The Case Of Stephens & Stephens V. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co

HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; Inez Grant; Morehouse Parish School Board; Horace Mann Insurance Company and Lloyd Gray, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

Did Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, LabOne, and Dr. J. Alexander Lowden have a duty to inform Gary and Renna Pehle that they were HIV-positive?

The defendant Sage Rent-A-Car leased a vehicle to defendant Jeffery Calkin. However, Mr. Calkin failed to stop at a stop sign, and collided with the plaintiff Jane White. The plaintiff then filed a suit against both defendants due to failure to carry insurance under the New Mexico Mandatory Financial Responsibility Act. Nevertheless, when the defendant Sage Rent-A-Car incorporated, it filed for a surety bond with the superintendent of insurance and is self-insured under

Our client, Sage Rent-A-Car Incorporation, leased a vehicle to Jeffery Calkin. The Defendant, Mr. Calkin was involved in a collision by failing to stop at a stop sign, therefore colliding with Jane White, the Plaintiff. Ms. White filed a negligence law suit against Mr. Calkin and Sage Rent-A-Car Inc. In the complaint, the Plaintiff claims that our client is required to carry insurance under the provisions of the Mandatory Financial Responsibility Act and therefore, has the duty to assume liability for the Defendant’s negligent collision. This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss the Plaintiff’s complaint.

2) Repair Theory – Damages should put things in the state that they were specified in the contract (IE fix the land as per the contract)

The insureds, who live in a separate house on the same property, refute all of the plaintiffs’ allegations with the exception of their concession that a portion of the siding is missing from one of the exterior walls. They explained that during the renovation of the house, which was completed approximately one year before the plaintiffs took possession, they had a window removed from

Police involvement was necessary since security was unable to assist that night; security services are complementary since the guard must service all three of Ms. Miner’s complexes, thus encouraging the use of police with emergency situations. Ms. Miner was uneasy when she learned about the assault and personally emailed the Plaintiff to inquire about her condition and to clarify that damages to the unit be repaired. Yet, Plaintiff responded by placing the blame on her ex-boyfriend for the damage, claiming that he wasn’t a guest (Exhibit 7); nonetheless, Plaintiff reluctantly paid $2500 for repair costs

The party crashers started quarrel with the guests and the defendant chased everyone out where the crashers open fired on the guests and left. The plaintiffs (three guests) had sustained injuries and wanted compensation for it. Two were injured from gunshots and one was not able to get the affection and love that her husband gave her in the same way.

The costs associated with the litigation filed by Beth Smiles Company against the denial of the insurance claim settlement of the death of her business partner due to accident which made the company eligible to a double indemnification went through the roof because of the number of depositions made by the lawyers of the insurance company. This was done to pressurize the small company like Environ- vision to give up the litigation and accept the offer of $100,000 initially made to the company. Moreover, since, the company Environ- vision was the plaintiff it had to show substantial proof that the death of its partner was accidental while the insurance company had to proof that it was suicide committed by the man in order to avoid a claim of

Plaintiff, Ronald Hall alleges that on June 3, 2013 at approximately 11:00 a.m., he sustained injuries to his left leg when he stepped on an unsecured water meter pit located in the tree space in the 3500 block of Stanton Road, S.E. Plaintiff alleges that his medical/health care expenses total $17,103.45. Plaintiff stated that prior to the incident, he had traveled this area, and did not experience or notice any problems with the water meter cover; that the meter pit at issue was covered; nobody told him, nor did he hear that there was a problem with a water meter cover on this street. Plaintiff testified during his deposition that prior to stepping on the cover, it [cover] looked “normal.” Further, Plaintiff also testified that he did not

Three Situations When You Need to Consult with an Attorney About a Fire Insurance Claim

"[a]n insurance company has a duty to act in good faith in settling claims and a breach of that duty will give rise to a cause of action by the insured." Pasipanki v. Morton, 61 Ohio App. 3d 184, 185, 572 N.E.2d 234 (1990) (quoting Bean v. Metro. Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co., 9th Dist. No. 13543, 1988 Ohio App. LEXIS 4275, 1988 WL 114464 at *1 (Oct. 26, 1988)). Gekko did not act in good faith to settle Vic’s claim against Donna, and their failure to do so enables Donna has a cause of action against Gekko.

I believe that Metropolitan Life Insurance Company wins. Because the Supreme held that the Alabama statute that taxed foreign out-of-state insurance companies at a higher rate than domestic insurance companies violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Also, the Supreme Court found that Alabama’s goal was very innocently and totally prejudiced. Since it was designed only to favor domestic industry within the state, at no cost to foreign corporations also finding to do business in the state. The court mentioned “the Alabama domestic preference tax gives the 'home team' an advantage by burdening all foreign corporations seeking to do business within the state.” (High Court Overturns Alabama Tax

The plaintiff received $7,500 (in 1990) for a one-year interference with her enjoyment of her unit, 10,000 for loss of value of plaintiff's suite, and $8,057 for real estate commission on the sale of the suite and for moving expenses. When assessing these damages the court stated at para. 55.

If the home is considered a total loss, the insurance company may reimburse the owner for its current market value. If most of the possessions were destroyed in the fire, it is likely that the insurance company offerse a market-value compensation for each item. For example, if a policy insures a home for $350,000, the contents are usually covered for at least 50-70% of the insured amount or $175,000. Many policies limit how much they pay for items such as a luxury painting, a diamond ring or a fur coat.