The Consumer Privacy Bill Of Rights

Privacy is a very touchy subject these days and the knife seems to cut both ways when it comes to who should know what, and when they should know it. On one hand, the privacy of consumer information becomes a bigger concern every day as companies are hacked and information is stolen. There are laws that mandate what companies must to in order to protect this information but I also feel that organizations have their own internal obligation to do what’s right for

"We Need Privacy Laws for the Digital Era | The Nation." The Nation, 8 Jan. 2014. Web. 21 Oct. 2016.

During this project, the question arose; who is or has been the biggest winner of identity theft? In the few rare cases involving identity theft where a perpetrator was caught, the culprits in the following cases were identified. And the runner up in the game of identity theft is: Albert Gonzales who in 2008 stole 30 million credit and bank card numbers, hacked several corporate data bases and stole over $200 million. And our grand prize winner is: Philip Cummings who in 2002 obtained 15,000 consumer’s identities and hacked a credit reporting agency. He stole $2.7 million. (Graphs.net). While there is no clear solution to prevent being a victim of identity theft, a person can only take precautions, be aware of their surroundings, monitor

In addition to government’s involvement in privacy, there are also industry standards that help to dictate privacy rules and guidelines (van den Hoven, 2014). While these are not required by the government, the do provide an additional layer of privacy protection. Such as encryption, security protocols, and constant evaluation. It is up to everyone to continually strive for the highest level of privacy and protection. It is up to individuals to be proactive in maintaining their privacy, to the government to make sure laws are current and relevant, and to the industries to maintain and expanded industry privacy standards. While privacy will always be a concern, with respect to each other and integrity, privacy could be

Consumer online privacy is the most criticized subsection of Internet Privacy. Since technology has advanced, we don’t just buy goods on the internet, we pay our bills such as; Cell phone, TV and Internet. It is the most criticized

“8.6 million households (8.6%) experienced some form of Identity theft in 2010”, according to FTC. Research from all around the world reveals that identity theft affects millions of people per year, giving victims a numerous amount of hours and money in identity recovery and repair. In fact, in some cases, identity thieves are able to suppose an unaware person’s identity entirely, acquiring someone’s identification with their name and even often committing crimes as that person.

Identity theft has been a major issue of privacy and fraud. In the data breach analysis from the Identity Theft Resource Center (2013), the number of data breaches from the year 2005 to 2012 increased. In 2012, there had been 49% where the data breach exposed people Social Security Number. The data breach of 2012 has a rate of 27.4% caused by hackers. These breaches were commonly from 36.4% businesses and 34.7% health and medical (Identity Theft Resource Center 2013). The number of identity theft varies from physical possession to digital possession. At least one-fifth of trash cans contains papers listing people’s credit card number and personal information. People that throw away their

In this day and age, the threat of identity theft for the common individual has increased drastically. With advancements in technology and the ever growing power of the internet, identity thieves can rob personal information from unsuspecting victims quickly and easily. Identity theft has formed into a particular type of cyber crime. Perpetrators access the personal information of individuals by “phishing”, deceiving them into giving them personal data, the use of malware to access information, or hacking which allows criminals to illegally access individual’s computers. However, the breach of personal data is not limited to the individual person, as recently as 2016 organizations such as the United States Federal Reserve, the Central Bank

Privacy is a valuable interest and is now threatened more than ever by technological advances. Privacy is defined as the ability to control the collection, use, and dissemination of personal information (Fast Trac Course ). At one time people could once feel confident that what others may find out about them would be treated in a way that it would probably do any harm. Information technology has been beneficial for privacy. By having access to ATMs and online banking we rarely have to present ourselves to a teller. Online shopping offers similar benefits such as being able to shop without standing in long lines and being able to compare prices and research products before purchasing. However, since so much of what we do daily is done

Privacy advocates warn that many websites try to collect personal information from online users, but few guarantees how that data will be used. They say the federal government should establish standards to protect privacy online. But Internet businesses and others contend that they can safeguard users ' privacy without resorting to government interference. Law-enforcement agencies, meanwhile, favor government limitations on the use of sophisticated encryption technology, which makes online communications secure - even from the police. They fear that strong encryption software will help criminals in hiding their activities. But privacy advocates argue that encryption technology assures companies and consumers that their online communications are not being tampered with. . In one of the interview by By Biance Bosker, Mark Zuckerberg said “Facebook isn 't violating your privacy -- Google, Yahoo and Microsoft are.” The Internet has become not only a primary means of communication, but a place where millions of Americans store important personal data, from credit-card numbers and bank account information to family photos and histories of their online purchases. But that data does not have the same legal protection as data that Americans store in their homes. What 's more, powerful new technologies are creating unexpected challenges to privacy online. Advertisers, for example, can now track the Web sites you visit, and actions you take on those sites, to analyze how to more

Americans have had their personal information given away without even knowing it. From dozens of public and private sources that have created consumer profiles, “the average American is profiled in up to 150 commercial databases” (Hinds 7). People are trying to “prohibit collection of personal information on the

Consumers need to preserve their privacy, due to the fact that they don’t want to exposure their personal information to others. This fact has became one of the most important barrier for companies that try to collect as much information as they can, to arrive through a direct way to their consumers (Lee, 2015).

It is obvious that the purpose of data protection is to protect personal information and the privacy of individuals through a regulatory protection regime. The regime governs both when and how organisations may keep and process private information or data. It provides organisations with obligations that must be complied with and grant data protection rights to individuals. As noted in the Computer Law & Security Review (2012), issues about privacy and data protection are being discussed broadly and are likely to receive more attention in the future.

In 1998, the Federal Trade Commission determined that very few companies were divulging their usage of consumers’ personal data (Labalme “Fair Information Practices”). In an effort to encourage fair information practices, the FTC created guidelines for company privacy policies (“Enforcing Privacy Promises”). The guidelines, known as the Fair Information Practice Principles urge companies to clearly define the following: the company’s information practices; the consumer’s option to accept, decline, or specify usage of personal information; the consumer’s right to access personal data collected; the company’s affirmation of data accuracy and security; and the company’s intent to enforce the privacy policy (Labalme “Fair Information Practices”). As a result of the industry’s failure to adhere to the FIPP guidelines, the FTC urged Congress to create laws protecting privacy rights of consumers. Siding with corporate capitalists in favor of industry self-regulation, Congress declined to help. The FTC was ultimately left responsible for monitoring and prosecuting unfair information practices under section five of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which covers deceitful practices (Turow 8). Without congressional support,

According to Nakr (2011) In the United State of America, Almost people consider privacy is the fundamental right that should be protected. The authority or government should come out such a law to guard people privacy. As today, consumer privacy rights become more serious concern as the using of digital transaction which being exchanged over the Internet. All the sensitive information such as tax, health and identification number data is stored on the database. The owner will not know who has accessed to it. These concerns, users are become more aware of it and unwilling to easily provide such the most sensitive and private info. Marketers as a trustee should have a responsibility to preserve consumer data and not only