The Case: No Dogs Allowed Essay

- Your dog will be safe and this will give you peace of mind to know that your dog cannot get lost or cause harm to your neighbors.

According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.

For example from a study in 2013 it was reported that 65% of owners blammed the bad behavior on the dogs. When you let dogs off leashes out side of the dog park they could get into dog fights if they have never really be around another dog before,that is why Muscatine should build one so dogs can get use to being around other dogs. Also people getting bit could be pervented. When New York City started letting dogs off-leash dog-bite reports went from 40,000 to fewer than 4,000 per year.

While many residents are in support of the formation of the park, there are many people on the other side. Just ask Bill Theriault. He is worried that if Weston puts money to this dog park it will take money away for many

Opportunity costs of building this park would include less land for outdoor recreation or public recreation. The town is very limited on public spaces and land so creating the dog park would consume further parts of the land making even less of space for

Residents in the area will also have to deal with the exsive noise and unneeded trafic. With a dog park also comes barking. This means dogs barking and owners

In this large populated area, the on going noise of barking dogs and yelling owners can become a bit annoying. This is essential for those that enjoy the peace and quiet of their community. Therefore, building a dog park in a more isolated area, would be more ideal.

Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.

Public dog parks have proven to improve the health of the animals, decrease dog-related attacks, and increase the population in the surrounding area of the dog park. While concerns over the comfort of the surrounding residents comes into question, many of those issues may be resolved with appropriate laws set into place. For these reasons, I believe builing a public dog park would be a positive addition to the

We as a comunity have to deside if we can use a dog park. I live in Kalispell Montana and in my case we dont have a dog park. I believe that Kalispell does not need a dog park because of the population. In my exsperince we never needed a dog park we have many parks that you can take your dog to so he/she can run around. When my family and I got my blue nose pit he needed lots of room to rome and play. I took my dog named Spike on long walks, long boarding trips, and

I fully support the idea of building a dog park. As many cities have leash laws which keep the dogs from getting the excersize and socialization they need. When a dog does not get the space and socialization it needs, its behavior can waver. Dogs can become agressive as stated in the passage, "A Dog Park Benefits All". Therefore getting a dog park would keep dog related injuries on the lower end of the spectrum.

on the off chance that an accident does occur the dog park provides a controlled enviroment to make the accident less serious. with dog owners and trainers around, someone could notice if a dog is behaving strangely or in an aggresive manner. posted rules would also ensure owners are careful of their dogs and respect others within the park. in the worst case scenario a dog could be contained within the park until it could be dealt with in an appropriate manner.

The cost of installing this dog park would be astronimical. There would have to be adequate fencing as well as other equipment installed in order to make it functionable; all of this causing the price to rise higher and higher. I feel that this would be an unwise committment to make considering that there are much more vital issues that need to be

All though i do understand where some people dont want the dog park. The cost

Permitting all factors are accounted for, and the ratio of dog-owners to non-owning citizens is enough of a considerable amount, the installation of a dog park can be beneficial to any city. One should not let the cost scare them, for they can be quite the cost-saving