The Company Secretary, Prescribed Officers

Next, you have to contact the regional director, Peter, as quick as possible, although he may be preparing for the family funeral. It is important to let him know the incident that the financial director had a little deviation on the understandings for the extra costs and the date receiving the income. Also, you ought to suggest Peter to make a correction on those data.

According to the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Act, it is the responsibility of the management to establish and maintain internal controls required for financial reporting. The company’s latest year assessment of

Welcome to TOP Education and TLAW201 COMPANY LAW. This document provides you with information relevant to successful completion of this unit; including schedule of lecture topics, prescribed texts, assessment policies, assessment tasks, examinations, academic and administrative contacts and online learning support facilities.

These different stakeholders consider financial information available to them from slightly different perspectives to meet their own needs (Carlon 2016).

The act requires management to disclose all material information or changes within their accounting processes. By requiring senior management to review the reports they are held accountable for the financial accounting of the firm, and procedures to prevent employees and other members within an organization from committing fraud or theft and management is legally responsible if material misstatements have been made. By making management accountable then they are less likely to commit fraud if faced with jail time. Management and stockholders frequently have different goals. Management often wishes to expand and use the company’s assets in different ways than a stockholder. Management’s accountability of the financial reports often helps encourage management to use company assets in appropriate ways. Disclosures were also a reduction in risk of fraud because all material information must be disclosed. By requiring this disclosure if a company’s net income increased this year due to a

If the accounts and projections are not updated, then the financial statements will mislead the auditors, bank officials and the users of the financial information in their judgment of the company’s financial health. This practice is dishonest and contradicts the integrity principle per the Code of Conduct. The objectivity principle states that the professionals should not be prejudiced and should be free of conflicts of interest in discharging their duties diligently. The question here is whether there is any basis on which Bill and Dan may not make disclosures to the external auditors or anyone else. What can be the best procedure to comply with the relevant laws and regulations so as not to discredit the profession and the company? These dilemmas can be solved by involving the Directors and the audit

The act is an exhaustive piece of legislation that contains eleven major section and some of the most important titles outline requirements on auditor independence, analyst conflict of interests, corporate responsibility, enhanced financial disclosures, internal controls assessment, and corporate fraud accountability (Bainbridge, 2007). One of the main benefits of the legislation is to establish auditor independence requirements and rules for the prevention of conflicts of interest in particular by prohibiting auditing firms from offering other services. Prior to Sarbanes–Oxley, the auditing professionals were self-regulated and the decisions that controlled the industry, such as violation of ethical standards, were made largely by auditors themselves (Verschoor, 2012). In order to prevent conflict of interests, the Sarbanes–Oxley Act grants the PCAOB authority to oversee and regulate auditing firms, conduct investigations, and impose disciplinary sanctions against accounting firms (McDonough, 2004). Another provision of the Act is requiring senior executives to be personally accountable and responsible for the financial information reports by certifying that the information is correct.(Welch, 2006). A byproduct of the law implementation is a significant quality improvement on accounting practices;

The concept of a whistleblower is that of a person who decides to report unethical or illegal actions of or within their place of employment. From the text, an extension of the previous definition goes on to say, “They may be working for private companies, nonprofit organizations, or for the government. They may disclose information inside or outside their organizations—to supervisors, regulators, or to the media.” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012, p.47) Based on the definition, anyone of us can be a whistleblower. It doesn’t seem that the information disclosed is limited in anyway. Although, some of the information may not be protected

employees, usually in the form of a union, in order to form an agreement on whatever issues the

Stakeholders can be divided into internal and external claimants. Internal claimants include shareholders and employees including the managers of the firm. External claimants typically comprise customers, suppliers, bankers, competitors, governments, trade unions, alliance partners, communities and the general public. Looking further into external stakeholders one could, also include the environment.

The decisions affect particular groups of stakeholders in the operations of the firm. The pertinent question is thus, Whomwould this decision

These employee’s include engineers, assistants, secretaries, drivers, human resources, trainers, marketers and accounting, all employees indirectly related to the production and sale of the product.

Integrity might cause problems in this case as the main persons in this organization are family members and there are also family members with high functions in the bank and JRW Realty with which Prefab has close business relations. Moreover, the members of the audit and compensation committee are not all independent of the firm and therefore, the likelihood of fraud or material misstatements in the financial statements is quite high. The profitability of the engagement to the auditor should be considered as well. Due to the extensive investigation the auditor has to do, especially due to the relationships between the people at the top management and the independence of the audit and compensation committee, the profitability might be a concern. Furthermore, from the analysis of the business risks of accepting the audit it can be concluded that there are several severe problem areas in which fraud or material misstatements in the financial statements can take place. At the Prefab Sprout Company the risk of fraud or material misstatements is considered to be very high and therefore, the engagement should not be accepted.

Firstly, internal stakeholders, those connected directly to the firm. This group include will account for anyone working within the firm. In the context of the mining company, this includes people like miners, even jobs like those of a janitor in the building. However, it is important to note that it also involves much more powerful stakeholders like senior management, who play a large role in the decisions made by the company.

This article initiates with the introduction on what is audit planning. It basically addresses the audit plan strategy of K & S Corporation limited’s Financial Statements. Being an external auditor of the company, key factors to be considered in auditing the financials of the subject company have been discussed in the article. The most significant accounts at risk being materially misstated have been critically examined citing the possible risks associated with such accounts. Last but not the least, the article concludes with recommendations with respect to audit assessment plan of the company. Hence, this article seeks to act as a ready reckoner guide for an audit manager in audit planning of K & S Corporation Limited.