The Civil Right Act Of 1964

1072 Words5 Pages
1. What were the legal issues in this case?
Dunlop sued Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) under the Title VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964, and both under the Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact. Dunlap feels that he has been discriminated during the interview process. The district court concluded that TVAs subjective hiring process permitted racial bias against the plaintiff and other black job applicants. Tennessee Valley Authorities was found guilty of discrimination against the plaintiff.
The Title Vii of the Civil Right Act of 1964 enforces the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injective relief against discrimination in public accommodations to authorized the attorney general to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extent he Commission on Civil Rights to prevent discrimination in federal assisted programs, to established a Commission on Equal Employment, and for other purposes .Under this law, sec 2000e [Section 701e], the plaintiff is being protected against discrimination act. A labor organization should deemed to be engages in an industry affect commerce.it maintains or operates a hiring hall or office which procures employees opportunities to work for an employee (https://www.eeoc.gov/law/status.titlevii.cfm).
Dunlop feels that the interview has been manipulated to select lower qualified candidates with favoritism toward family

More about The Civil Right Act Of 1964

Get Access