The Consequences Of A Three-Tier System In Health Care

In tutorial #5 we were put into groups and debated the pros and cons of Canada having a two tier healthcare system. Two tier healthcare is where the government provides healthcare for its citizens and people also have the option of using private companies to receive their medical care. Single tier health care is where the government alone can provide healthcare for its citizens and no private firms may provide health care. Currently Canada is one of the few countries in world which only operates under a government run universal healthcare.

As Americans we should all be afforded access to healthcare. Access to healthcare is an individual right according to the human rights amendment. The human right to health guarantees a system of health protection for all. The human right to health means that everyone has the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, which includes access to all medical services, sanitation, adequate food, decent housing, healthy working conditions and a clean environment (What is the Human Right to Health and Health Care, 2015). However there are strengths and weaknesses to every healthcare system and the U.S. Healthcare system is not exempt. I plan to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the U. S. Healthcare system (What is the Human Right to Health and Health Care, 2015).

The U.S. health care system is way more complex than what meets the eye. A major difference between the health care system in the U.S. and other nations, is that the U.S. does not have universal health care. Lack of a universal health care opens up the doors for competition amongst insurance, physicians, technology, hospitals and outpatient services.

“The medical model is presented as viewing disability as a problem of the person, directly caused by disease, trauma, or other health condition which therefore requires sustained medical care provided in the form of individual treatment by professionals. In the medical model, management of the disability is aimed at a "cure," or the individual's adjustment and behavioral change that would lead to an "almost-cure" or effective cure.” (Langtree, 2012)

A national health care system in the United States has been a contentious topic of debate for over a century. Social reformists have been fighting for universal health care for all Americans, while the opposition claims that a “social” heath care system has no place in the ‘Land of the Free’.

The United States health care system is lacking the needs to create a reliable system to achieve quality, access, cost, and educate for the consumers. Despite the efforts of the government to find a common ground to meet the standard for the societies, the system has yet to have a major improvement. These issues must be reexamined to fix the broken system. The United States health care expenditure is another issue that needs to be addressed to achieve the future goals of the healthcare system in the United States. Healthcare societies will need to interact differently by incorporating consumer’s empowerment, technology, and education to meet the future goals of the health care system. Also, the consumer must be highly educated on the purpose of preventive care to lower the risk of chronic diseases which account for a lot health care spending. The process of correcting the United States health care system will take time and effort from all individual to achieve greatness.

The first characteristic of the US health care system is that there is no central governing agency which allows for little integration and coordination. While the government has a great influence on the health care system, the system is mostly controlled through private hands. The system is financed publically and privately creating a variety of payments and delivery unlike centrally controlled healthcare systems in other developed countries. The US system is more complex and less manageable than centrally controlled health care systems, which makes it more expensive. The second characteristic of the US health care system is that it is technology driven and focuses on acute care. With more usage of high technology,

In 1988, an information system called the Composite Health Care System (CHCS) was formulated by a company called Science Applications International Corporations (SAIC). Science Application International Corporations won the contract worth $1.02 billion from the Military Health System to design, develop and implement CHCS. Although CHCS information system was designed in 1988, it wasn’t until 1993 that the system was introduced. Since 1993, CHCS has become the biggest medical information system for the military medial facilities. CHCS is the most essential part for the Department of Defense (DoD) for inpatient and outpatient. The system supports 143 military installation worldwide, 1,100 military clinics, and produce thousands of daily

Primary care is the backbone of many industrialized nations, but is the US one of them? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The US lags behind such developed nations in its accessibility of primary care by a huge difference. The United States healthcare system fails to ensure the timely preventative and primary care for its residents. The current estimates indicate that there is merely one physician for every 2,500 patients. Not only Medicare beneficiaries, but also privately insured adults struggle in accessing the right primary care physician at the right time. Moreover, maldistribution of physicians only exacerbates the problem, especially for those residing in health professional shortage areas (HPSA).15 Approximately, sixty-five million Americans live in designated primary care shortage areas.13 Such underserved population faces higher disease and death rates and health disparities that then result in higher rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits—in other words, expensive medical bills.21 More governmental control on the geographic location of primary care physicians can be a first-step to fixing the shortage problem.

2. Here, the research shows that in many situations, healthcare professionals are urged to conduct unnecessary tests and procedures in order to rack up the bill for insurance claims to then

According to Joe Conason, "America 's current health care system wastes considerably more than a trillion dollars every year. We know that because countries such as France, Germany, Japan and Finland, with comparable standards of living to ours, spend roughly half what the United States spends annually on health care per citizen, while covering everyone and achieving better results." (Conason, 2009) The United States healthcare financial systems are severely flawed - affecting the overall cost control, services, and care made accessible to its clients. The rising costs in healthcare are reaching new highs, and with rising costs, there doesn 't seem to be much change in the quality of the care being given. Clients coming in and out of these

In the latest survey, Americans rated the health system excellent with 6%as excellent, 27% believed the system is good, 39% graded as fair and 29% gave as poor. It is hypothesized that Americans have been misinformed by the fact that we can pay for top medical research, some of the most progressive technology in the world and the most current training and techniques for our clinicians. All these might unsighted the average American to the matters that are implanted in the health care System. No other advanced country is so displeased with their own healthcare system. Even if more is expended each year on healthcare, discontent steadily grows. Providers are more typically disappointed with the growing population that is being met which a lack of physicians and facilities which puts much more stress on them in the future. Rule makers are dissatisfied with the confrontation being met with citizens when frustrated with government overreach. Even though, rule makers are still persistent for health care modification to address noticeable systemic issues. Inclusive, there is a general disappointment with the American health care system.

The purpose of this paper is to compare health care systems in three western industrialized democratic societies: The UK, Canada, and the United States. Each nation’s health care system is a reflection of it’s history, politics, economy, and national values (Reid, 2009). Although there are local varations of health care systems, they all tend to follow the same general pattern. In some models, government is both the provider of health care and the payer. In others, doctors and hospitals are in the private sector but government pays the bills. While in other coutries both the providers and the payers are private (Reid, 2009).

The United States healthcare system is unique when compared with that of other developed nations. Shi and Singh (2015) describe 10 different characteristics of the United States system, as well as, several external factors that assert some pressure on the healthcare delivery system. In this discussion, we will focus on access to health care, as one of the characteristics, and information technology as the external force. I will then review what effect the Affordable Care Act of 2010 had on these issues.

in the public health initiative plans. In fact, most of the local Java population refused to build the