The Class Struggles of 18th and 19th Centuries in Europe Essay

According to Marx and the Communist Manifesto, history is the rich battling with the poor, also history has always been a history of class struggle. The Communist Manifesto calls for equality among all classes, therefore there would be no classes. Workers are paid different salaries according to the quality and the training of their work. "Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes, directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat."[iii] As Marx’s states here, he feels that society is splitting more and more in to classes, which is feels is wrong. He thinks that society should be one and everyone should belong to one class. Marx did not deny the close connection between personal freedom and property rights. "In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."[iv] Marx thought that the role of every individual was for everyone to be a worker and to make an equal amount of money as everyone else. Marx even stated that having a capitalist society would therefore make that society fall, all because of the ongoing struggle between the rich and the poor. The Communist Manifesto states that communism would change a person’s role in life from being decided on the basis

The bourgeoisie dominated over many parts of society and karl marx and friedrich engels were equally very worried about this and began to addressed these issues, in the communist manifesto and they also felt the need to include how workers were being forced to have to work in such horrible condition also seeing how their working conditions would affect the workers. Karl marx as some kind of show and how between them people who were oppressed were standing up and fighting the people who were oppressing them. It was mostly based on how the bourgeoisie had almost full control over the proletariats people's lives.him seeing how the work that most of the work the proletariats work they would do would only just pay off the bourgeoisie with all

Marx begins by writing, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. (Jones, 219)” The existing society was divided between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat, as I stated before. The Bourgeoisie consisted of the social class who owns the means of production. The Proletariat consisted of wage-laborers who have no means of production of their own and they are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live (Jones 219). As you can see the bourgeoisie had the upper hand because they were the people who were mainly in charge of the proletariat. Marx believed that the

     Marx describes the problem in great detail in the first chapter. He feels there is a problem between the bourgeoisie and the proletarians. The bourgeoisie were the oppressed class before the French Revolution and he argues that they are now the oppressors. The proletarians are the new working class, which works in the large factory and industries. He says that through mass industry they have sacrificed everything from the old way of religion, employment, to a man’s self worth and replaced it with monetary value. He is mad that the people of ole that use to be upper class such as skills man, trades people, & shopkeepers, are now slipping into the proletarians or working class. He

"We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of production and of exchange." (Marx, 424). In this sense, the bourgeoisie have the ability to change since they themselves are products of revolutions. In other terms, the bourgeoisie are an always changing class that has found ways to stay in power through political hegemony over the proletariat class. Marx conjures the proper preconditions for a successful rebellion but again contradicts himself through his own ideologies. Although Marx believes that capitalism will be responsible for the proletariat rebellion it is the same system that will estrange man from each other and thus prevent a successful revolt.

Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto was most appealing to and revolutionary for the industrial workers of 1848 (and those to come after that time). The call for unification of the proletariat and abolishment of the Bourgeoisie was an urgent one during a time of rapid progress in all aspects of industrial life. This urgency of The Communist Manifesto and the desire for change of political ideologies (to match the exponential rate of progress of wealth and industry) created not only a spate of revolutions, but a long lasting change in political ideas for industrialized European nations. The Communist Manifesto created a sense of unity and class awareness throughout the

The Communist Manifesto, originally drafted as, “Manifesto of the Communist Party”, is a pamphlet written by Karl Marx, that in essence reflects an attempt to explain the goals and objectives of Communism, while also explaining the concrete theories about the nature of society in relation to the political ideology. The Communist Manifesto breaks down the relationship of socio-economic classes and specifically identifies the friction between those classes. Karl Marx essentially presents a well analyzed understanding of class struggles and the issues concerning capitalism, the means and modes of production and how those means affect the classes as a whole.

This class has not waivered from that principle and has become in itself an almost limitless superpower by capturing first mans institution of government and then man himself. As Marx states “…the bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry and of the world-market, conquered for itself, in the modern representative State, exclusive political sway. The executive of the modern State is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.”(475) and “It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors” and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous cash payment.”(475) The bourgeoisie grasp has also reached such a length that it can access the worldwide pool of resources and commodities of which include the proletariat himself. This grasp has not only been able to perpetuate the oppression by keeping the wages of laborers at a continually degrading standard, but it has also been able to distract the proletariat from the source of the problem through the competition that corresponds with the decreasing wage. After offering this encouraging

During the Industrial Revolution the population was broken up into two classes; the minority was the rich, industrial middle class, the bourgeoisie, and the majority was the poor working class, the proletariat. The bourgeoisie believed in their rights to gain wealth and preserve individuality and in their duty to maintain these rights, which in turn determined the harsh laboring and living conditions of the working class. The indignities forced upon the lower class also caused movements that challenged the bourgeoisie to alter their beliefs. These included the creation of Communism, the Christian Socialist Movement, utopian

Due to the fact the proletariats or the “low class” are driven to being distinguished from people of their same nature and resist authority and control, this allows the bourgeoisie, or the “high class”, to take control over them. This control that the bourgeoisie possess is a tool that they use to take advantage of the proletariats.

Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels explains the good parts of the communist system and how it should still apply to the future. They also predicted how the Communist Manifesto can stabilize the class structure without conflict. They talks about how especially through the increase in productivity, the power of the bourgeois class increases. They argues that the social class struggle is the reason for historical developments and if there are no more classes then there is no reason to worry about class antagonism. Karl Marx wrote this to warn about the dangers in capitalism. Through the idea of communism, Marx says that the society would not have to be divided into social classes. Marx is saying that society is split up

Marx’ Manifesto of the Communist Party (Bourgeoisie and Proletarians) focused on his views on the exploitation and division of class by modern capitalism. He also spoke about the rise of industrialization as a cause for further exploitation. Marx introduced his argument by this statement “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles”. This means throughout history there has always been some form of class structure, he mentioned the feudal society and there many class systems. He goes on to introduce the modern bourgeoisies’ society who were brought about from the fall of the feudal society. Even with the destruction of the feudal society, class rivalry didn’t go away; it became simpler. The rapid development of the west drove the advancement of the bourgeoisies. The discovery of the new world which opened up communication and trade; the industrial revolution which further advanced the world market. Bourgeois introduced

For many centuries, there have been economic classes who are in conflict with one another for values and rights. These classes are divided between the proletariats and bourgeoisies; they have always been in the position of the capitalist not giving the fair treatment these workers deserve. The proletariats are the vast majority of society, living in poverty working for those in the upper class for little amounts. On the other side are the bourgeoisies; they are the wealthy group of individuals who make their profits off the proletariats productivity.

Predominately, a product of the preceding Enlightenment era, the social theorist and political revolutionary, Karl Marx, lived from 1818 to 1883 and was born and educated in Germany where he studied law, philosophy and history (Siedman 2009). In 1843, Marx migrated to Paris. In 1847, Marx was commissioned by the socialist group, ‘The League of the Just’ to collaborate with Frederick Engels to write ‘The Communist Manifesto’ wherein he described class struggle as history’s engine and notoriously prophesied capitalism’s demise via a revolution of its working class (Siedman 2009). Marx envisaged a socialist society with few social inequalities yet many individual

The Manifesto begins by addressing the issue of class antagonism. Stating, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." Throughout history we see the oppressor and oppressed in constant opposition to each other. This fight is sometimes hidden and sometimes open. However, each time the fight ends in either a revolutionary reconstruction of society or in the classes' common ruin.