The Constitution Best Suitable For Palestine

The American government was founded in 1989, and the basic concept behind the formation is federalism, in which power is shared among state and federal governments and this concept was introduced by the formation of constitution (a document) in which the powers of each division had been described. The major purpose of introducing the constitution was to protect the rights of civilians. The expansion has been encountered in federal government’s powers since the civil war of United States. The constitution of America is heavily based on federal government. The federal government has been separated in three branches judicial branch, legislative, and executive branch.

We’ve so far established that It is no surprise that religion was a huge factor which triggered the creation of Israel but some individuals use the Israel Declaration of Independence to put forward the argument that ‘Israel may be a “Jewish state” in a cultural sense, but at least no more so than America can be called a “Christian state.”’ (Bird, 2014). Theoretically this argue seems valid because the Israeli Declaration of Independence ‘defines the state as granting equality of social and political rights, irrespective of religion, race or sex’ (Nawaz, 2009). Yet what these individuals are failing to acknowledge is no Israeli leadership has or is abiding by these norms and the only people who really are subjected to having these rights are

The state of Israel—rich in tradition and innovation, has in its short existence been one of the most politically interesting phenomenons in the modern world. The state, since the signing of the Declaration of Establishment in 1948 has created a specific form of democracy not seen among many countries throughout the world; democracy which incorporates religious law as well as judicial and social law. Within Israel’s Higher Law, written by Steven V. Mazie, religion and liberal democracy are discussed in regards to the Jewish State. Mazie focuses on the struggle between liberal democracy and religion, and how both affect the two types of people living in Israel—Arabs and Jews. Both groups of Israelis

In the 2014 book, The Israeli Solution: A One State Plan for Peace in the Middle East, Caroline B. Glick, an American-Israeli journalist and author, examines Israeli administration of the contested territories known as Judea and Samaria - also know as the West Bank - since the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. Glick’s work criticises the current state of Israeli policy regarding the administration of the territory, posits a policy recommendation, and discusses challenges in implementing such a method. By appealing to human rights, and Jewish legal and historical rights, Glick suggests that Israel annex the entirety of Judea

Israel has maintained the necessity of these two core principles since Israel declared its sovereignty. The democratic nature of Israel is stated in Israel’s founding document through which Israel came into being in 1948, the Proclamation of Independence. Explicit mention is made of the standing and rights of Israel’s Arab (and by extension, other non-Jewish) inhabitants, as the document promises them “full and equal citizenship and due representation.” The document, which essentially serves as Israel’s identifier, the codification of the purpose and nature of Israel, also reinforces the centrality of the Jewish nature of Israel, declaring that “the Jewish people ... are to be masters of their own fate, like all other nations,

This article draws on various historical events which frame the Israel-Palestine relations. Throughout this article, the Israelites are seen as wanting to engage in peace talks, however their priorities lye on building up a

Since the mid twentieth-century, Palestine has shrunk into a tiny “state” of its own. The land that the Palestinians used to consume is no longer their land. After spending almost half of a year in Palestine (over a few summers), I have experienced the hardships and heartbreak that the Palestinians face each day. Palestinians are not allowed to roam freely, Palestinians are harassed by the Israel Defense Force, and the ownership of Jerusalem is one of the many ongoing battles that the Palestinians face.

Only every once in a long while can even the most talented legal counselor accomplish more than bear the cost of the tyke a cordial face in court and be an outside witness to the unfairness of the procedures. Then the vicinity of such an attorney gives Israel spread to its "legal framework." Perhaps most noteworthy and once in a while saw by individuals in the outside world, is the way that Palestinians live, fundamentally, in a jail in which Israel holds the keys. They can 't leave Gaza or the West Bank unless Israeli watchmen permit them to. In the event that they have been permitted out, they can 't come back to their homes and families unless Israeli gatekeepers license it. Much of the time, in both cases, Israel declines such permission.

The thesis of this article is an examination of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and both the things that have prevented it from being resolved as well as potential solutions or measures directed at establishing peace. The Author’s major arguments in this article start with Israel and how they feel that they have a Biblical right to occupy the areas of the West Bank. The author then goes on to discuss how the Palestinians also feel that they have a right to this land as a birthright because they have occupied this land over time as their own. After discussing why both sides feel as if they deserve to call the land in conflict their own he discusses neither side is happy with what is going on. In this section he discusses how the Israelis

“Israeli forces regularly confiscate private land; imprison individuals without process – including children – and physically abuse them under incarceration; demolish family homes; bulldoze orchards and crops; place entire towns under curfew; destroy shops and businesses; shoot, maim, and kill civilians – and Palestinians are without power to stop any of it.” (A Synopsis).

Few, if any, modern conflicts are as complex as the Arab-Israeli conflict. Specifically, the political situation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has led to bloodshed, political high wire acts, and cycles of hope and disappointment for decades. Consensus has generally leaned towards advocated a two-state solution for the conflict, in which the Israel remains a Jewish state, and the Palestinian Arabs establish their own country carved from currently Israeli-occupied territories. This solution has become more infeasible, not more attainable, efforts to find a lasting peace have occurred. The main alternative, a one-state solution, in which one nation takes full control of the Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip,

On November 29, 1947, The United Nation General Assembly enacted Resolution 181 which dissolved the British Mandate of control over Palestine. UN Resolution 181 established a homeland for Jews dividing Palestine into two separate states, a Jewish state and an Arab state. The UN Partition Plan was welcomed by the displaced Jewish population, but the Arab community pre-existing in Palestine rejected the ‘plan of partition.’ After UN General Assembly Resolution 181 was implemented, a transitional period began within Palestine with the peace and security compromised as a civil war broke out.

Whilst both Palestine have distinct cases for statehood, there cases have also many similarities. Kosovo struggle for statehood has been going on since the collapse of Soviet Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1992. Whilst the Palestinian campaign for statehood has endured since 1948. Examining both of their cases under the theories of statehood and recognition, neither country emerges with a conclusive case for statehood. However, Palestine has the objectively easier case. In order to assess each case for statehood, first one must analyse the different eligibility for statehood under the right to self-determination. Next, one must evaluate the cases for statehood in respect to the different theories of statehood. Following that, one should evaluate each entity’s case for recognition. Having completed the above process, it will become clear whether either state or both states have a strong case for statehood.

In order to understand their current government’s stance on a Palestinian state, a quote from Prime Minister Netanyahu makes it very clear, “Whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel” (Jewish Virtual Library, n.d.). Since the inception of Israel’s statehood in 1948, there has been an ongoing conflict between their governments. The region has many points of contention between Arabs and Jews. The failure to

Between 1922 the British Government used policies to tackle and deal with problems arising in the middle east after World War 1. These policies were used to take advantage points that would later help the success and growth of the British Empire and its colonial states and allied independent states. These policies were made to affect specific groups of people and different societies such as, the Jews in search of a national home, and the Arabs who believed had the claim over Palestine. The British befitted by making policies that would affect their overall strength, economy, and influence in the Middle East. Thought the policies didn’t offer either community political right, it helps the two communities (Arabs and Zionists) to organize their