The Collapse of the Egyptian Regime Essay

Between 1919 and 1952, Egypt struggled to obtain independence and develop a national identity (Botman 1991, 55). The majority of Egyptians were peasants or fallahins who were in a cycle of poverty as a result of the structure of landownership and the division of land through inheritance (Botman 1991, 73). The Wafd, a nationalist body in Egypt, espoused the anti-British movement for the masses and expressed the need for legitimate self-rule (Botman 1991, 55). The British had occupied Egypt since 1882 as a way to restore order and safeguard Egypt’s foreign population (Gordon 1992, 15). However, Egypt’s strategic importance led the British to prolong their short stay and after World War I, Britain declared a protectorate over Egypt (Gordon 1992, 15). Thinking that a postwar settlement might lead to Egyptian independence, a committee of

There is a place where not far from my hometown, which, since my childhood, still holds the secrets to life. It was a place where we were free. Free to do whatever we wanted to do, say whatever we wanted to say, it was our place, our river. It was a simple place, no paved or asphalt roads for the commotion of busy traffic, no tall buildings to block out the sunlight, no sense of time to feel rushed or anxious, no effects from the outside world. It was a beach on the coast of Lake Sakakawea called “Little Egypt.”

If people do not vote, it would lead the country to a very vulnerable and perilous position due to incompetent and irresponsible leaders. Not voting during an election is voting indirectly against democracy and making way for irresponsible leaders (Akande, 2011).

Elections represent vital mechanism of democratic state. In a democracy, voting is a method of decision making, where electorate chooses the officials, who will represent their interest in the government. A vote is a formal and voluntary expression of citizen’s choice for or against a political party, institutional or constitutional change. So the percentage of eligible voters is the voter turnout. Within decades it has a tendency of decreasing and increasing depending on the existing political situation and, most importantly, the willingness of the electorate to change and be a part of the constructive democratic organism. Low turnouts are mostly characterized by the indifference of the voters, the fact that they don’t believe that there will be any kind of change. This is why low turnout is very undesirable.

The debate over compulsory vs. non-compulsory voting is a complex subject matter to say the least, that has sparked much controversy in recent times with almost all strongly in favor of one side of the argument and or the other. This highly polarized debate has sparked in popularity in recent times because of a quote by former president Barak Obama in which he said that “It would be transformative if everybody voted”. It is believed that if everyone voted that could and was eligible then the domination of hard core partisans within the political system would be in part quelled as the candidates went where the votes are, which would be away from the extremes. Moreover some studies show that mandatory voting decreases the rates of uninformed voters within an area as voting becomes more of a civic duty than right. While the institution of compulsory voting would have a short term effect of increasing the rate of uninformed voters,

The UN has not taken a very strong stance in any of Egypt’s issues, most likely due to the currentness of the topic. The UN has however supported many other Arab Spring related revolutions by deploying the United Nations Support Mission In Libya and supporting human rights in Yemen.

Voting makes it harder for interest groups to bribe their way into power. Most candidates make promises of passing laws that will benefit these Interest groups in return for their donations, however when more voters vote it puts pressure on the

First of all, everyone should vote because voting is essential for a democracy. Democracy in a nation allows people to take part in their government. If a certain country does not have a democracy, then people don’t have the right to speak against dictators and their policies. For example, most of the Middle Eastern countries do not grant their citizens the right to vote. As a consequence, the militant groups such as ISIS are formed. These types of groups are fighting with their governments and yet the dictators are not leaving the office. In a democracy, people have the opportunity to vote for what they believe in. In order for voting to be successful, the citizens of the nation must be educated. According to the author Sam Fulwood, voters are less educated and they they don’t know the importance of it. “While only 19 percent of likely voters have completed at least some college, most non voters 54 percent

While reading a variety of political science articles I have found the conventional wisdom on a multitude of influences and their correlation with voter turnout. Generally what I found while reading is that there is often a motivational factor that causes a person to perform their civic duty by voting . My understanding of the conventional wisdom is that when there is some source of social pressure motivations, it often leads to an increase in voter turnout.

Elections are an important part of creating a legitimate state. They allow us to have a say in how decisions are made in a government. However, the voter turnout for an election does not have an effect on the type of regime that will develop in a state. It does not matter if the election is in an authoritarian government or a democratic one, the regime does not have a large impact on the turnout of voters. What matters in voter turnout is whether the citizens believe in the regime. If they feel that the state is legitimate then they are more likely to vote. Also, if the voters believe that their vote counts and is not a ‘wasted vote’ then you are more likely to have a larger voter turnout. For example, the International Institute for Democracy

In the 2012 United States Presidential election 58.2 percent of the registered voters turnout out to vote (IDEA). This figure is in stark contrast to many other wealthy democracies in the western world for the same election cycle (IDEA). This begs the question, why is voter turnout significantly lower in the US compared to the rest of the first world and other OECD countries? There are countless factors that could affect voter turnout, the most standard of which are based on socioeconomic status. But when considering only developed nations, more is at play in predicting turnout. Focus is turned to institutional factors and the effect election mechanisms, such as registration laws and party systems, have on political participation.

Voting makes one feel connected with their country because their vote has been counted for an action that could possibly change how everything works in their nation or being able to choose the right representative for the people. The political rights of an Iranian citizen are minuscule compared to the political rights of an American. An Iranian citizen has very miniscule rights and it always depended on the Shah. His wealth and portrayal as royalty brainwashed the Iranian citizens in some sort of way. His image of importance left citizens rooting for him and they had no right to vote and the form of government was a monarchy. In America, our form of government is a democracy. There is no monarchy, no royalty. American citizens have the ability

With the development of human society, civilization is incessantly progressive. One aspect of human civilization’s progress is political civilization. Democratic politics can be considered to be the representatives of political civilization. When people refer to the history of human progress, they find that human beings struggle to achieve this great goal and no one can stop the human desire for political freedom. In 2011, one more country took a step towards democracy. Egypt is in the ancient, sacred and conservative Middle East. Egyptians are cheering for their own political aspirations as they overthrew Mubarak’s dictatorship, and are gradually making efforts to establish a democratic and peaceful country.

Egypt today can be a viable market for the foreign investor, especially the investor who has the ability to see the rewards of in investing in the region for the long haul. The world and Egypt both realize that the region is the gateway to the Middle East. Egypt is leading the way for Arabic countries to embrace a new way of doing business and opening their borders to the ‘global village’ concept.

Mandatory voting has been a topic of debate in democratic countries since the creation of democratic republics themselves. Voting is a crucial part of democracy because it determines who will be the leaders of both the voters and nonvoters. It is the right of a citizen to vote, but whether or not it is the responsibility remains disputed. However, voting must be performed with a basic understanding of policy and what it takes for someone to fit the role which they are running for. Voting should not be compulsory because it results in more uneducated voting that counteracts the educated voting.