The Cons of Animal Testing Essay

In the problem, there are always opposite sides which can create the debate about using animals in the laboratory experiments. Some people want to

A contrary explanation to how alternatives will work is that they are, in fact, reliable and accurate. The Pro animal testing advocates claim that the alternatives are not at all ready for use. Consequently, this makes many turn away from the possibilities. While alternatives are still new, they have proven their usefulness, and some companies such as L’Oréal took advantage of this new approach by using donated tissues instead of animals for testing. Further, “Cross disciplinary innovative technologies have saved over 25 million animals” (Ericson 1). It would be untruthful to say that the alternatives have not shown the ability to function. However, some are still skeptical that alternatives will "kick out" animal testing completely. Consider

Can you imagine being locked up in a cage with no control over anything? Not even when you eat? That is how life is like for an animal in research labs. They are abused and the lab researchers don’t care. Even though there are a very few benefits to using animals for research, there are many benefits for not using them. Animal testing is costly, animals are mistreated, and there are many other safe alternatives.

In 2010 Minnesota used 2,073, New jersey used 6,077 dogs, and Massachusetts used 7,458 primates. 95% of animals that are used in experiments is not protected by the animal welfare act. The welfare act does not cover rats, fish, mice, and birds which comprise around 95% of animals in research. The 25 million animals, not covered by AWA are especially vulnerable to being abused and missed treated. People that are against animal testing should stand up and protest for the rights to abolish animal testing.

1.Lately, animals testing became one of the most controversial topics all over the world. Some people support it and other people want to abolish it firmly. But what are its pros and cons?

We should not be testing animals for human things. Why, well there is so many things that could happen, or in general, it is WRONG. Animals are just like humans. Just think, animals might think that to them we are animals. How would you feel if your own pet that you have had your whole life and loved had been in the works of being tested on. I know I would feel horrible. That is what is happening. Innocent animals are being tested on for our own good. There are so many reasons why we should not be testing on animals.

Animal testing has started long back in the ancient Greek times. Greek physician Galen dissected animals, this became known as vivisection, which he studied. Since then animal testing has long grew. Over the many years our people have been either against or with animal testing. Animal testing has been an issue that has been occurring for many years and will continue into our future. Over the years our culture has created organizations for people both sides of this topic trying to convince others to be choosing a side. We the people are now able to make our own decision on which side we want to be on.

During 384-322 BC, Aristotle performed the first animal experiment on living animals. Galen, a 2nd century Rome physician, was considered “Father of Vivisection”. The animals that Galen dissected was goats and pigs. Eight hundred years later in current day Spain, was Avenzoar, who proposed animal testing as an experimental method before applying to humans. Since then, animal experimentation and research has been with us for thousands of years. It is has been the most effective method to test new medicines and new treatments. Due to its benefits; finding new medicines, controlled experimentation, and discovered new diseases in the animal kingdom, animal research is necessary to further expand our medical and biological knowledge.

After three dogs were forced to ingest a test substance every day for five days at Charles River Laboratories, they experienced labored breathing and a high heart rate. They became cold to the touch, were not able to be aroused and were seen with the test substance in their mouths and on their bodies. One dog died and the other two were euthanized one to two days later. (“Examples of Severe Animal Suffering in Laboratories”)

it's a constant race to discover the next big medical break or scientific discovery where often times an animal was used, without the use of animal testing we wouldn’t of been able to discover the things we have because there’s no alternative to animal testing because nothing is closer in DNA and of the living life form.

It shows clearly that animal testing is very cruel and inhumane, because scientist force them to eat and drink just for experiment. “For example: forcing dogs to inhale cigarette smoke did not show a link to lung cancer; Flossing, an arthritis medication, tested safe in monkeys but caused deaths in humans; and the recalled diet drug fen-phen caused no heart damage in animals, while it did in humans--just a small sampling of volumes of examples.” (NEAVS-- New England anti-vivisection society)

“They are enslaved, beaten, and kept in chains… mutilated and confined in tiny cages… burned, blinded, poisoned, and cut up alive in the name of ‘science’... electrocuted, strangled, and skinned alive…” (Animals in Medical). Animals have been subject to experimentation and testing for “science” since 258 BC. Animal testing used to be used for the benefit of animals and mankind, however animal experimentation has gone downhill from when it first started. Some say that animal experimentation benefits society and its advancement of medicine, however, animal experimentation is wrong because it causes unnecessary pain to animals that have not done anything to us.

Ninety-two percent of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don't work. (Top Five, (n.d)). Everything we use from medications and vaccines to makeup and hygiene products; such as shampoo, conditioner all have to be tested and deemed safe for human use and consumption. One way to test to insure these things are safe is to test these products on animals. There are many reasons why animal testing should not be allowed, first being that the results vary greatly between humans and animals, secondly it is unethical and abusive and third there are other methods available to test products. Although people say they’re just animals, product testing on animals is unethical and abusive, and there are alternative options to test.

Many people buy products that were tested on animals without realizing it. Companies like Victoria’s Secret, Dior, Maybelline, and many other companies all test their products on animals. Each year over one-hundred million animals in the U.S. die in laboratories for experiments. Animals such as dogs, cats, pigs, birds, rats, and mice have all fallen victim to animal testing. Animal testing certainly did help humanity, but it is no longer a moral or efficient way to test products. Alternatives such as using In vitro testing, using computer models, using volunteers, and using 3d printed parts are more efficient and humane.

and or cells, primates would be used during the experiment since it is the closest related animal to humans and it needs to be closely related to test on because of how specific the information reviewed from the experiments needs to be for it to work on humans. Although this is just one example of animal testing, some of the experiments can be a psychological experiment which does not cause any physical harm to the animals being tested on, such as “a rat learns to press a button” for the cause of receiving food pellets (Collier). This is an example of how not all experiments are cruel experiments that seem close of killing animals for little to no results. Even if there were to be experiments that would cause some sort of physical harm to the animals, animals will be euthanized in the labs with a some anesthetic so the animal “simply goes to sleep” which is not inhumane(Collier). To test mental illnesses, it would need to be tested on a deeper level than just an MRI, it would need to be on a molecular level, which is where an MRI on a human would not be able to work, but seeing it on an animal would which is required to get any results. Yet even with the reasonable cause, many scientists will face much harassment and threats from extremist’s groups causing havoc right in front of their own houses such as destroying property and yelling “truly heinous things” which does not seem fair or right (Collier). Everybody should have the rights to have their own opinions on certain