The Case Against The Death Penalty

773 Words4 Pages
In the article "The Case Against the Death Penalty," which shows up in Crime and Criminals: Opposing Viewpoints, Eric Freedman contends that capital punishment does not discourage fierce crime as well as conflicts with decreasing the crime rate. This essay will analyse Freedman 's article from the perspectives of a working man, a needy individual, and a government official. Working man: A working man would in all probability agree with Freedman 's point of view with association with the monetary part of the death penalty because Freedman discusses about the amount more the death penalty costs than life confinement. The workingman would bewildered at how much the execution truly costs diverged from the measure of life confinement costs. The workingman would most likely ask why capital punishment is even looked for when life detainment appears to finish the same objective for considerably less cash. The working man would likewise concur with Freedman in light of the fact that the workingman would rather see his tax money spent on more profitable projects. The workingman would say that the administration taking such a large amount of his pay in assessments, it could accomplish something more beneficial than slaughtering individuals. A working man would presumably be irritated with the amount of cash is spent on simply death penalty cases. The workingman would be irritated because administration utilizing his cash to attempt these culprits, however it is utilizing a greater
Open Document