The Compromise Of 1850, And The Kansas-Nebraska Act

The compromise of 1850 was a settlement on a series of issues plaguing the unity of the states. The primary issue to address was the institution of slavery, which was causing much dissension between the north and the south. Additional items to be addressed were territory issues and to prevent secession by the south. Henry Clay stepped forward to present a compromise, which had Congress in an eight-month discussion known as the “Great Debate”. As a result of the proposal, there were strong oppositions. One outspoken person who opposed the proposal was John C Calhoun. Calhoun was an intellectual southern politician, political philosopher and a proponent to the protection of Southern interests. He was an advocate for states’ rights and

popular sovereignty was the nation's topic during the 1850s. It was included in several important files including the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Compromise of 1850. famous sovereignty, or the capacity of a country to determine whether or no longer allow slavery, turned into visible as a right with the aid of the Southern states and a obvious violation of the national group spirit and supremacy of the constitution by way of the Northern states. The Southerners and Northerners both wondered if the the brand new states had slaves, so that they went into new territories to vote and affect the vote . In the end, this led to fighting in the territories and new states,causing one specifically fight-troubled nation to become referred to

This act divided the Louisiana purchase into two territories( Kansas and Nebraska ). Popular sovereignty would be used to determine if these territories would contain slavery or not. This eliminated the Missouri compromise restriction on slavery north of the 36 30' line. Both anti slavery and pro slavery groups rushed their supporters to vote in Kansas. Almost 5,000 pro-slavery people voted illegally by crossing the border to Missouri, voting in Kansas, then returned back home.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. This act allowed the settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders. After the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed, pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters rushed in to settle Kansas to affect the outcome of the first election held there after the law went into effect. The pro slavery settlers were charged with fraud by anti-slavery settlers and they refused to accept the results. After weeks later, the anti- slavery settlers held another election, but the problem was that the pro slavery settlers refused to vote. Later on, the anti and pro slave settlers started fighting with each other. The anti slaves settlers had John Brown

Many Northerners were infuriated when Congress eliminated the Missouri Compromise and passed on the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The act allowed each territory to settle the issue of slavery based on popular sovereignty (The Kansas-Nebraska). In other words, people were allowed to decide for themselves to determine what was best for their state. By repealing the Missouri Compromise, the North fear that it will enable slavery into areas that have been free for years. However, once Congress passed the law, numerous of pro-slavery and antislavery groups began rushing into Kansas(Chapter 15, 443). Their primary goal was to get in as many votes as possible which will determine if Kansas legislature support or ban slavery. In the final results, Kansas laws

n 1854, the U.S. Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which basically opened all new domains to servitude by declaring the guideline of well known sway over congressional decree. Master and abolitionist servitude strengths battled viciously in "Draining Kansas," while resistance to the demonstration in the North prompted the development of the Republican Party, another political substance in light of the standard of restricting subjection 's expansion into the western domains. After the Supreme Court 's decision in the Dred Scott case (1857) affirmed the lawfulness of subjugation in the regions, the abolitionist John Brown 's attack at Harper 's Ferry in 1859 persuaded increasingly southerners that their northern neighbors were twisted

What was the 1850 Compromise and Why did it Fail? In 1850, Henry Clay one of the most influential political leaders in American history introduced a set of resolutions, which aimed to please both North and South America. The five proposals were rolled into a single 'omnibus' bill, which offered a solution to the growing sectional conflict over slavery and westward expansion, which arose from the 1846 Mexican War. The 1850 Compromise, which Senator Douglas stripped down and effectively helped pass, failed for a number of reasons, the greatest of which was that it was unable to please both anti-slave and pro-slave groups.

The initial purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to open up thousands of new farms and make feasible a midwestern Transcontinental Railroad. But, as popular sovereignty become a factor in the decision of the states being the pro or against slavery change the purpose of the act for the people. The act provided organization of the Kansas and Nebraska territories. The tension between pro-slavery and free-soil factions over slavery in new territories increased to the higher level because of the popular sovereignty. Nebraska Territory lay north of 36"30', so the Missouri Compromise was repealed. This act passed Congress, but it angered North and led to the collapse of the Democrats and the rise of the Republicans.

The five bills constructed by Henry Clay and passed by the United States Congress were created in attempt to solve the crisis between the Northern and Southern states. Bringing these bills into the situation had kept more of a balance between these two sections than in the past. This document brought the United States into smaller tensions and resolved many issues due to the difference of viewpoints in slavery distributed along the United States. This compromise had fundamental significance on individuals, communities, nations, and the world. The amount of trouble between both areas of the United States started to lessen when the compromise was created and brought more balance into the community. The immediate impact of the compromise less conflicts between the Northern and Southern states, but it had also caused more tension at the same time. To every compromise, there are always positives and negatives sides to it. A positive impact for the South would be the reinforcement of the fugitive slave act. Another advantage they had would be Texas being given ten million dollars to pay for their debt towards Mexico. Positive for the North would be having California admitted as a free state. An additional advantage would be slave trade being prohibited in Washington D.C., the nation’s capital. Although a bill can be positive for one side, it would be negative for the opposing side

The Compromise of 1850 was a package with a total of five bills passed by the United States Congress in september 1850, which defused a four year political confrontation between slave and free states regarding the states territories acquired during the Mexican American War. The Compromise which dealt with a host of issues, including territorial expansion, the extension of slavery, and the Fugitive Slave Act, was the signature legislative accomplishment of the decade. The South gained by the strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Law and the North gained a new free state. California and Texas lost territory but, were each compensated with 10 million dollars to pay for their debt. Slave trade was prohibited in Washington D.C,

“I know no South, no North, no East, no West, to which I owe any allegiance, The Union, sir, is my country” - Henry Clay (United States History). The Compromise of 1850 was once considered despising, loathing, and abhorring. This would become altered, as it would turn out to be one of the greatest compromises in the United States and would make its mark in history. The Compromise of 1850 adopted the Fugitive Slave Act and the reason for California statehood. The compromise attempted to avoid a crisis between the North and the South, with the assistance of Henry Clay and his colleagues. The document came to be with three main ideas: significance, conflict, and compromise. The Compromise of 1850, proposed by Henry Clay, dealt with disputes

After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska act in 1854 which allowed for slavery in areas in the Louisiana Purchase, many Northerners banded together to form the Republican Party in opposition to slavery and non-sectionalism. The election of Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln to the Presidency in 1860 caused many southern states to fear the abolition of slavery and its effects upon their livelihood. Lead by South Carolina, most of the southern cotton growing states seceded as well. When the time for war came, the North seemed ready. "Five and a half million white Southerners faced a total white population of some twenty million. The Union boasted more than eight out of ten factories, more than 70 percent of railroad mileage, all the

Nebraska was so far north that its future as a free state was never in question. But Kansas was next to the slave state of Missouri. In an era that would come to be known as "Bleeding Kansas," the territory would become a battleground over the slavery question.

The compromises merely worked, and with the passing of time, tensions rose more between the sections, thus making these compromises less and less effective. The Compromise of 1850 enraged both the North and the South. When California was annexed, it was assigned to become a free state and the South did not appeal to that because the land boundaries that was made by the Missouri Compromise was large. Another part of this compromise that angered Southerners was that slave trade was banned in Washington D.C. The Fugitive Slave Law, which was a part of the Compromise of 1850 angered the North, because it allowed bounty hunters to hunt down slaves and the people who helped them to hide. Also, Northerners rejected this because they rejected Popular Sovereignty, which created possibilities of having slavery in any Northern states.

A Civil War is a battle between the same citizens in a country. The American Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865 to determine the independence for the Confederacy or the survival of the Union. By the time Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 1861, in the mist of 34 states, the constant disagreement caused seven Southern slave states to their independence from the United States and formed the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy, generally known as the South, grew to include eleven states. The states that remained devoted to the US were known as the Union or the North. The number one question that is never completely understood about the Civil War is what caused the war. There were multiple events that led to the groundbreaking, bloody, and political war.