The Code Is The Waterfall Methodology

Some people may be good at developing someone else’s idea and so are more effective within a team than working alone.

Redesigning the software development process in an effective way helps in solving many problems. Upon asking question about when exactly the redesign is needed, it is quite obvious that in certain conditions where the involvement by the team and the management is sincere yet the difficulties exist and continue to increase even after a good effort on the particular problem. This has been the same situation in the Jharna Software where the company is privileged with good staff yet they face the problem in the integration stage and also they face difficulty with the suggestions or the changes by the customer on their requirement at later stages.

After analyzing Chapter 10, Group Dynamics and Work Teams, the new concept that was taken from it was the model of Group Development. As a professional engineer, I have been a part of multiple teams that were given the task of creative projects. As every project experiences their different problems, ours did the same. The teams were successful in the end, but of course, the journey to those successes were extremely difficult. Through the tough patches of the projects, the model of group development would have helped the team to effortlessly flow in regards to actually building relationships and achieving team goals. Coming from my viewpoint, I assumed the teams naturally followed the process to some extent, but after being introduced to the Group Development Model, I realized that we were not follow any type of process at all. Most times, problems occur, and we are faced with the challenge of trying to figure it out along the way as we go. Managers should be equipped with the knowledge in order to have the ability in understanding how groups develop and manage the group interaction, and task process at each stage (Osland, 2007, P. 256). In order for our teams to be effective moving forward, I believe it would be beneficial for us to operate accordingly based off of the model. The model of group development breaks down the process into five different stages, which are known as: forming, storming, norming, performing, and

In the article “Small Group Communication” Garth Pittman states that working in groups can actually be very helpful because it will get the job done faster, and develop skills that can be useful at work, school, and/or personal life. He clarifies that people will have different ideas and collaborate with one another to work well in the group. If they can get along well and manage to separate the work, then the project will get done on time without having any troubles. Pittman points out working in groups can get complicated. Few people in the group will not connect with the rest of the members. For those who aren’t used to being in groups can find themselves having a hard time getting use to it. The author believes that there is certain ways

According to Brooks, software projects tend to fail when it comes to time rather than runtime errors, finances, or manpower combined. He states that people tend to have the mindset that more manpower will get a software project done earlier than intended. In Brooks’s opinion, adding more manpower is like “dousing a

The current development process devotes a large amount of time at the front end of development to establishing customer needs and converting them into system level requirements. The client-site team meets with customers, learns their needs, develops specifications, verifies them with the customers, and then sends them offshore for development. This is a very formalized, documented process. (+)

Group setting can affect the quality of solutions. According to Tubbs (2012), “A clear finding of small group research is that groups have the potential to make better-quality decisions than the same individuals would make if working alone” (p.359). When a difficult problem arises, having multiple people work towards a solution instead of one individuals increases the chance of the problem being solved properly (Tubbs, 2012, p.360) Although the group must be prepared to accept the solutions. “For solutions to be effective, they must be of high quality and they must be accepted by those who must carry them out,” states Tubbs (2012, p.363).

I prefer working in a group than their own work because we can help each other in our work than work individually

While Fred Brooks was managing IBM’s OS/360 development he noted a law of software engineering that, after 50 years is still being taught today. "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later"(Brooks 25). This quote identified, as “Brooks law” is a principle, along with many others outline in

It takes a while for a team to be able to work cohesively, productively, and

But there’s an important exception to this research: if the problems are complex, or if they are visual or spatial, then groups usually outperform solo workers. And in most real-world organizations, problems are pretty complex–not the simple word-generation tasks used in brainstorming experiments.

The objective of the Code is to lay out the ethical commitments made by the aged care systems in addition to the legal obligations that have to be complied. The main aims of the code is - identify and lay out the values that are the basis of the conduct and practice of Aged Care facilities provided under the Aged Care Act;

From personal experience I feel better if I can work with just one or two people. Working with more than that most of the time for me it doesn’t work, because when you have different personalities then that is when you have conflicts within a group. I know that you will have to work in a group some of the time, but I think that it is better if you work alone. It also depends on what the job entitles some do want us to work with others and some don’t so it really doesn’t matter to me either way, if I do then I do. When I work with other people at my job we always have fun in doing our jobs, we like what we do and like to work with everyone. We take training classes together, and lunch so we can get along. I feel as though if you can get along with others then you can work in a

We can find inspiration pertaining to additional understanding within the organizational technology, which has extended researched, the actual social aspects associated with exactly how teams perform the job. Applying one model of teaming from Tuckman and Jensen [1] to the software lifecycle, the software development life

Heritage Interactive System was created using a form of Agile Methodologies in that frequent feedback was needed from the Software Users to ensure the finished product would meet the needs of the Organization, and Customer. We are still using this methodology in modifying the system to keep up with the needs of our Customers, and internal processes. What was needed 4 years ago, when I began working at this Organization has been re-modeled several times, based on the needs of our industry and meeting our Customers’ needs along with the increase volume of information. There are several software development methodologies available when creating, and/or revising all Software Programs. In this paper, I am going to discuss CASE Tools and Agile