The Case Of Alfie And Peggy

In the riveting documentary Audrie & Daisy, husband and wife director team Bonnie Cohen and Jon Shenk retrace the events leading up to the harrowing sexual assaults of three teenage girls; Audrie Pott, Daisy Coleman, and Paige Parkhurst, and expose the agonizing after effects and exploitation of the assaults. Subsequent interviews with family members, friends and law enforcement officials give important details about the aftermath of the events, and introduce viewers to possibly the biggest villain of all, Sherriff Darren White of Maryville, Missouri. Throughout the documentary White appears smug when he states that “as County Sheriff, “the buck stops here” (White), and when asked about the crimes

Porter's "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall" depicts the story of a dying woman's life. Throughout her eighty years of life Mrs. Weatherall has had her fair share of disappointments, heartaches, and unfavorable outcomes. This short story is written in a manner that allows the reader to get an outside view looking in; similar to looking at the story through a window as if being acted out in front of you in the theater. The story is eloquently written and leaves the reader with a sense of familiarity towards the family. The populations of readers who have had the pleasure of experiencing this pathetic story have come to relate their own experiences and disappointments towards the story and have empathetic feelings towards the main

Not everyone’s life is filled with happiness. Granny Weatherall, in “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall,” by Katherine Anne Porter, and Addie Bundren, in “from As I Lay Dying ‘Darl’,” by William Faulkner, are two dying poor women who recall their lives in their minds when they are laying in beds. Their tough and harsh lives are similar in several ways. Granny Weatherall and Addie Bundren both had two men in their life. Granny loves her husband, John, and George.

The agreement did not include any personal property, but it did cover: " All buildings, plumbing, heating, lighting fixtures, storm sash, shades, blinds, awnings, shrubbery, and plants". The purchasers took possession on June 14, 1946, and discovered that certain articles which had been on the premises at the

• Whether the term fixture was defined in the sale agreement as items “affixed to land”.

To begin with, looking at the sandstone model we can then identify its status and ownership through its classification being established as either moveable or heritable. However, if the structure is held to be moveable in nature and subject to accession it would become the property of Lisa . The case of Zahnrad Fabrik Passau GmbH v Terex Ltd. When looking at cases surrounding moveable property, ‘diminution of efficiency’ may result as the test of accession . With this in mind, and applied to James’ case, the folly ‘rests on its own weight although the site had obviously been prepared for it’, it is further established that the folly is in one part, and needed to be removed by a crane to be replaced by a replica model due to ‘substantial damage’. It can be easily established that the folly has been in situ for a considerable amount of time and as illustrated in the case facts ‘The plot was very overgrown’ it was only after considerable landscaping

c. Only after conduct that shows the buyer 's willingness to become owner of the goods.

By contrast, in Lori Ann Nelson v Lynette Marie Bellamy, certain items were remaining on the land at completion date, the purchaser rescinded the contract by reason of the fact that there was a significant amount of rubbish and builder 's debris on the property. The court held that the items were present on the property at completion were not substantial, because such items did not impinge at all on the living areas, including the courtyard, and did not substantially prevent use of the undercroft or the side alleys which did not constitute a substantial part of the property.

In “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” by Katherine Anne Porter, we learn of an elderly woman who is lying on her death bed watching her life pass before her eyes. We learn, from these flashbacks, how much she has overcome and endured, and how she's put her whole heart into being a mother and wife up until her last breath, when she blew out the candle and rode with her Father in a cart to heaven. It’s this very reason why Porter, in my opinion, chose Granny as the narrator of this story; so we could see the story through her eyes, being able to relate and appreciate it better.

The Jilting of Granny Weatherall In Katherine Ann Porter’s "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall," there are two prevalant themes. The first is self-pity. The second theme is the acceptance of her immenent demise. Both deal with the way people perceive their deaths and mortality in general. Granny Weatherall’s behavior is Porter’s tool for making these themes visible to the reader. The theme of self-pity is obvious and throughly explored early on. As a young lady, Granny Weatherall left at the alter on her wedding day . As a result, the pathetic woman feels sorry for herself for the rest of her life. She becomes a bitter old woman who is suspicious of everyone around her. This point is shown early in the story when the

See Farias v. Vera, No. 13-09-00301, 2010 WL 24232096 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 17, 2010); Madison, 39 S.W.3d 604. Although Carter technically shared the land with Ron Stanton, the manner in which he had used the land, coupled with the fact that his usage of the land had indeed been observed by the subsequent purchase, rationally imposes a duty to inquire upon the subsequent purchaser where Farias and Madison had not. See Farias, 2010 WL 24232096; Madison, 39 S.W.3d 604. This key difference exists because Carter’s productive usage of the land implies that he possesses a “visible, open, exclusive, and unequivocal” right to the land; thereby triggering the subsequent purchaser’s duty to inquire. Storm 2007 WL 2204170 (citing Strong, 98 S.W.2d 346, 348-350). Conversely, the subjects of Farias and Madison, who are merely rentees, have insufficient basis to meet the aforementioned requirement which triggers the duty to inquire. See Farias, 2010 WL 24232096; Madison, 39 S.W.3d

In this short story of "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall" by Katherine Anne Porter, there is a powerful symbolic meaning through out the entire narrative. Although the symbols are not obvious in some paragraphs, they are in hidden text in others, which has to be, examined thoroughly by the reader. Granny is an eighty-year-old woman on her deathbed. She is in a state of confusion drifting in and out of consciences; she is reminiscing and blurring the past with the present. Although she comes to her senses every now and then, she is still perplexing some important details of her life. Through this story, all the symbols help define Granny's character, provide greater understanding of her life, and reinforces the important parts of

The organisation, Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd, claimed a dairy farm in New South Wales. The Husband, in his ability as executive of the organisation, exchanged title of the land to both himself and his wife as joint occupants in like manner. The spouse later moved his enthusiasm for the property to his wife for $1. An Application was brought by the organisation against the spouse and wife in the New South Wales Supreme Court looking for that the property be exchanged back to the organisation because of fraudulent activities of the spouse. The trial judge requested that the spouse pay remuneration to the organisation, however dismissed the procedures against the wife as she herself was not a knowing party to the fraud.

On the contrary, in Bruton court’s understanding of “exclusive possession” was a relative concept. Exclusive possession granted to Mr. Bruton was found based on the fact that he was not required to “share possession with the trust, the Council or anyone else”[13] and “the trust did not retain such control”[14]. Whether the grantor possesses title or not was held to be irrelevant. Nevertheless, since LQHT in fact could not exclude the true owner (i.e. the Council) from taking possession, the exclusive possession enjoyed by the “tenant” would be “only as against the grantor and not the rest of the world”[15] and practically dependent on the contractual relationship. This has received support from later cases applying Bruton. In Islington LBC v Green[16]with similar facts to Bruton, the tenant raised an argument that the

In the West London County Court proceeding were brought by Ghaidan. Judge Cowell granted a declaration that Godin-Mendoza did not succeed to the tenancy of the flat as the surviving spouse, but became entitled to an assured tenancy of the flat by succession as a member of the original tenant’s family.