why this act came into place. Finally, this essay will argue the necessity of the Human Rights Act (1998).

All people are entitled to various basic rights which should not be desecrated under any situation. Some of these rights include political rights, civil liberties and most importantly the right to physical safety and life. Human rights bodies articulate for tolerance, justice, human dignity and mutual respect for all people. Human rights are protected by ensuring that all people receive humane and decent treatment. Denying people their basic rights are violating them and it’s a terrible offense which can face a strict legal response. Everything that violates people’s rights or prevents them from enjoying ought to be eliminated with immediate effect.. Many people from all over the world cannot access some services due to poverty.

The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background

The Human Rights Act ‘The Human Rights Act in its present form, besides failing to properly

Glendon, Mary Ann (2002). A world made new: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Random House. ISBN

“The right to life is illusory without a right to the protection of the means by which alone life can be lived. And, the right to life can only be taken away or abridged by a procedure established by law, which has to be fair and reasonable, not fanciful or arbitrary such.” (Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation,1985 SCC (3) 545) Discuss the law relating to the right to live in India.