The Causes of Subprime Mortgage Financial Crisis Essay

The mortgage crisis of 2007 marked catastrophe for millions of homeowners who suffered from foreclosure and short sales. Most of the problems involving the foreclosing of families’ homes could boil down to risky borrowing and lending. Lenders were pushed to ensure families would be eligible for a loan, when in previous years the same families would have been deemed too high-risk to obtain any kind of loan. With the increase in high-risk families obtaining loans, there was a huge increase in home buyers and subsequently a rapid increase in home prices. As a result, prices peaked and then began falling just as fast as they rose. Soon after families began to default on their mortgages forcing them either into foreclosure or short sales. Who was to blame for the risky lending and borrowing that caused the mortgage meltdown? Many might blame the company Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but in reality the entire system of buying and selling and free market failed home owners and the housing economy.

In the movie the big short, Lewis Ranieri, who is a banker of the Wall Street, created an idea that companies packed thousands of mortgage all bundled together to sell, which is the AAA credit-rating bond, and can obtain high yields with low risk because everyone should pay for their mortgage. The concept of Lewis Ranieri is called mortgage-backed securities (MBS). However, the demand of buying MBS is more than MBS supply. Therefore, when the risk of MBS is high, Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) is a way to change subprime loans to high- rating bonds and it can be sold again. Although CDO is full of subprime loans, it still can get AAA rating because

The world’s financial system was almost brought down in 2008 by the collapse of Lehman Brothers that was a major international investment bank at that time. The government sponsored these banks’ bailouts that were funded by tax money in order to restore the industry. Before the crisis, banks were lending irresponsible mortgages to subprime borrowers who had poor credit histories. These mortgages were purchased by banks and packaged into low-risk securities known as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). CDOs were divided into tranches by its default risk. The ratings of those risks were determined by rating agencies such as Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. However, those agencies were paid by banks and created an environment in which agencies were being generous to ratings since banks were their major clients.

The private label mortgage securitization collected a series of assets – most of them are high-yield junk bonds, mortgage securities, credit-default swap with varying degrees of risk. The securitization of subprime mortgages was attractive to investors due to high interest rates and high return features. More and more financial institutions started to sell private label mortgage securitization, including banks, insurance companies and so on. In 2006, the CDO market ranged from $0.5 trillion to $2 trillion (boundless. Com). Also, by 2007, about 70% of subprime borrowers used hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs).

The recent mortgage crisis in the US was unprecedented. It led to a massive clampdown of financial institutions, occasioning one of the worst financial melt-downs the US has ever faced (Jaffe, 2008). Quite naturally, it would be necessary to examine the cause of the crisis in order to draft prophylactic measures that would prevent the same financial disaster in the future. This paper will discuss the events that led to the mortgage crisis.

Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) explains the old system of lending and the new securitization process. Matt Demon narrates how the home buyers repaid their loans to lenders, and consequently, the lenders sold the loans to the investment banks which combined the mortgage loans with other credit loans creating a collateral debt obligation a complex derivative. The collateral debt obligation sold to investors who paid the rating agency to evaluate the CDO's. The home buyers were now paying investors through this

Investors relished in these mortgage backed securities. They paid a higher rate of return than investors could get in other places, and appeared to be safe bets. Home prices increased; Leading lenders to believe the worst case scenario, homeowners would default on their mortgage, and they could sell the house for an additional amount of money. 1 At the same time, credit rating agencies continued to inform investors that mortgage backed-securities were safe investments. Investors were desperate to gain more securities. Promoting lenders to help create more of them. However, to create more, lenders needed more mortgages. This caused lenders to loosen their standards and provided loans to individuals with low income and poor credit. These are referred to as subprime mortgages.2 Eventually, some institutions begin using what is referred to as predatory ending practices to generate mortgages. They made loans without verifying income and offered absurd, adjustable rate mortgages with payments individuals could afford, at first, it became disorderly quickly. Subprime leading was a new practice at the time. These investments were becoming increasingly less safe. However, investors trusted rating, and continued to

Inflation of real estate appraisals also added to more reckless lending. Each of these factors contributed to the plethora of homeowners who could not afford their houses and pay their mortgages. If the idea of subprime lending had remained pure, this financial tool could have helped many people change their lives for the better. However, businesses were careless and greedy enough to lend to increasingly risky clients, which ended up harming their businesses, their clients, and eventually the entire economy.

A CDO is created when mortgage loans are grouped together, divided by risk, and sold to investors from the banks that hold them. The banks, when doing so, pass the risk of a loan defaulting onto the investor. However, they do not make as much money on the loan, as the investor has to make their profit as well (Kiviat 30). These CDO’s initially appeared as a sound investment, but when the demand for CDO’s exceeded supply for investment, artificial CDOs were created by dividing up other CDOs. This allowed people to be deceitful of the quality of their investments. Investments are rated on a scale from AAA to A and BBB to B, with AAA being the least risky, and B being the most. What these artificial CDOs did was carefully chop up grade BBB or even grade BB legitimate CDOs and repackaged as AAA investments even though they contained things like subprime mortgages and no documentation loans in the mix (Kiviat 30). Because some holding groups invested heavily in CDOs, losses in the subprime market caused hedge funds to become nearly worthless. One of the hardest hit companies was BearStearns, who had two hedge funds go from over $1.5 billion to practically nothing (Kiviat 30).The artificial CDOs created by greed on Wall St. has also caused international banks, like BNP Paribas SA, France’s biggest bank to freeze funds because the bank couldn’t “ ‘fairly’ value their holdings after

Did you know that you can take up to 30 years to pay off a mortgage in Canada?

In the new system, an investment banker buys the mortgage from the lender, borrowing millions of dollars to buy thousands of mortgages, and every month he gets payments from homeowners for each of the mortgages. The banker then consolidates all the mortgages and splits the final product into three sections: safe, okay, and risky mortgages, which make up a collateralized debt obligation (CDO). As homeowners pay their mortgages, money flows into each of the sections, with the safe filling first and the risky filling last, contributing to their respective names. Credit agencies stamp the top two safer mortgages with a triple A or triple B rating, which are then be sold to investors who want a safe mortgage, while the risky slice is sold to hedge funds who want a risky investment. The bankers make millions, pay back their loans, and investors also make a worthwhile investment. So pleased are the investors, however, that they want more. Unfortunately, back at the beginning of the cycle, the mortgage broker can no longer find qualified mortgagers

One of the first indications of the late 2000 financial crisis that led to downward spiral known as the “Recession” was the subprime mortgages; known as the “mortgage mess”. A few years earlier the substantial boom of the housing market led to the uprising of mortgage loans. Because interest rates were low, investors took advantage of the low rates to buy homes that they could in return ‘flip’ (reselling) and homeowners bought homes that they typically wouldn’t have been able to afford. High interest rates usually keep people from borrowing money because it limits the amount available to use for an investment. But the creation of the subprime mortgage

Housing prices in the United States rose steadily after the World War II. Although some research indicated that the financial crisis started in the US housing market, the main cause of the financial crisis between 2007 and 2009 was actually the combination of housing bubble and credit boom. The banks created so much loan that pushed the housing price to the peak. As the bank lend out a huge amount of money, the level of individual debt also rose along with the housing price. Since the debt rose faster than people’s income, people were unable to repay their loan and bank found themselves were in danger. As this showed a signal for people, people withdrew money from the banks they considered as “safe” before, and increased the “haircuts” on repos and difficulties experienced by commercial paper issuers. This caused the short term funding market in the shadow banking system appeared a

In relation to the increase in house’s price, the rise of financial agreements such as mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO) encouraged investors to invest in the U.S housing market (Krugman, 2009). When housing price declined in the U.S, many financial institutions that borrowed and invested in subprime mortgage reported losses. In addition, the fall of housing price resulted in default and foreclosure and that began to exhaust consumer’s wealth and

Collateralised Debt Obligations, short for CDOs, is an important part of asset securitisation. CDOs provided more liquidity in the economy which was a popular financial innovation. It is an innovative financial product that repackages different debts into a new portfolio. In CDOs, investment bank gathered a series of assets from the fixed-income market, such as mortgage-backed securities, credit-default swaps, and high-yield bonds. Once the CDO has created by the investment bank, it would distribute the cash flows from those mentioned assets to investors in the CDO. CDOs pool all the cash flows from its collection of assets together and divided into rated tranches or slices, in order to satisfy the needs of different risk preferences of investors. Suppose there are three basic tranches, safe, good enough and risky. When money comes in, the top one will be filled in first. It