The Components Of The Electoral College

Another problem surrounding the Electoral College system is that it allows one-party states, states that almost always go to one party. In this context, a Democrat who casts a vote in a mostly Republican state feels that his vote is wasted because of no way that state will be won by a Democrat. Besides, the system is based on two-party elections, the Democrat and the Republican leaving Americans with two candidates to choose (Belenky, 364). The voters end up picking the candidate with fewer issues rather than the one they support. In my opinion, people feel that Electoral College has single-handedly defeated

The Electoral College gained its origins when our countries fore fathers gathered at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and began brainstorming on different methods to elect a President. The Electoral College at the time was created to be a

It was Speaker of the House Clay, who was eliminated from the selection process because he came in fourth, that wrapped up the election for Adams by openly supporting him in the House of Representatives. The issue did not end there, however. The populace was none too happy about this incident; four years later Jackson defeated Adams (Longley and Braun 36-37).In the 1876 election, Samuel Tilden gained about 250,000 more popular votes than Rutherford Hayes, but still lost the election by an electoral vote of 185 to 184 (Longley and Braun 33-34). The contest had been so close in South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana, with both sides claiming fraud, that each of these states cast their electoral votes for both candidates. Congress eventually set up a commission which, with a bit of politicking, chose to give Hayes the electoral votes of all three states, thus securing his election. Later, Congress passed a law that gave the states the right to determine the legality of their own elector choices and required a majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate in order to reject the electoral vote of any state (Kimberling 9). By far, the most disturbing instance of Electoral College failure is that even in the year 2000 a minority president was able to be elected. In the 2000 election, Al Gore received over 500,000 more popular votes than George W. Bush,

electors are chosen. All electoral votes in a state go to the candidate that gets the most votes, and

The Electoral College makes it possible for citizens’ votes in certain states to essentially not matter at all. Since all of the electoral votes go toward the candidate that wins the popular vote in a state, if a state has a majority of people who vote for a certain party and a voter votes for the other party, his vote does not have any effect on the election outcome. The Electoral College system is leaving hundreds of thousands of vote’s discounted and irrelevant. The Electoral College twists each vote’s worth per state, causing the nation’s desires to be misrepresented. The Electoral College does not always show a distribution of support. A candidate could win the electoral votes

The article, “Electoral College: An Overview,” written by Ballaro, Beverly, Bourassa, and Cheryl, explains how the electoral college is used and why people do not support it. This article targets anyone who is able to vote in the 2016 election. The purpose of this article is to inform voters that their vote does not always choose the president and explains how the president is chosen and the system behind it. The thesis of this article explains that many people abroad are still unaware that the president is not elected directly by the people. The president is chosen by the electoral college. The electoral college is a body of electors chosen to elect the president and vice president of the united states. This setup allows the chance for an

1787 saw the creation of the Electoral College due to he public lacking enough knowledge to make an enlightened decision on whom to vote for. However, now things are much different in the 21st Century than they were in the 1700’s. Due to new technological innovations, we are able to actually look into our candidate and truly decide if he/she is the one we want to vote for. It for this, and many other reasons that the Electoral College is outdated and unfair, and the Government should shift to the more direct popular vote.

The Founding Fathers worked to create an equal nation without the chance of an oppressive ruler, such as King George the Third. They hoped to balance the power and make sure that the nation was never in the hands of a leader like him. To accomplish this goal of equal representation they created the Electoral College. This created a system where Americans when voting for the President, weren’t voting directly for the candidates and were voting for electors that would cast votes to represent their state. Although this system worked in the time that it was created, when there were fewer states and people, now there are problems within this system leading to an election that isn’t as representative of the nation as the Founding Fathers would have probably wanted. Although it provides many benefits and is better than other systems of electing presidents, there are too many ambiguities for the system to not be labeled as wrong and unequal. The Electoral College is an inept and disadvantageous system due to its influence on the citizen’s efficacy, misrepresentation of the people, the chance of electing a president that the majority don’t want, and the ability of

The idea of this “Electoral College” arose in the summer of 1787. There were multiple proposals

Electoral votes are distributed fairly among the states and should continue to be determined by population. When no candidate wins the majority of electoral votes, the winner should be the nominee with the most votes, not by the House of Representatives. The winner take all system should also be abolished in favor of a district vote system. If the Electoral College were abolished, elections would become chaotic, with people committing voter fraud and political machines controlling the outcome. The Electoral College protects the idea of popular sovereignty that the United States was founded

The Electoral College is one of those things that differentiate the American electoral process from the rest of the world. It is an old institution that has been fundamental to the American political system ever since the Declaration of Independence. There have been calls to disband this way of voting to join the rest of the world with the ordinary populace voting. During the month of November in a presidential election year, every state holds an election in which all citizens who qualify may participate. They cast a ticket for president and his vice president. After this voting, the winning party is allowed to choose a slate of

The arguments to modify or eliminate the Electoral College system are all derived from the notion that it is outdated. Under the current system if a candidate wins a large states like California, then they win twenty percent of the needed votes even though California only accounts for eleven percent of the U.S. population. What's more is a president can be elected without winning a majority of the popular vote. This has happened 15 times in U.S. history. The

Each state appoints a number of electors that equals the number of senators and representatives of their state. The popular vote determines how the electoral college of each state will vote. The candidate with highest amount of votes from the electoral colleges wins the election. This process of electing a president based on the majority of electoral votes began when the Constitution was written in 1776. Our forefathers designed this system because they felt it was the fairest way to govern.

(O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) So the Framers decided that Presidents wouldn't be popularly elected. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) Instead, a group of electors equal in number to that of the state's number of representatives in the House and Senate would be designated by appointment or by popular vote. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) Whichever candidate received a majority of the electors won the presidency. (O'Connor and Sabato, 2000) This means there are a total of 538 electoral votes up for grabs, and 270 of those votes are needed to win the majority. (Rosenberg, 2000) In the case that no candidate reaches 270 votes, the House would select a president and the Senate would choose the vice president. (Rosenberg, 2000) This particular situation occurred in 1800 when Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr both received 73 electoral votes. (Rosenberg, 2000) The House eventually gave the victory to Thomas Jefferson.(Rosenberg, 2000) Then in 1824, 1876, and 1888 a candidate lost the popular vote, but still won the presidency. (Rosenberg, 2000) Since our nation has entered the 20th century, there have still been several crises in which the Electoral College is to blame. In the election of 1976, Democrat Jimmy Carter received 1.7 million more votes than the

The electoral college is a process of the meeting of electors where they will vote for the President of the United States of America. The electoral college consists of 538 electors in which a presidential candidate needs 270 to be elected. The number of electors in each state is based around how many Congressional delegation. Each party picks electors from each state to represent and vote for the candidate who wins the state. This system has been proven to provide strange results. So far in history, four candidates who have won the popular vote have lost the presidential race because of the electoral college; this happened in 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016. In 2000 and 2016, there has been a big push for the National Popular Interstate Compact, which will allow the presidency to whoever wins the popular vote. Ten states have adopted this pact and more normally get added each election. The electoral college is a confusing process that some Americans praise, while other 's don 't. Until we amend the