The Communist Party Of Nepal

By means of land redistribution and Import Substitution Industrialization, PRI reinforced economic and social defections and even further promoted the remarkable economic development. In political aspect, it also largely contributed to settle down the ethnic and regional conflicts and created an atmosphere that was conducive to co-operate. As Andreas Schedler mentions in his journal, PRI brought “the end to armed strife between regional warlords and rival revolutionary factions by its foundation (pg 5, Schedler, 2000)” . Besides in accordance to the 2000 released article from the Economist, PRI used to fund the opposition political parties in order to maintain their existence in politics (The Economist, 2000). In brief, the PRI govern on the basis on collaboration, not on coercion.

In the country there is some political unrest between the major parties such as the largest party in Nepal, the Nepali Congress, Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist), which is the second largest, and the third, the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). It was most prevalent in 1996 as the Communist party of Nepal launched a civil war that lasted 10 years and claimed the lives of 13,000 lives . This conflict led to an agreement between parties to keep the civil unrest quelled, and in turn

Whether the leadership of the country knew it or not the country was changing and the election would be the corner stone of the type of Union it would become centuries later. Since the beginning of the newly independent Republic union there were two different political parties the

In the early to mid 1960's the Communist party split into the radicals and the moderates. Mao

From the outset there was disunity within and between opposition. A case where this has happened is disunity between the Social Democrats, who’s activities did not stand any chance of succeeding any of their aims; the reason for this being their was no solidarity between the social democrats after the 1933 election when the Nazis came to power. Because of this the Social Democrats could not spread the same message across the country; this is a major issue when the Social Democrats are trying to gain support to even think of rebellion on a mass scale. The Communists had determination to produce a successful revolution from the beginning and tried but they also had the same issues with many of the leaders either had been killed, imprisoned or exiled. There was also hatred between the Communists and the Social Democrats that had gone on for sometime; this also makes it harder for their goals to succeed; if they came together and stood together, they may have had a better chance at causing a rebellion; but this was never going to happen due to the long lasting hatred. Although there was constant communist resistance through the whole period, for example Rote Kapelle was an active communist resistance group trying to stage many revolutions but never succeeded and in 1942 were caught and executed. Although the

Contrary to popular belief, the party did not wish to stage a violent uprising. They understood, however, that “the source of violence almost always comes from the established order, which resorts to civil war or violent repression to prevent a peaceful revolution.” The actual chance of a successful revolution by the CPUSA has been described as absurd. The group was highly disorganized and membership peaked at less than a fraction of a perfect of the total population.

The Khmer Rouge group was created in the 1940s, but it was during the Vietnam War that the KR gained more power and became more prominent. The Khmer Rouge is an off-shot from the North Vietnamese government and essentially was funded by their government. The Vietnamese helped to make the KR a real political party in the Cambodian political system. Without their help, they could not afford to provide a whole army guns, military vehicles, and other military resources. It was in 68’ when the group launched a full scale national uprising. They wanted to make a unrealistic “fair” society where there was no

By early 1949, Mao’s Communist forces had gained full control and formed the PRC. Its stated goals included returning Tibet, Xinjiang, and Mongolia to the

Since the downfall of Pol Pot and Nuon Chea in 1979 following the Cambodian-Vietnamese War, the political climate and development of Cambodia have been shrouded beneath a cloud of instability, unrest, and capriciousness. Although Cambodia has since made the move towards fully democratic rule, the nature and legitimacy of this democracy remains subject to intensive international critique and controversy. While now officially a “democratic” state, many of the ideological mannerism present within the regime of the Khmer Rouge still exist today, although much more subtle and concealed. Some of these include incredibly strong anti-Vietnamese sentiment, the censorship of dissenting political opinions (which has been rampant throughout Cambodia's recent elections and continues in the follow up to the general election of 2018), a strict centralized government, and the killings of reporters and activists (eg. the murders of Chea Vichea and Chut Wutty). With the downfall of the Khmer Rouge, the volatile political climate allowed for the rise and solidification of Hun Sen's power, the current PM of Cambodia who has been in office for decades. Thus, the Khmer Rouge and genocide effectively set the stage, at least somewhat, for the rise and tenure of

One-party dominance has no uncontested definition. The idea has been used to refer to the protracted electoral and ideological dominance of a single party in a representative democracy. It requires, but suggests more than, a series of electoral successes. OPD implies institutions that translate electoral success into political power; the capacity to attract support from substantial electorates over an extended period; the presence of a unifying historical project; and the ability to dominate the policy agenda of a country (Pempel 1990: 3–4, 340–2). In Duverger’s (1954: 308–9) memorable phrase, a dominant party is ‘identified with an epoch’, its ideas dominating public debate and its dominant position acknowledged by citizens and elites alike.

In 1940s, because of supporting by the Vietnamese, the Cambodian communist movement was created to fight against France colonization. In 1962, Pol Pot had become the leader of CPK was flee into the jungle to escape from King Norodom Sihanouk, because

since then. Its popularity went up each time it pulled out the country out of political instability

“Their were different political parties which the people acknowledge to support the rise of this new economic development era. One party in particular is the

After a bitter civil war (1946-1949), which faced the major Chinese parties Kuomintang and CCP, Kuomintang’s defeat, evidenced with Chiang’s and 200.000 people´s fled to Formosa, Mao Zedong (1893-1976), born in Shoshan, Hunan, proclaimed the new People´s Republic of China with himself as both Chairman of the CCP and President of the republic in October 1949. How did the under numbered and weak CCP, founded by the same person in 1921 manage to survive several extermination campaigns and re-organize the party to win the civil war, crushing opposition and establish the Chinese

Five things put pressure on Nepali leaders to deliver the constitution this time around. First, the Nepali Congress Party and the Communist Party of Nepal (UML), which preferred a few multi-ethnic states, secured nearly two-thirds majority in the assembly and formed a coalition government with smaller parties, enhacing their strength further. Thus they had the number and confidence to sail the charter to the finish line.