The Five Innovation Building Blocks

Innovations form the main sources of competitive advantages and are always of significance for the growth of a company. Companies or organizations put their greater efforts in improving their performance by finding new ideas and knowledge on the best way of beating their competitors and therefore give satisfaction to their customers. There are various factors involved in the innovation design system which can be either internal or external.

The improvement effort may involve the whole business or a specific process in manufacturing, service, or office work. Most successful firms have become adept at making small, continuous improvements to their business processes as an on-going activity for every employee. It

Innovation has been a topic that has dominated the main conversation across many organizations. How can governments reshape their role and redesign the existing systems they have and renew the benefits from the creation and development of individual processes. The recession of 2008 has created opportunities and has demanded things be done differently. Gone are the times when problems are solved with endless resources and labor to work their way to a solution. The energy has been refocused to determine the best solution to the different array of issues facing any organization. The national debate has begun to reveal strategies that have reiterations of the most prominent theories and suggestions related to problem solving and a devotion to avoiding crisis. Municipality’s revenues have diminished, leadership and experienced workers have retired, and the push to change and progress is paramount, while assets and resources have been cut or are nonexistent. The key phrase of “doing more with less” has been engrained in every employee in the public sector who was fortunate enough to of avoiding the painful reduction in force policies that have contributed to the demise of the communities. These organizations have been cut deep and are left with employees that faced lost wages, decreasing financial securities and trust that represents the culture and values of these organizations. The changes necessary to reverse the demise of these organization demands collaboration and a change

Carr sees that while innovation keeps manufactured data pushing ahead and enormous measures of data available to us, it likewise influences our normal capacity to have an independent perspective. He is speaking to poignancy since he detects that this basic issue is making our general public less needy with their selves and more needy towards innovation. He utilizes his article to speak to the way that he sees the adjustments in the ways that he used to think originated from the utilization of innovation. Cascio, then again, imagines that innovation is the thing that makes our general public so effective. He utilizes ethos to suggest that the idea of co-development amongst human and innovative cooperation has helped us adjust to the constantly changing world around us. Carr's and Cascio's viewpoints toward the impacts of innovation utilization are the beginning stage of differentiation between the two

According to Jane Fountain, e-government or the governing with the use of technology has changed bureaucracy reform. She looks at the changes over the course of two presidencies one the Clinton Administration in the 1990’s and the other the Bush Administration in the 2000’s, as well as the state level.

Further methods of keeping readers attached to the paper included the introduction of the two hotlines that served to the queries of readers.

Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee. (2005). In support of innovation management and Roger's Innovation Diffusion theory. Vol: 22 iss: 3 pg: 411 -422, Government information quarterly

The Breakthrough Innovation Framework, or BrinnovationTM, incorporates Kotter’s Leading Change model, while emphasizing a framework of innovation (Gupta, 2011). The Brinnovation framework accentuates the abilities and talents of those in the system, with its success depending on a change in the organization’s culture to embrace innovation (Gupta, 2011). The leadership can achieve a transformation in organizational thinking by applying Kotter’s eight-step plan, focusing on creativity (Gupta, 2011).

Though business-like mechanisms can create a more efficient and potentially innovated government, government and business should be run differently, since they are inherently different in their conceptual values. Appleby explains some of these differences. He argues that no one can serve the public as it should be served unless he or she has a public-interest attitude with certain special characteristics. In addition, business has much narrower extent, while public officials are more broadly stimulated, with a breadth of view and a public-interest attitude. Government is complex as well as vastly interdependent with many other nonprofit and private organizations. Also, the government is subject to public scrutiny and public outcry. According to Denhardt and Denhardt, government acts, in concert with private and nonprofit groups and organizations, to seek solutions to the problems that communities face. In the process, the role of government is transformed from one of controlling to one of agenda setting, bringing the proper players to the table, facilitating, negotiating, or brokering solutions to public problems—often through coalitions of public, private, and nonprofit agencies. Finally, government is different from business

However, the process of innovation is closely linked to the understanding of innovation – whether it is an act of bringing changes or consequence of an action which represents changes. It is easily understandable that any particular action does not ensure the same outcome but may bring changes, and all changes are not considered innovation. So, it is imperative to develop a clear understanding of the concept for proposing a generalized process of innovation.

Considerable research has established the importance of spreading innovative ideas to bring about change. While Damanpour, Walker, and Avellaneda (2009) write that “the study of innovation hardly needs justification as scholars, policy makers, business executives, and public administrators maintain that innovation is a primary source of economic growth, industrial change, competitive advantage, and public service” (p. 650), it is misleading to suggest that there is a consensus in scholarly research on the use of the diffusion of innovations framework. In essence, diffusion is the process where adopters (individuals or organizations) make choices on whether to embrace an innovation by examining the uncertain benefits and risks of this new

Innovation is the process by which ideas are created, selected and implemented to bring about profitable change to organisations. Innovations come as a result of an identified need for organisations to change their current processes, activities or operations. Andriopoulos and Dawson (2009) explain that organisational change is ‘new ways of organizing and working’. They explain that change occur in two dimensions – movement of state and scope of change.

There is the need to stress improving organizational and processing procedures. This can be done by the use of technology such as e-gov and management information systems. Also, computer and software applications can make a difference in large education systems, unemployment compensation, retraining, welfare-to-work, and monitoring capital construction programs. The importance to maintain and improve productivity of our government programs. It is very important that we improve productivity of government programs. In this economy we need to be able to cut costs wherever possible, this enables us to do so. It also would limit the amount of involvement and confusion it would bring if we don't improve them. The efficiency as we improve will also be developed.

Companies live and breathe innovation; or, at the terribly least, notice it basic to their success. Such companies are those that others ought to emulate for they recognize that to do business, as Peter Drucker prompt in an exceedingly recent Harvard Business review article, “Every firm—not simply businesses—needs one core competence: innovation.”

Process improvement is a fundamental to business management.  If you run an operation (and all businesses do, one way or another) you are reliant on two things: