The Center Party Analysis

As a representative of the proud state of Efra, Napoli, I was tasked with balancing my loyalties to my party, state, and personal conscience. Along with myself, there was one other member of the Napoli Conservative Party and one member of the Napoli Liberal Party. The state of Efra was divided over liberal and conservative policies. This, coupled with the more moderate/middle stance of all representatives (with obvious right and left leanings), made for a unique environment for discussion.

Former President Theodore Roosevelt unhappy with his handpicked successor , President Taft’s approach to trust busting, chose to run against him for the Presidency. When he didn’t receive the Republican Party nomination, he ran as the first (and last) candidate for the Progressive Party, nicknaming it after himself, the Bull Moose party. His proposed platform, New Nationalism, laid out very progressive goals, that were much more progressive than any of his ideas while in the White House. It dealt with organized labor, child labor laws, workmans compensation, safety standards, work week hours, and inheritance tax. The New Nationalism also

The first topic that I have based my party preference on was the political party’s stances on foreign aid. The democratic views on foreign aid policies are that the U.S. should raise the budget to support the more disadvantaged countries to further repair the gap between the wealthy and impoverished. On the other hand, Republicans are more concerned about the U.S., and only see helping others as an alternative in keeping the peace. I believe that in order to keep bonds and have strong connections with other leaders, especially through trade, the budget needs to either stay the same or increase. In situations like the invasion of our country,

The dangers of “bothsideism” in which pundits tries to equate two opposing sides of an issue has caused havoc on the American public. Its detrimental effects has affected the livelihood of countless Americans and since the 1970s American politics has been on a downward slope. It is no mere coincidence that it coincides with the rise of the American right, the Republicans. Once proudly championed as the party of Lincoln is no more as its shameless gimmicks, vindictive leaders and the belief that the greater good of the party is greater than the nation succinctly describes current Republicans. Their tactics succeeded but it came at a devastating cost; its end result, the undermining public belief in the American government. Although, the general

The next set of models changes the dependent variable to national party strength. There has long been a disagreement over the manner of the shift in party strength. Some have argued that the realignment of southern politics started with a top down approach. Others argue that the realignment was fueled by success down ballot, which led to ambitious Republican politicians seeking and finding success higher up the ballot. Besides the change in the dependent variable, there is also a change to models 4 and 5 by adding the state party index to the model. This will allow a test of the top down/bottom up question on the southern realignment. Because of the controversy relating to this topic, any significant finding will assist in explaining this important

Sweeping into 17th century, the Great Britain and France had always endlessly been in war, marked as well as secured the region on the map of North America. After the Great Britain chased out France from Canada as the Great Britain did not want France to step a foot in its region. Soon after, France has moved its colonies to New Orleans in the South to a place named the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes region, which was generally has been populated with Indian as they were shrouding from the war of both great powerful country; there came the France who wanted to expand its power, took the Great Lakes and started to govern the region. Which eventually leads to the immergence of middle ground. In a sense, the

I really enjoyed reading your post because it clarifies what I stated in mine. As you said above, the Republicans are more towards the whole, rather than the Democrats that are toward to the each one of us. I kind of see the slight difference between the two parties but what also surprised me is that they have a lot of similarities, in which sometimes it feels like that they believe in the same thing.

I found an interesting article from just prior to the election on MSNBC that gave scenarios which so many Americans believed possible about the future of leadership in both parties. Had the Republicans lost their strong hold that they now possess the leadership of the Republican Party would have acknowledge that they played a key part in losing the election and the house, “he (Trump) would expect party officials and GOP leaders to pay the price for his failure”. The lack of unity and the failure of the Republican leadership during the campaign showed how torn they are as a party with the current political situation. We as citizens have much more impact on our local government than on the national politics of our country. If we want to create

In this world there are two world wide recognized political parties, which are the Democrats,and the Republicans. Each political party has their own party platforms on several issues. We as a nation divide into groups,and start choosing which side we are on, whether if its in the Democrats, or Republicans side. Why do we divide into groups? Well the answer easy it is because our views differentiate from others, and that is why we tend to go with the political party that has the same views as us. In this essay I will be discussing about abortion, education, and family,and children issues that both the Republicans, and Democrats agree,and

There is a very diverse current state of representation in American politics as of today. One group that represents the Republican Party is the Christian Coalition. They remain an important player in GOP politics and they often act like an interest group for the Republican Party (Clifton, 2004). There are three perspectives that explain how a group influences a representation of a party. The first is electoral mobilization. This argues that social movement organizations will secure influence with legislators to assure them that their supporters will turn out to vote for them on election day (Clifton, 2004). The second is financial clout and it shows that donating money to members of Congress will be an attempt to shape of how policy will be

Modern day political scientists have noted that America’s current Congress, the 114th is the most polarized ideologically in history meaning the Democrat make up is more liberal and the Republican make up is more conservative than ever before. This ultimately leave very little room in between for agreement thus essentially slowly fading away the congressional center where moderate outlook exists to tie the two sides of the aisle together. It is commonly acknowledged that the system has become extensively polarized and is often referred to as broken as a result. Given this fact, it is imperative to examine just how America’s political system has so rapidly evolved and what those who came before us had to say about the concept of a two party

In the United States of America there is a plethora of extravagant political parties with which one can associate. Obviously, due to the nature of the scholarship at hand, the reader of this written work is a Republican. Is there any thought ever given to the immensity of the political spectrum? There is left and right, up and down, libertarians, authoritarians, liberals, conservatives, socialists, communists, neo-libertarians, paleoconservatives, fascists, or one could be completely neutral. Still, no matter how hard we try to avoid it, in the United States of America, one is always drawn to one side, left or right, while little attention is ever given to the north or south poles of the spectrum. Association with a political party is something

During the early 1900’s thousands of immigrants traveled to America in hopes of improving their lives as well as their families’ lives. These immigrants were in search of opportunities which would allow them to pursue their dreams. While it was an extensive and risky trip to travel to America, the reward of political freedom outnumbered the risks associated with this voyage. After arriving in America these immigrants adjusted to their new life, opened businesses and settled into their new lifestyle. They did this as they worked to achieve the “American Dream.” These immigrants did not have a simple lifestyle but were forced to work hard in order to meet their needs as well as enjoy the luxuries that their new life had to offer. These immigrants

According to a 2015 study by the Pew Research Center, 81% of Americans have distrust for the government, 74% believe elected officials put their own interests first, and 65% harbor distrust for Republicans and Democrats. (Fingerhut). In spite of these numbers, main party candidates continue to be elected into office. Americans cannot vote third party for fear of a wasted vote, or literally cannot vote third party due to the historically unfair standards third parties must meet to gain ballot access. There currently are third parties in the US but with the US’s system of voting, no third party can rise to the same level of the Democrats or Republicans. Historically, the US has had several third parties run successful campaigns, but in modern

Many people, including the United States, thinks the US is the greatest democracy; but many other countries question whether they are or not because the US democracy only tolerates two political parties. In the 2014 presidential election, there were 52 political parties that ran during the election. Some examples of the main stream parties were the Libertarians, Green, Constitution, and Reform Parties (Tormsen, 2015). Other parties included the Blue Enigma, Marijuana, NSA Did 911, etc. Although there are many parties that ran during the election, everyone knows that only one of two parties will win: Democrats or Republicans (Tormsen, 2015). The only third party that ever won in American history was Abraham Lincoln in 1860, when he defeated the Democrats and Whigs. Many people do not support third parties because they take votes away from a candidate that has the chance of winning (Mill, 73), which is what happened during this presidential election. Many problems rise with third parties because votes that should be going to parties that have a chance of winning, or taken from them and given to groups who have no chance. There are economic barriers because third parties don’t receive government funding, so any money they need must be fundraised. Another problem is that third parties usually only stand for one thing. Because their vision is so focused or narrowed on one thing, it prevents them from focusing on other issues that the nation needs to address.