The Case Of Samarco 2015 Mine Disaster

Because corporations are established to profit and shareholders invest money with expectations of a greater return, managers cannot be given a directive to be “socially responsible” without providing specific criteria of checks and balances to which needs to adhere. Therefore, it is imperative to the success of a corporation for managers to not act solely but rather to act within the policies of the shareholders.

or so many years our society has been thinking of forming new creative and innovative businesses, which would be more environmental and customer friendly. Nowadays a large number of different companies follow the social, ethical, as well as moral consequences when it comes to their decision making. One of the relatively new concepts involving economic and social concerns is Corporate Social Responsibility. Many of us apply this approach not only at work, but also in everyday life without even recognizing.

Firstly, I would like to explain what Corporate Social Responsibility is. “It is a company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and

The case study points out some of the deficiencies mentioned by Wilson in his article, specifically how political appointments lead to a weak administrative system and the tendency to corrupt the individual. Also due to the coal industry being so entwined with the state politics, the industry’s need for monetary gain came before the workers’ need for safety. Had there been a clear separation of politics and administration, it is feasible to believe that the incident at the mine could have been

There are conflicting expectations of the nature of a company’s responsibilities to society. However, those companies that undertake what may be termed ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ must decide; what are the actual social responsibilities of these companies? I will present a possible paradigm. Also, I will look at the benefit to the business that employs proper management as compared the business with poor management. This research paper describes my view of corporate social responsibility and compares the social responsibilities of Delta Air Lines and Spirit

Petrenko. A. Corporate social responsibility [Power Point Slides]. Retrieved from Lecture Notes Online Web site: https://moodle.yorku.ca/moodle/course/view.php?id=39261

In this paper I am going to discuss and explain my opinion on why a company Q is or is not socially responsible in the following areas company Q close a couple of stores in high crime areas, company Q started offering a very limited health conscious an organic products, company Q was approached by the local food bank for donations of day old food and company Q declined the donation request from the food bank and started throwing the food away, and company Q suspected possible fraud among its employees.

As the shareholder of Samarco, the disaster damaged BHP 's reputation and benefits. BHP needs to prepare huge funds for the clean-up bill, potential fines and compensation for those injured or killed people. In stock market, BHP took a beating in trade after the disaster. BHP fell 5.7 per cent in London and grappled with the lowest iron prices in a decade. The exact cause of the burst dam is unclear because the investigation is still continuing. However, a 2013 assessment by the independent Brazilian organisation highlighted concerns about the integrity of the tailings dam and recommended against renewing the licence which was ignored by Samarco (Ricardo, 2016). people have doubted that whether other tailings dams of BHP around the world is structurally sound and raised eyebrows about how they manage the risks at other operations. The disaster raised the suspicion of dependability of tailings dams at other mines owned by BHP. Besides, this disaster reminded people of past failures including the collapse of the BHP Ok Tedi tailings dam in the late of 20st century which is also considered as one of the worst environmental disaster (3). More and more people begin to criticize the operation way of BHP and lose the confidence for BHP due to their failure of diligence responsibilities. The following paragraph on this essay will discuss and analyze whether BHP’s behaviour is ethical or unethical through shareholder and stakeholder theories.

Research shows that disasters can have severe impact on the mental health of society, generating a variety of psychological and social issues. Understanding the emotional consequences of a disaster is just as critical to intervention strategies and improvement. Tragedies extend much deeper than the survivors and family members of victims, effecting the mental health of first responders, witnesses and people exposed to the mass media coverage concerning the event. Firstly, this essay looks at the sequence of events leading up to 2006 deadly Sago mine explosion in West Virginia; analyzing how and why this mine disaster occurred. Secondly, we will discuss the psychological impact on those directly and indirectly exposed to the disaster. These

Corporate Social Responsibility are actions taken by a corporation that have positive and lasting impact for all stakeholders associated with the organization, seeking to strike a balance between profits and helping to establish lasting investment in the community (Carrol, 2015). In the 1980’s, then President Reagan challenged the business community to take on more responsibility to address social problems (Carrol, 2015). Socially responsible actions can benefit local communities as well as the greater societal good.

In Brazil, too, “environmental problems gained new urgency”, and “authorities tried to cover up the disaster”. Moreover, Brazilian news coverage, resembling the Soviet one back when the Chernobyl disaster happened, are also attempting to suggest that the situation is not so awful. The dam disasters in Minas can also be compared to the Aral Sea (“[…] once one of the largest lakes in the world […] shrank to less than 10 percent of its original size, due to the aggressive Soviet construction […]”, and to Lake Baikal “[…] the largest fresh body of water, and once among the cleanest, suffered the construction of factories on its perimeter […]”. Regardless of whether those three incidents were intentional or not, it is clear that they only occurred thanks to

Social responsibility is built on a system of ethics, in which decisions and actions must be ethically validated before proceeding. If the action or decision causes harm to society or the environment then it would be considered to be socially irresponsible. Being socially responsible means that people and organization must behave ethically and sensitivity towards, social, cultural, economic, and environmental issues. Striving for social responsibility helps individuals, organization and government to have a positive impact on development, business and society. Often, the ethical implication of decision/action are overlooked for personal gain and the benefits are usually material. This frequently manifest itself in companies that

Corporate social responsibility has been one the key business buzz words of the 21st century. Consumers' discontent with the corporation has forced it to try and rectify its negative image by associating its name with good deeds. Social responsibility has become one of the corporation's most pressing issues, each company striving to outdo the next with its philanthropic image. People feel that the corporation has done great harm to both the environment and to society and that with all of its wealth and power, it should be leading the fight to save the Earth, to combat poverty and illness and etc. "Corporations are now expected to deliver the good, not just the goods; to pursue

The corporate social responsibility for Investcorp is to assess and take responsibility for the company 's effects on environmental and social well-being. Switzerland is one of the countries that holds companies responsible for environmental well-being. The Swiss government imposes their economic actors to assume their responsibilities towards society. This means that the government is reinforcing the position of Swiss enterprises in terms not only of their competitiveness but also with respects to the part they perform in

Corporate social responsibility is the voluntary stance or set of actions from a corporation that demonstrate a contribution to a better society and a cleaner environment. Corporations are already required to operate within the law, but laws do not always protect all people or individuals who will be affected by the corporation’s actions. In addition to this, it is very common for special interests to play a part in legal decisions through lobbying efforts, so it is assumed to be an additional effort for a corporation to be socially responsible. Being socially responsible essentially comes down to being considerate and calculated in the decision making process, paying attention to the consequence of every action. In the ethical decision making model, there are two particular steps that I believe to be of greater importance than the others. The first would be that of