preview

The Contractual Scenarios On The Content

Better Essays

Introduction There are three main contractual scenarios in the content. It will introduce the material facts and related legal issues of each scenario. A detailed analysis will be provided in below to further identify the issues with principles and cases. At the end, there will be conclusions and additional arguments for cases. Scenario 1 Facts & Issues One day, Candy- the owner of Candy’s Coffee Cart had lunch with her childhood friend Blair – the owner of Blair’s Beans as a coffee beans and coffee equipment supplier. Blair has mentioned the launch of new coffee beans which met Candy’s requirement. So he suggested Candy of “22 two-kilogram bags of Sumatran coffee beans per month at his list price for five years”. And Candy accepted. …show more content…

This must be communicated to the offeree. Refer to Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co , Blair’s suggesting the coffee beans is an offer to Candy. From the fact, it clearly identifies the terms such as the length and the content of the contract and communication involves. So it is manifest that an offer exists. Next is to discuss it there an acceptance in the contract. An acceptance is a final, unqualified assent to the terms of an offer specified by the offeror . It also requires communication to the offeror. According to The Crown v Clarke , the acceptance should be made in reliance on offer. In this case, Candy accepted Blair’s offer, which symbolises as an acceptance. Prior to the intention to create legal relations, one noticeable argument may be the time of the intention. Acceptance created may be subjective or conditional upon a special event , which whether the conditional acceptances should be viewed as intention to be bounded in the contract is unclear like Masters v Cameron . To some extents, Candy accepted all the terms except the contract length while Blair agreed to edit this term later when they entered a written contract. But it did not mention about the following process of this contract. It is acknowledged that the agreement agreed with might only be regarded as “Head of Agreement” and the intention would be at the time the contract being signed. Or more information is required to adjust this argument. Based on the justification above,

Get Access