The Case Of Pedigo V.

2162 Words9 Pages
In the case of Pedigo v. P.A.M. Transp., 891 F. Supp. 482, 485 (W.D. Ark. 1994), rev 'g, 60 F.3d 1300 (8th Cir. 1995), “The court advised that the ADA as it was being interpreted had the potential of being the greatest generator of litigation ever. Also, that the court doubted whether Congress, in its wildest dreams or wildest nightmares, intended to turn every garden-variety worker 's compensation claim into a federal case. Based on statistical data from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), from the time the Americans with Disabilities Act on July 26, 1992, enacted to FY 1996, 71,977 individuals had filed disability charges . From FY 1997 to FY 2015, 376,658 individuals had filed disability charges . Reviewing the…show more content…
It is also possible that plaintiff lawyers simply do not yet fully understand the legal requirements of the ADA. To the extent that cases lose because of the distinctive features of the ADA—like the reasonable accommodation requirement and the definition of disability. My analysis of appellate decisions under the ADA suggests that defendants are much more likely than plaintiffs to prevail in appellate litigation are . In a summary judgment case, a person with a qualifying disability is the first step, along with the threshold step for plaintiffs in making the prima facie case of discrimination requisite. There are two elements of the plaintiff’s prima facie case (in the absence of direct evidence of discrimination) are that the plaintiff was qualified for the position, with or without accommodations, and that the plaintiff experienced the adverse action as a result of disability . It is also, found that the elements of the prima facie case may be more difficult to dismiss on motions for summary judgment, as they likely involve disputed claims about the facts. In the empirical study by Beford in 2013 , one assumption is that the ADAAA will result in fewer summary judgment rulings finding that claimants lack standing as covered individuals with a disability. This study examines all reported federal court summary judgment decisions arising under Title I of the ADA for a forty-month period extending from
Open Document