The Constitutional Convention Of The Constitution

The Anti-federalist were the people who opposed the sanction of the constitution. They were Samuel Adams and John Hancock etc. They believed that the ratification of the constitution will lead to corruption and abuse of power by the government. The suggested constitution did not benefit the people as it should and did not have an assurance of the people’s right to assembly or bear arms. Anti-federalist believed in controlling government authority, therefore with the assumption that the new ratification will be most favorable to the wealthy, it was a threat to their beliefs— meaning that the poorer citizens will not be able to exercise their liberty for fear of double standard by the elite rulers. Most Anti-federalist were farmers and lower class citizens, so we could understand why they were intimidated by the rich and powerful Federalist— who had backgrounds of educations and could have easily manipulate the system for their own gratification.

Antifederalists, in the other hand, feared strong central government, tyranny, and dictatorship, and wanted strong state governments, individual liberties and opposed ratification of the Constitution (until a bill of rights was added). Federalists’ supporters were merchants, skilled workers, laborers, cities and small states. Antifederalists’ supporters were large states and rural areas. Both sides believed in the principles of limited government but had different ways of how to limit the government. Antifederalists feared that the national government would take away all the powers of the state government so that is why they wanted the powers of national government to be limited and specified. They also claimed that the bill of rights should be added to the Constitution to limit government’s powers over

The Anti-Federalist party was made up of people who, for the most part, lived in the country. They were opposed to developing a federal government, and they did not want to ratify the Constitution, which, they claimed, threatened each free person’s liberites, until the authors included the Bill of Rights. (This granted individual rights of citizens. The Anti-Federalists wanted to write down these so that they could not be taken away from the people by the government like England had done.) Instead, they wanted the state governments to keep the power to prevent monarchies and dictatorships. Famous members of this party were Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Mercy Otis Warren, George Mason, Richard Henry Lee, and James Monroe. They favored the Articles of Confederation. However, the Articles of Confederation had a few flaws: if a law was to pass, it would need a majority rule (9/13); it lacked a court system (nationally); and it was missing an executive branch. The Bill of Rights was appreciated because they wanted to make sure that individual rights could not be taken away. The Anti-Federalists may not have been a group that agreed with one another all the time, but as their opinions varied, more rights were thought of and protected. For example, one part of the group held the view that the sovereignty of states could be endangered

Federalists were in favor of a stronger national government and the ratification of the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. Thus, they decided that “only a well-educated group of elected officials should be trusted to make decisions for the good of all.” (Doc 3). Anti-federalists, on the other hand, opposed the creation of a stronger federal government and thus later opposed the ratification of the Constitution; they emphasized individual and state rights. They decided that “freedoms of citizens will not be trampled over by a strong national government.” As a result, they opposed the “rule of a few privileged individuals [overpowering] the will of average citizens.” (Doc

The 1787 Philadelphia Constitutional Convention involved an extensive amount of compromise among the delegates in order to finalize the U.S. Constitution into the structure that it is known for today. On one end of the spectrum were states' righters, or Antifederalists, who were often delegates from smaller states such as Connecticut, and who sought to scale back the power of the federal government. On the other end of the spectrum were the Federalists, who wanted a strong national government to unite the nation. Additionally, there were other delegates who could not be put into such clear-cut categories. What followed at the convention was the process of compromise: a group of men with different ideas about how government should be structured,

The intention of having the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was to adjust the Articles of Confederation, but with fifty-five delegates, also known as the Framers, possessing different political views and none representing the poorer debtor groups, as well as having George Washington as a chairman, it was not arguably incorrect to completely replace the inadequate document. Thus, the Constitutionof the United States was born by ratification of the majority; nine out of the thirteen states. The Framers, who drafted and debated the United States Constitution, envisioned a birth of a tri-divisional form of government where the executive division mandates the checks and balances that guards the legislative division and judicial branch, and having the head of the executive division with a President. The definition of an independent federal government was then born, and despite being built by federalists and antifederalists, it inherently created opposing political parties that were also shown later in history especially during the year 1793 when discontent between federalists like Alexander Hamilton and democratic republicans like James Madison, the father of the constitution, began to

Constitutional Convention After the Declaration of Independence, the colonies realized how vital a central government is and recognize their need for one. This change doesn’t come easy, on the contrary, there are several disputes on the abolishment of the Articles of Confederation and how this new form of government should be created and how it will be run. George Washington came out of retirement stating that an amendment to the Articles of Confederation was in order (Document A). In order to come up with all the necessary roles, the states are called into the Constitutional Convention.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention chose to write an entirely new constitution rather than fix the Articles because they needed a stronger central government and the current one was created with weak intentions. The Articles of Confederation was originally created to have a weak central government because the United States did not want to be like Britain. After fighting a harsh war with them, Americans did not want an overpowering government like their past ruler. Additionally, the government the Articles made was only unicameral legislature, so there was no separation of powers. No judicial nor an executive branch was there for checks and balances and to balance power. In addition, congress could not levy taxes and maintain a national

I believe that the constitution discriminates against the lower class. There has been many occasions to display that the actions of the United States are unfair to the lower class. I agree with this statement because I believe we are focused on protecting the wealthy’s economic interests. When setting up the Constitutional Convention only the elite of the time were chosen which most held positions of command or were already tied to constitutional forces, Shay’s rebellion was started due to the fact the government failed to pay the people, and lastly elitism is the most reflective of America.

When James Madison and the other 56 delegates to the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in May 1787, they intended to amend the Articles of Confederation. They ended up creating a new constitution, and Madison, representing Virginia, became the chief recorder of information. Like all successful political endeavors, the new federal Constitution—written just four years after the Treaty of Paris ended the American Revolution—has many "fathers" and many origins. None is more important than the economic and political unrest following the war and a band of ultra-nationalists led by Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and George Washington (“The James Madison Papers”). Although the Convention was intended to revise the Articles of Confederation,

Introduction: “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” stated Thomas Jefferson. The thirteen colonies created the Article of Confederation to establish a national government during the Revolutionary War. Several years later, the delegates met at the Constitutional Convention and created a new document known as the United States Constitution in 1787. However, it resulted in two major political parties, Federalists and Anti-federalists, that debated over the nature of the government.

In May of 1787, 55 delegates reunited at the Philadelphia convention to discuss solutions to fixing the weak national government that was under the Articles of Confederation . The Constitution was written in 1787 and was made to create a strong central government without creating tyranny or letting one get too much power. Tyranny was a big concern because they didn't want a cruel and oppressive government like the King of Britain , George III . The Constitution was able to guard against tyranny by creating federalism within the government and states , having separation of powers of the three branches- Executive, Judicial ,

Anti- Federalist were against the Constitution all together but most of all, I think the Anti-Federalist were against the fact that the state government’s would no longer have as much power like it did with the Articles of Confederation. The constitution supported the idea of a powerful and strong central government. The congress had the power to tax people, and make rules and regulations as it says in document two. With liberty being the Anti-Federalist’s biggest argument, the federalist got the idea that with all the power congress had, their freedom and rights would be threatened or even

“Articles of Confederation was an written agreement summarizing the agreement between different parties the federalist and the anti-federalist”. Federalist wanted to ratify the constitution,and Anti-federalist did not want to ratify it. One big issue they had was the concern of adding the “Bill of Rights”. The Federalist felt like it was unnecessary because, they believed the Constitution should only limited the government not the people. The Anti-federalist felt like the Constitution gave central government too much power.

The Second Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and took place in 1787. Representatives from each state gathered to discuss how the Articles of Confederation were to be amended. Several documents were debated on and put into effect on this day. Many of representatives of the states had written their own plans for the government. Not one plan was followed, but the delegates came to a compromise that they could agree on. Here, the United States’ current Constitution was signed. It has been modified as the years pass, but this was the foundation of America’s current constitution. Delegates at the Second Constitutional Convention had many concerns about the government. The states did not want a dominating national government,