The Caabans Revolt

When America was first starting off, there were some tensions within the colonies. Some of the tensions led to rebellions. Two rebellions that come to mind, is the Bacon rebellion and the Pueblo rebellion. They both showed how America had tensions with different groups of people. They both transpired because the lower class was being oppressed. Even though they were different they both pointed out the tensions in the colonies.

Lorenz Fries stresses this anger in his report to the Archbishop of Wurzburg, as he describes the wealth’s inability to share their profits and income with the poor (Doc 8). The peasants believe they are entitled to a share of wealth because all are considered to be brothers in the public eye of God. Considering Fries’s report is secret, it most likely states his candid opinions (Pov3). Although economic oppression is a crucial factor in pushing the revolt, Protestant influence is responsible for the revolt as well.

The Texas Revolution is a historical war that began in October of 1835 and ended in April 1836. Even before the war began, there existed hostilities between the groups of colonists and the official forces. This was culminated with the by the political and social differences that fueled the revolution. The conflict was majorly witnessed between the Mexican rulers and the Anglo-American residents of Texas (Tshaonline.org, 2015). Several accounts have been given by various eyewitnesses on the events of the Texas Revolution.

The cause of the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 has brought up a substantial amount of controversy between historians. Several historians took the preserved historical documents and gathered information from oral history to try and piece together the reason why the Pueblos revolted to begin with. Some historians point to religion as the sole cause, while others say it required the right leader, and still others point to the racial segregation and mixture of the Pueblos and Spanish blood as the cause of the revolt. While each historian has his own viewpoint, it is important to look into the reasons why each come to their own specific conclusions and determine if their argument is a biased or a balanced perspective. The main things to consider are

The Gabriel Rebellion was a revolt organized in the summer of 1800 by a man whom many call Gabriel Prosser. His last name was derived from his master, Thomas Prosser. The main objective of the revolt was to fight for the freedom of black slaves held within the state of Virginia. However, the revolt did not materialize because word spread around before the plan could be executed. Immediately after the governor got wind of the revolt, security was beefed up around Richmond where the uprising had been planned to start. Nonetheless, the rebellion had an impact on the treatment of slaves in Virginia. For instance, the unrestricted movement of slaves within the state was banned along with the practice of hiring out slaves. The government also enacted a law that prohibited freed slaves from staying within the state boundaries for more than twelve months. Taking everything into account, although the Gabriel Rebellion did not materialize, it did change the manner in which slaves were treated and hastened their emancipation.

El Mozote is a city in El Salvador, and in 1981 it was the site of a brutal massacre in which American trained Salvadoran soldiers slaughtered almost a thousand civilians. This massacre happened at a very tense point in the Cold War, when the United States was fighting against Communism and the Soviet Union. In this particular situation, the United States aligned with the Salvadorans to prevent the spread of communism into El Salvador. When the Salvadoran soldiers killed hundreds of innocent citizens, the United States government became worried. Mark Danner, the author of The Massacre at El Mozote, stated that when news of the massacre entered the American media, the government brushed it off as propaganda. Ronald Reagan, the U.S. president at that time, and his administration responded to the situations in El Mozote by calling it propaganda because they feared America’s reputation would be tarnished, and the government wanted and needed to do everything in its power to avoid losing El Salvador to communism.

As our discussion post provided this week, the colonists responded with rebellion because of the new acts that were imposed upon them by the British (Schultz, K., 2013). Their attempt to reform the American colonies contributed to the growth of the Revolutionary movement because the British tried to enforce stricter policies and laws (Schultz, K. M., 2013). The British wanted to tighten the policies over the colonial officials so that it would reduce the corruption, the British wanted control over the area of land that the settlers occupied, and they wanted to raise revenue by taxing goods. Although the British were adamant about their purpose, the colonist believed that rebelling against them would help in receiving their independence.

On the other hand, neither did the people of France. Instead, the bourgeois's grained position and power, therefore causing more chaos. Robespierre, and many other dictators had attempted to overrun the government of France. In an attempt to get their ways, nothing went as planned resulting in many deaths and problems that were

You cannot talk about the Texas Rebellion without covering part of the Alamo. San Antonio had an important place in Texas. San Antonio had a very im portant part in the Texas Rebellion.On February Make your own on February 23rd 1836 after a grueling winter March General Antonio Lopez Santa Ana and his army arrived at San Antonio to put down the frontier Rebellion. The people crossed the san antonio river William Travis began writing about the “victory or death”. While the Alamo was under siege the provisional, the Texas government organized at Washington on March 2nd. The convention declared independence in the Republic of Texas was born at least on paper the almost the Convention the final attack came before Dawn on March 6th 1836 as Mexicans

America’s government is known for the strongest government as well as the strongest army. Somethings that might lead to rebellion with the citizens not feeling the sense of security . If americans feel like the government is using propaganda against them or terror tatics they are going to rebel. In the world police brutality is a major issue as well terrorist attacks known as isis. Some may call it a rebellion and others may call it a revolution. There is a thin line between rebellion and a revolution because some people have different motives. A rebellion is a act of violence against the government , a revolution is a non violent forcible overthrow of the government. If I were to choose to be apart of either one my decision would base off

Huguenots were French Protestants of the 1500s and 1600s. Henry IV, a Huguenot prince, took the throne in 1589. Ten years after he inherited the throne, he issued the Edict of Nantes to protect the Protestants. This gave the Huguenots religious toleration and other freedoms. Around 100,000 Huguenots fled France in 1685 due to Louis XIV revoking the Edict of Nantes because he saw it as a threat to religious and political unity. Most of them ended up in the Americas, Germany, Poland, and the Netherlands. Having the Huguenots flee was tough on the French economy because they were hardest workers of Louis’s subjects.

Every year my school, Veterans Memorial Early College High School, takes part in National History Day. National History Day is an annual event where students have the opportunity to showcase an important event that has happened in history relating to the theme given. This year’s theme is Taking a Stand in History. When I first started this project, my only intentions were to gain extra points in my World History AP class. However when I chose my topic, "The Boxer Rebellion", I quickly became engrossed in my research. It became so much more than extra points after I truly understood what I was representing . I won the Veterans Memorial History Fair and went on to the Brownsville Independent School District History Fair and placed 1st in the

Throughout the years many historians have compilated and examined why Indian people were so desperate to gain back their independence from the British Empire during their rule over India, from 1612 to 1947. The reasoning can most definitely be found as the British discriminated against Indian people as they believe that they were inferior; it is no surprise that Indian people fought so hard for their independence. Throughout the British Raj, they placed and put forward unbelievably racist acts and laws which discriminated against Indian people. Which of course led to Indians to rebel against the British rule and which the British reacted with causing massacres. Explaining the nationalistic many India’s felt during the British Raj.

Many nations across time and the world have experienced a revolution. From the American revolution to the French revolution, history has proven conflict can engage a nation at any moment. Tanter explains that two possible scenarios, changes in the economic development and the level of education are likely to cause revolutions (Tanter 264). A revolution can be composed of a group of individuals who are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice in exchange for change in the existing

Alexander the Great of Macedon died in 323 B.C.E., marking the beginnings of a great political transition both in the region of Palestine as well as the Macedonian Empire as a whole. While the nation of Israel experienced foreign dominance during the Persian period (538-322 B.C.E.), Alexander’s death brought a unique struggle for power in the region as his generals (the Diadochi) attempted to maintain control of the fragmented empire. Ptolemy I Soter, a Macedonian general who ruled in Egypt, defeated general Antigonus in 301 B.C.E, and as a result was given control of the region of Palestine at the agreement of the Diadochi. Nevertheless, conflict arose between Ptolemy I Soter and Seleucus I Nicator since the latter, a post-Alexander ruler of Syria, claimed the agreement between the Diadochi and Ptolemy regarding Palestine was void. A series of military conflicts were then waged over control of the Palestine region for the better part of a century, and yet the interior region was largely left unaffected, leaving Jerusalem to thrive both financially and politically under Ptolemaic rule.